User talk:Soenke Rahn

de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Soenke_Rahn
This page is a soft redirect.

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Soenke Rahn! I am Calaka and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Calaka (talk) 04:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Soenke Rahn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  I'^mperator 20:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for leaving a note

Hello, Soenke, I am glad that you have set up a user page in the English Wikipedia. I also received your e-mail. You are correct in pointing out that Luther's followers called themselves "Evangelicals" while the Roman Catholics called them "Lutherans." Some of our older Lutheran Churches still have the word "Evangelical" in their name. As you know, the largest Lutheran denomination (Konfession) in America is called the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. These uses of the word are in line with the old meaning of the word "evangelical" (evangelisch).

You are right, though, about the use of the term "evangelical." It has only been in the last 40 years that the term "evangelical" refers to conservative Protestants, who want to return to a more biblical Christianity.

Hallo, Soenke, ich froh, dass Sie eine Verbraucherseite in der englischen Wikipedia aufgestellt haben. Ich habe auch Ihre E-Mail empfangen. Sie sind richtig weisend in darauf hin, dass die Anhänger von Luther sich „Evangelischer“ gerufen hat, während die römischen Katholiken sie „Lutheraner“ gerufen haben. Einige von unseren älteren lutherischen Kirchen haben noch das Wort „Evangelischen“ in ihrem Namen. Als Sie wissen, ist die größte Lutheraner Benennung (Konfession) in Amerika die Evangelische lutherische Kirche in Amerika gerufen. Diese Gebräuche des Worts sind in Linie mit der alten Bedeutung des Worts „evangelisch“ (evangelisch).--Drboisclair (talk) 05:46, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Evgeny Tovkun

To nominate an article for deletion, see WP:AFD, WP:SPEEDY, or WP:PROD. More information is at Wikipedia:Guide to deletion.

thanks --Soenke Rahn (talk) 11:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Probably Evgeny Kovtun (Ковтун), but eight weeks have gone by so the problem has probably been sorted out by now./ Hello again, I have carried on with editing so I am glad to see your own Luther articles have grown. Best wishes.--Felix folio secundus 17:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Hallo zu dir

I am glad that you always give me a line once in a while! I hope you are doing well. Gruesz, David--Drboisclair (talk) 14:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Froehliche Reformationzeit

Happy Reformation Day and Halloween Night. (-: Sönke --Soenke Rahn (talk) 20:47, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, Soenke, und zu dir auch!--Drboisclair (talk) 05:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Audio theatre

Guten tag. Thank you for your message. Unfortunately, that subject is outside my area of expertise, and I do not believe I can be of much assistance. Good luck to you. Tschüss. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 00:03, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, (-: --Soenke Rahn (talk) 00:22, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Dear Soenke,

I also thank you for your message. I don't have a strong opinion about this issue. I can appreciate several viewpoints. To me, Audio theatre is a strange term because I think of an actual theatre. Audio drama might work.

Best regards,

RadioBroadcast (talk) 03:17, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much (-: --Soenke Rahn (talk) 03:20, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Soenke, thank you very much for your message. I hope I will be able to find time to participate more fully in the discussion before too long (too many other commitments at this very moment, however -- Christmas is coming!). May I just say, as quick points for now, though, that

1) I agree with the general principle of there being an "over-arching" article encompassing the whole topic of audio drama / audio fiction;

2) radio drama (by no means dead, whatever may have happened in United States broadcasting!) ought to remain at the heart of that topic, and is sufficiently important IMHO probably to deserve a separate "sub-article" of its own; and

3) I agree very much with User:RadioBroadcast that the chief article should NOT be called "Audio theatre": that just doesn't ring any bells with me (a consumer of "audio" -- mostly radio -- drama for well over 50 years) -- it makes me think of some kind of building, or at the very least of large numbers of listeners gathered in one place, which is not the audio drama experience at all! -- Picapica (talk) 09:21, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much much. I suppose this is an interesting statement. So I placed a link on the discussion site of the audio theatre article to it and I answered there a little bit. Yes Christmas is comming, and I am sorry that this discussion goes up yet, but it was another German User which made pressure, I would say. )-: I placed on the simple english wikipedia the article http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_audio_dramas_in_English_speaking_countries I will enlarge it, step for step. And possibly it could help also. In the moment I use first a catalogue of the BBC of 1996/1997 (I have) and I will see which audio dramas I own and so on. ... I hope that you will have the article on yor watchlist and that you will help possibly later again in the discussion. --- In Flensburg we have a lot of snow in the moment and I must see in the next hour that I will go into the city center to buy the last gifts. (o: In the moment the sun is shining and in the evening the coldness will come again. --- So --- I wish you a merry Christmas, Sönke --Soenke Rahn (talk) 12:36, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

• Dear Soenke,

Thank you for your message. I think the entry is perfectly valid, and with some expansion could justify its existence. I don't think the article should —or indeed could— be merged with radio drama as the two, to my mind, are quite dissimilar; if a piece is presented for broadcast then it does constitute radio drama, but audio theatre/drama is not presented in quite the same way. Of course, this is all just my opinion!

On the subject of audio drama vs. audio theatre, I'm quite happy with the latter term: the article could be expanded to incorporate instances where live performance has been crafted around soundscapes rather than physical action.

I will be happy to contribute to the discussion. All the best, and Merry Christmas to you, too! Absurdtrousers (talk) 15:38, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Geneva Bible

I have seen the hardcover Geneva Bible. Daniel 4:1 is KJV Daniel 4:4. King James added the new verses in his new bible. You should use another computer. Sonic99 (talk) 03:13, 22 December 2010 (UTC)