Jump to content

User talk:Brad101: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Brad101/Archive 4, User talk:Brad101/Archive 5.
Line 41: Line 41:
very nice article, and I plan to support. May I help you with a few of your awkward verb problems? [[User:Auntieruth55|Auntieruth55]] ([[User talk:Auntieruth55|talk]]) 19:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
very nice article, and I plan to support. May I help you with a few of your awkward verb problems? [[User:Auntieruth55|Auntieruth55]] ([[User talk:Auntieruth55|talk]]) 19:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
:If you were referring to {{USS|Congress|1799}} which is currently at FAC, I would appreciate the help. --[[User:Brad101|Brad]] ([[User talk:Brad101#top|talk]]) 12:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
:If you were referring to {{USS|Congress|1799}} which is currently at FAC, I would appreciate the help. --[[User:Brad101|Brad]] ([[User talk:Brad101#top|talk]]) 12:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

== Congratulations! ==

{| style="border: 2px solid lightsteelblue; background-color: whitesmoke;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[Image:WikiChevronsOakLeaves.png|80px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The ''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Awards#WikiChevrons_with_Oak_Leaves|WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves]] '''''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid lightsteelblue;" | By order of the cooordinators of the Military history Project, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of your excellent work on a sizable number of nautical articles that fall within our scope which has produced a number of high quality articles for the Military history Project and WikiProject Ships. Keep up the good work! [[User:TomStar81|TomStar81]] ([[User talk:TomStar81|Talk]]) 06:35, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
|}

Revision as of 06:35, 27 February 2010

min=4 min=1

If you post a message here, I'll usually respond here
(on this page) unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.


Ships table

You had asked for an assessment table for the Ships project that only lists some of the assessment classes. That table is now being updated at User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/Custom/Ships-1. You can transclude it from there to any other place.

The table will be updated daily, but only when it has changed since the last time it was uploaded. — Carl (CBM · talk) 16:47, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I installed it to {{Ships sidebar}} which appears on our project pages. The full table still resides on the assessment page. Nice to have both versions. --Brad (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No B-class? —Ed (talkmajestic titan) 19:37, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
eeeeep. Good catch Ed. I'll make sure it's corrected. --Brad (talk) 19:59, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
:) —Ed (talkmajestic titan) 20:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added B-Class; I omitted that from the list somehow. I updated the tables just now, and B-Class will remain in the future updates. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; looks good. --Brad (talk) 13:33, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification?

Hiya. I believe that you were the one to apply the clarification tag to the sentence "Contrary to myth, the ships do not move noticeably sideways when a broadside is fired." over at Iowa class battleship; but for the life of me I can not figure out what you want me clarify. Could I trouble you to stick a note on my talk page or the article talk page or in hidden syntax in the article itself so I can figure out what you want clarified? Also, I wanted to thank you for taking such an active role in the FAR; I have trouble sometimes getting good feedback from the PR system, so naturally I am thrilled to see that the FAR is generating lots of suggestions for improvement. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:09, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to say thanks for the clarification. Also, I would like to extend an offer to join Operation Majestic Titan, we could use a outstanding editor such as yourself. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: New ship articles

Will do! Bonewah (talk) 19:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

USS Constitution article

very nice article, and I plan to support. May I help you with a few of your awkward verb problems? Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you were referring to USS Congress (1799) which is currently at FAC, I would appreciate the help. --Brad (talk) 12:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

The WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves
By order of the cooordinators of the Military history Project, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons with Oak Leaves in recognition of your excellent work on a sizable number of nautical articles that fall within our scope which has produced a number of high quality articles for the Military history Project and WikiProject Ships. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 06:35, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]