User talk:Mikemikev: Difference between revisions
→Question: new section |
→R & I history article: new section |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
Is [[User:120 Volt monkey]] an alternate account of yours? [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] ([[User talk:Hipocrite|talk]]) 15:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC) |
Is [[User:120 Volt monkey]] an alternate account of yours? [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] ([[User talk:Hipocrite|talk]]) 15:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
== R & I history article == |
|||
Mike, |
|||
I would appreciate you being more involved in [[History_of_the_race_and_intelligence_controversy | this article]]. I know you’re aware of its NPOV issues since you’ve commented on them before, and I think it’ll be easier to deal with them if we can have a larger number of users involved in it. --[[User:Captain Occam|Captain Occam]] ([[User talk:Captain Occam|talk]]) 08:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:41, 18 April 2010
Deletion of introductory section on weather and climate on Climate Change page =
Why did you delete this? A short introduction to what weather and climate are is a way to speedily introduce a reader to the concepts following and "sets the scene". This also aids comprehension and introduces a framework to make the discussion relevant. I would apprecaite if you would just leave it there for these reasons.
Xolin (talk) 00:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
I've read the mediation, there was no consensus to revert there.Aprock (talk) 23:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Race and intelligence, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Race and intelligence was changed by Mikemikev (u) (t) deleting 111441 characters on 2010-01-12T09:36:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
race and intelligence
mike - I just noticed that you aren't signed on as a participant at the race and intelligence mediation. you need to formally accept the rules of the mediation on the main page before you make any further contributions.
I am beginning to be concerned that you are more interested in arguing here than in reaching any real consensus. SLR has been trying to find a middle ground - are you willing to work with him to any extent at all? --Ludwigs2 17:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Why Ludwig went ballistic
Because he's in a HEAP 'o trouble! Read about that and and how Wapondaponda just got the entire mediation on the edge of being canceled yesterday HERE
I'll get banned as retribution for "telling", but WTF, y'know? All things must pass.
Hey, it was nice talkin' to ya Mike!
love,
-faye
R&I mediation
there 's a draft of an outline at Wikipedia_talk:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2009-11-12/Race_and_Intelligence#Proposed_outline. You have not yet commented on it, and I am preparing to give the outline to David.Kane (per current agreement in mediation) to enter a draft of the article in mainspace. There will be a review/revision period after the draft is entered in which any issues can be addressed, so if you have no immediate comment, or can't get to the mediation page to make a comment, you can participate in the review and we can address any concerns you still have there.
sorry for the bulk message. --Ludwigs2 11:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Race and intelligence, new draft
A new draft of the race and intelligence article is being edited into mainspace, based on discussion in mediation. It should be completed sometime on 4/1/2010. I am posting this notice to mediation participants in the hopes that those who have not contributed recently to the mediation will come back to review and comment on the draft, and help discuss any revisions that need to be made. You may make any reviews or comments at the mediation page, and we will discuss any revisions that need to be made.
I'd also ask you to leave a note for David.Kane (talk · contribs) on his talk page. Whatever your opinion of the draft itself, I think he deserves thanks for putting a lot of time and effort into making the revisions. --Ludwigs2 18:45, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
huh?
You just deleted a ton of stuff from R&I but just mentioned Gould. Was that a mistake? Can we talk about your issues in bits and pieces? By the way, I would like to get in touch with you off-wiki. I am at dave at kanecap dot com. David.Kane (talk) 14:15, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Question
Is User:120 Volt monkey an alternate account of yours? Hipocrite (talk) 15:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
R & I history article
Mike,
I would appreciate you being more involved in this article. I know you’re aware of its NPOV issues since you’ve commented on them before, and I think it’ll be easier to deal with them if we can have a larger number of users involved in it. --Captain Occam (talk) 08:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC)