User talk:Gogo Dodo

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here. When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind: Use a descriptive subject/headline. If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to. Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless... If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section. Click here to leave me a message

Talk:Ideal_wealth_distribution

Hi! User:Imersion recreated Talk:Ideal_wealth_distribution again, I wonder if you could be so kind to re-re-delete it. :) I've explained to him that he should stop this and that he can get blocked if he continues, so I hope he stops. --OpenFuture (talk) 22:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

As I said, I was only trying to get to the discussion page for Ideal wealth distribution. I inadvertently thought that the discussion for the deletion reasons were on thetalk page fo rthe article. I did not know that ther was discussion going on on the deletion page. The whole process is a bureaucratic nightmare for a novice and I hav enot gone through it before. So I was simply trying to reinstate that page. Then I discovered I could actually protest the deletion and os I tried that bu that still makes no sense to m since there is still no discussion. However I would like to get back to the discussion I had with opnfuture so I can understand this process a bit better; fo rthe next occasion.

My complaint with openfuture is that he and I were having a discussion adn yet he saw that our discussion was on an irrlevant page that was going to get deleted and woudl not affect any one else's decision. He could have pointed this out o me with a small amount of courtesy, but he gleefully insulted my ability as a psychologist nd ALL psychologists in connection with economics. He seems to be ignorant of the wide spread praise for behavioral economists or behavioral finance researchers such as Daniel Kahneman ( a psychologist) who won the nobel prize in economics. I would like to have that discussion in case he pursues this issue into other irrelevant areas. In my opinion OpenFuture was nasty in his reckless dismissal of psychologissts. If you look at my user space, you will see that that is all there is on it, and he did look at that and then made some (to my mind) deliberately abusive comments.

Anyway, I do want to get and keep his commentary but I hav e no interest in pursuing the ideal wealth distribution article in the face of such uninformed hostility. So If you can, please delete it but please help me get the commentary back for the record. By the way, someone else joined the discussion there modestly supporting my position, but I cannot remember who - perhaps PAR. None of this showed up ont he crucial deletion page, of course.... Thanks. Imersion (talk) 00:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:23, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

FYI: Nothing of what he writes above is true, just so you know. --OpenFuture (talk) 06:52, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the help, I really appreciate your efforts, and actually the countless reverts really started getting on my nerves. I'll let you know. Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:41, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Tag-teamming IP vandals

Sorry to disturb you, but I would to get your attention to three IPs I've found so far that are seemed to be used by the same vandal:

• 108.129.103.200 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• 108.129.80.106 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• 108.129.107.17 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Theses IPs try to ridiculously connect Lilo & Stitch with several unrelated titles, two of which are The Powerpuff Girls and Ni-Hao, Kai-lan. I don't know if you can do rangeblocks (they're all from the 108.129.64.0/18 range), but I have to least tell you that this is going on. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 01:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

PS: I've already reported the first one to WP:AIV, but I'm afraid it seems that it is currently backlogged. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 01:28, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:44, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Mathew McFarlane

we are creating a truthful message explaining the basic knowlage about Mathew MvFarlane. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Southvietnam (talk • contribs) 16:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:10, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

db-meta button and HTLM-encoded title characters

It should be fixed now. Thanks for noticing this.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 10:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Anu Hasan

Hi

My wife's page has again been changed to an incorrect name. This is causing both personal and professional problems, and we need to get this resolved asap. I can provide a copy of her drivers licence if you advise where this should be sent to

I'd also like to point out that this page was in the name of Anu Hasan until someone ill-informed changed it, with no evidence to back up this change.

PS I've now amended it back to having both the correct and incorrect pages online which saves some of the problems and would appreciate if it could be left that way until we resolve this issue

PPS I now see you've changed it again. This needs to be rectified URGENTLY. The section on multiple surnames in the wiki help files say that it should be the name by which they are best known. As all interviews conducted by Anu use the surname Hasan, and her forum uses Hasan, and the TV channels press releases use Hasan, and her drivers licence/passport/wedding certificate are in the name of Hasan, and her personal email address is <struck> I think this is evidence enough

Regards Graham Jay Gjay66 (talk) 20:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)