User talk:Newlifeinrome: Difference between revisions
decline unblock |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{uw-block3|reason=using multiple accounts for block evasion (of {{User|Newlifeinlondon}}}} |
{{uw-block3|reason=using multiple accounts for block evasion (of {{User|Newlifeinlondon}}}} |
||
{{unblock|STICK IT UP YOUR A*ES YOU POMPOUS ANORAK OF KEYBOARD JUNKIES. (ARSE IS UK FOR A*S, IN CASE YOU WERE TOO BUSY SQUEEZING PIMPLES TO NOTICE). I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT ON A WEBSITE THAT PRIDES ITSELF ON LETTING ANYONE EDIT, MY CHANGES RESULTED IN MY ACCOUNT BEING SUSPENDED DUE TO A FEW LITTLE CRETINS NOT LIKING THE FACT THAT I WOULDN'T ACCEPT THEIR EDITING SUPERIORITY. SERIOUSLY I LIKED MY VERSION MORE THAN YOURS. YOU LIKED YOURS MORE THAN MINE. THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG IN MY CHANGES BEYOND THE FACT THAT YOU MALODOROUS MORONS DIDN'T LIKE THEM. ATROCIOUS LITTLE PEOPLE. ADDENDUM. I ONLY EDITED THE BAD LANGUAGE AS YOUR FILTER PICKED UP ON IT THE FIRST TIME I HIT RETURN}} |
{{unblock reviewed|1=STICK IT UP YOUR A*ES YOU POMPOUS ANORAK OF KEYBOARD JUNKIES. (ARSE IS UK FOR A*S, IN CASE YOU WERE TOO BUSY SQUEEZING PIMPLES TO NOTICE). I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT ON A WEBSITE THAT PRIDES ITSELF ON LETTING ANYONE EDIT, MY CHANGES RESULTED IN MY ACCOUNT BEING SUSPENDED DUE TO A FEW LITTLE CRETINS NOT LIKING THE FACT THAT I WOULDN'T ACCEPT THEIR EDITING SUPERIORITY. SERIOUSLY I LIKED MY VERSION MORE THAN YOURS. YOU LIKED YOURS MORE THAN MINE. THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG IN MY CHANGES BEYOND THE FACT THAT YOU MALODOROUS MORONS DIDN'T LIKE THEM. ATROCIOUS LITTLE PEOPLE. ADDENDUM. I ONLY EDITED THE BAD LANGUAGE AS YOUR FILTER PICKED UP ON IT THE FIRST TIME I HIT RETURN|decline=I see the problem; here's a [http://www.ihatethecapslockkey.com/ link that may help]. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk)''</span>]] 22:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 22:37, 17 January 2010
January 2010
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Saw VI. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 17:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Newlifeinrome (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
STICK IT UP YOUR A*ES YOU POMPOUS ANORAK OF KEYBOARD JUNKIES. (ARSE IS UK FOR A*S, IN CASE YOU WERE TOO BUSY SQUEEZING PIMPLES TO NOTICE). I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT ON A WEBSITE THAT PRIDES ITSELF ON LETTING ANYONE EDIT, MY CHANGES RESULTED IN MY ACCOUNT BEING SUSPENDED DUE TO A FEW LITTLE CRETINS NOT LIKING THE FACT THAT I WOULDN'T ACCEPT THEIR EDITING SUPERIORITY. SERIOUSLY I LIKED MY VERSION MORE THAN YOURS. YOU LIKED YOURS MORE THAN MINE. THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG IN MY CHANGES BEYOND THE FACT THAT YOU MALODOROUS MORONS DIDN'T LIKE THEM. ATROCIOUS LITTLE PEOPLE. ADDENDUM. I ONLY EDITED THE BAD LANGUAGE AS YOUR FILTER PICKED UP ON IT THE FIRST TIME I HIT RETURN
Decline reason:
I see the problem; here's a link that may help. Kuru (talk) 22:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.