Jump to content

User talk:24.9.117.18: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Message re. Talk:Blood type diet (HG)
Line 9: Line 9:


[[Special:Contributions/24.9.117.18|24.9.117.18]] ([[User talk:24.9.117.18#top|talk]]) 00:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/24.9.117.18|24.9.117.18]] ([[User talk:24.9.117.18#top|talk]]) 00:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

[[Image:Information.png|25px|alt=|link=]] Welcome to Wikipedia. The <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3aBlood_type_diet?diff=413017794 recent edit]</span> you made to [[:Talk:Blood type diet]] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. You may also wish to read the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|introduction to editing]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle1 --> [[User:EWikist |<b><font color = "black"> EW</font><sub><sub><font color = "red"><big><big>i</big></big></font></sub></sub><font color = "black">kist</font></b>]][[User talk:EWikist|<sup><font color = "black">Talk</font></sup>]] 00:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:56, 10 February 2011

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I've gone ahead and tagged the statement you dispute, awaiting you to explain your position on the article talk page. The relevant policies/guidelines are WP:NPOV, WP:MEDRS, and WP:FRINGE. --Ronz (talk) 00:37, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ronz! Here is my position (see link to talk page) as per your suggestion. I am not pro-Damato, by the way, but assuming "absolute consensus" is not good encyclopedic writing. There are better ways to phrase it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Blood_type_diet#Article_is_Being_Obsessively_Treated_Like_Personal_Territory_Rather_Than_a_Wikipedia_Collaborative_Effort

24.9.117.18 (talk) 00:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Blood type diet has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. EWikistTalk 00:56, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]