User talk:Gogo Dodo/Archive 16
|This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.|
- 1 User:JehnCD
- 2 Message from Brybaby
- 3 Your wrong
- 4 >:(
- 5 help
- 6 Why was ShieldMaster listing Deleted? Please restore
- 7 RMQD???
- 8 RE: Ron Christie
- 9 Message from Spunkybailey
- 10 DJ Nihilist Spam
- 11 Thank you
- 12 I hope you don't mind
- 13 Message from Medusa1122
- 14 Thanks
- 15 Thanks
- 16 Perry Jones/ Kyle Prater
- 17 Please Remove It Completely.
- 18 User:Victor galindez
- 19 A problem with the baptist article
- 20 Stay Away From Me!
- 21 Message from Twonkomadness
- 22 Los Atrevidos
- 23 Wasted Bandwidth
- 24 Protected Article
- 25 Please mail me the copy
- 26 Deletion of Letsvidz
- 27 Jano Janosik
- 28 Goodbye
- 29 Greg McCann
- 30 Peach Melba
- 31 Ashley Ash Morgan
- 32 Destoria
- 33 Virtual Barnstar
- 34 Bump The Show
- 35 Mr. Alligator
- 36 Nick Adenhart
- 37 Novastor Online Backup
- 38 Tammy_Rosebush
- 39 Hey, I changed my thing and you still deleted it
- 40 Greetings,
- 41 please restore ´Khamah nambala´
- 42 User:22.214.171.124 and SpikeyRussia
- 43 Mimmirocks
- 44 Micro-donations
- 45 George Hotz
- 46 Thanks for the welcome
- 47 CashedKingdom Records
- 48 Socks
- 49 Deleting others' comments from Editor Review
- 50 Bclrocks10
- 51 Happy Gogo Dodo's Day!
- 52 Please reactivate account
- 53 The Game
- 54 Max Leger
- 55 User talk:Once upon a time in a far away land
- 56 Adriano Espaillat
- 57 Re: Re: Favor: Send me a deleted page please!
- 58 Thanks
- 59 Message from John2228
- 60 Message from Jimm222888
- 61 Adriano Espaillat is under attack
- 62 List of U.S. cities with minority mayors
- 63 Thanks....
- 64 Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains
- 65 Message from Thankful777
- 66 Recent removal of external link
- 67 survivor HvV
- 68 Exile Island
- 69 Our DJ friend is back
- 70 Bonnie Brooks Article
- 71 What to do with userpages like this?
- 72 Message from Viralinfectioncode45709
- 73 Message from Afiresavesday
- 74 G7 of The Hazard
- 75 Al-Ahbash page
- 76 Medak Diocese
- 77 Thanks
- 78 Question about notability
- 79 Myachi
- 80 P.M.S Band Deletion
- 81 online land planning
- 82 Article
- 83 Message from Popkinfot
- 84 My Message
- 85 J G Wentworth & Associates accidental termination
- 86 RE:CSD G1
- 87 Cleudodentosteinism
- 88 Sock you blocked
- 89 Astral Earth
- 90 Deven lind
- 91 Re:Nick Adenhart
- 92 Gnome Hut
- 93 Please help with an edit filter problem
- 94 My Big Fat Independent Movie
- 95 Advice_(band) deleted
- 96 Porque?
- 97 Thanks
- 98 Message from Omm001
- 99 David Mertz - zombie AfD listing in software deltion sorting and archive
- 100 CSD tagging and reverting
- 101 No Explanation?
- 102 Adenhart - TFA request
- 103 Re: Ding!
- 104 User:ChrJes
- 105 Problem with Bclrocks10
- 106 Recent block
- 107 veDrò (think tank)
- 108 about spooler (utm)
- 109 NOOO
- 110 Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains
- 111 Thulnar deleted page
- 112 User:Bclrocks10
- 113 who is...
- 114 The New Haiti Project
- 115 Deleted Article : Shri Laxmi Narayan Dev Vadtal Gadi Acharya Parampara
- 116 Thanks
- 117 User:Unreal Engine 3, User:Unreal Engine 4, User:Unreal Engine 5
- 118 what?
- 119 Notability
- 120 Message from Devynpie
- 121 bathroomvillage
- 122 Mitchell mcdonald
- 123 Message from Sbhullar
- 124 Page Deletion
- 125 Gogo Dodo pages
- 126 Angels' template
- 127 lol
- 128 BrianTheVillain123
- 129 HEY
- 130 General Questions
- 131 Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains
- 132 Thank you
- 133 Homie
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:25, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Blocked another one. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Message from Brybaby
What i have written is not in any way threating or abusive and is the truth richard foley will vouch for this. So what is the problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daisysmith (talk • contribs) 04:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
i'd like to send you an email but not here where everyone can read it. Its in refernce to a page you deleted that was an attack on a person. Please help. whoever this person is that writes these things has made other threats on other websites and i must get to the bottom of this. Myrights2010 (talk) 01:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Why was ShieldMaster listing Deleted? Please restore
We do not understand why ShieldMaster was deleted. It is a valuable entry as it is one of the last projects in which Joe Simon was involved (Joe Simon). We would like to have the ShiledMaster listing restored. If a link to Joe Simon is required, please add.Scriptwriter2002 (talk) 16:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
RE: Ron Christie
Got it. Should have double checked for other authors.
Message from Spunkybailey
DJ Nihilist Spam
I've noticed that you have also caught a few of these they seem to be coming in from a range of 3-4 IP's hitting about 6 pages. I've done at least 3 rounds of reverts in the last 24 hours. I searched for DJ Nihilist and got less then 100 hits on google all garbage. Ridernyc (talk) 07:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:20, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking the vandal who kept defacing my user page. A plate of cookies for you!
I hope you don't mind
Message from Medusa1122
The point is valid. They aren't notable enough. And things that aren't notable enough, that don't meet the criteria, shouldn't be on the site. Simple as that, or so you would have me believe. Medusa1122 (talk) 00:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Perry Jones/ Kyle Prater
Both articles have been put up for deletion. The person says thay aren't notable because they haven't played on a professional level, but there are lots of non professional athlete pages. I dont see what is wrong with them. They have sources/refs that talk about them. Ice (talk) 22:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Please Remove It Completely.
Hi :) I pleadfully ask you completely remove my deleted "Europe Family Sweden" page entirely. I do not want it to be 'cached', I want it removed completely. Please, I ask this be done as soon as possible as I do not want or need it anymore, and feel uncomfortable with it online now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gghh1122 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the response.
I appreciate the acknowledgement. I hope I was not pressuring. Thank you. I understand and I will be patient. Goodbye :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gghh1122 (talk • contribs) 08:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
I was just wondering when the approxiamate time of the complete deletion of my "Europe Family Sweden" is? Any estimate? Please reply quick since I have to go soon, thank you and goodbye. :) Gghh1122 (talk) 15:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I am sorry you feel that I was condescending to the above editor. That was not my intention. The quality of the articles he created (Blanca Sanchez, Mario Iván Martínez) was such that I was compelled to contact him and advise him to desist from creating articles until he had learned how to do so properly. I suppose I employed stronger language than User:Minimac94, the editor who welcomed him to Wikipedia, who had issued similar advice. I apologize if my language was too strong and I came off as condescending. I assure you that, to the best of my knowledge, that has never been a criticism levelled at me. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 12:23, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
A problem with the baptist article
The baptist article fails to be a neutral page in that it calls baptists a "Protestant" church. In doing so wikipedia is giving sole credence to the common yet mistaken belief that baptists came out of the catholic church. Even if they don't agree with the view that baptists precede Catholics, they should at least remove the word Protestant and thusly leave the article totally neutral. Most of the rest of the article does well with demonstrating wikipedia's stand on remaining a neutral site, but the beginning of the article is disapointing at best. Jakestang (talk) 00:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
An appology for my poor behavior, and response to your reply.
I appologise if I came across ..... un-neutral, my use of the word "heretical" could be considered POV and therefor, biased. As for the other two words you pointed out, I suppose I could have chosen more gentle words. Instead of "slaughtered" I should have said "publically executed in large groups", and instead of "murderers" I should have said "public executioners" or "punishers of those that disagreed with them". However, while harsh, they were not POVs, but historical fact, some accounts of which you can find in Foxe's Book Of Martyrs. I fail to understand, however, why everything I write can be so swiftly removed on the grounds of being "biased" or failing to be "neutral" yet when I point out something that fits both cases, I am told to discuss it in a chat line. And one other little observation, for being supposedly neutral, why is it that one can edit the Baptist and Catholic pages, yet the Muslim page is locked and un-touchable? The stands that wikipedia claims don't always seem to be neutral. I am not sure if I responded to this message the right way -I edited my first one- so I look forward to your response so I can be sure you read this. Jakestang (talk) 05:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Stay Away From Me!
- Please review Wikipedia's guideline for musicians for inclusion on Wikipedia and the guideline for writing an autobiography. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Message from Twonkomadness
so it doesn't make any difference if he's a school mate? guess i'll just have to make a youtube video about him, then eh? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twonkomadness (talk • contribs) 19:22, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
what do i need to do to prove this? I'm sorry but i honestly want to make a page on this team, it is the reason i joined wikipedia, thanks for you help gogo dodo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Losatrevidos (talk • contribs) 22:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Los Atrevidos FC
Hello Gogo Dodo, i was distraught to learn that you have deleted a part of my heritage - the Los Atrevidos FC page. Please could you explain to me your reasons for this? Kind Regards x —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 22:33, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- The article was deleted because it was an obvious hoax article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:35, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
This is incorrect, it is in fact an actual team that i support based in Southampton, England. They are plying their trade in the Bundesliga Student League, First Division. They have been playing for a few years now and i would be delighted if you could re-instate the site. This would be muchly appreciated x —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 22:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- You may create an account and create a legitimate article about the team if it exists. The "article" that was there was obviously a hoax and I will not be restoring it. If you have an issue with the deletion, you may file a review at WP:DRV. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:44, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
To be quite honest with you Gogo, im incensed by this decision to call it a "hoax"!! It is an outrage that has caused chaos upon the local atrevidos faithful! How do i go about proving to you that this is a factual team? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 23:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
http://www.goalsfootball.co.uk/Leagues/ Take a look at the southampton league, wednesday bundesliga, students league, liga 1, for my faithful fan here once you have seen the currently impressive 5th position in the league for the team you can then understand my passion as manager to ensure that fans and players gain the exposure they desire. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Losatrevidos (talk • contribs) 23:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
The amount of bandwidth that is being wasted by the numerous editors who create one hoax article after the other is amazing and sad at the same time. :) It appears as if some school kiddies sitting in class are playing around with their smartphones. Amsaim (talk) 22:37, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for protecting Jeff Zucker. Unfortunately, as you were protecting it, a vandal got it again (diff). Please undo that as well. Thanks! Ajraddatz (Talk - Contributions) 22:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Please mail me the copy
please send me the mail of my first deleted page (Amender technologies), i will be very thankful to you.
about Amender Technologies article
Dear Gogo Dodo,
Please can you suggest me, what changes I have to do in the Amender Technologies page, so that it can be used as an article ? I will be very thankful to your co-operation. Mictesting123 (talk) 06:31, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thanks for the information
Deletion of Letsvidz
Hello, you deleted the page Letsvidz, that I was creating. I had very little text on it, and had the 'under construction' note at the top, then someone else nominated it for deletion for using an article as a test page, so I erased the text, wrote an explanation on the talk page, and went to the sandbox to test. I had just finished in the sandbox and went back to the article and saw that you deleted it because it was a blank page. I am new to creating pages on Wikipedia, and do not know all of the rules. Thank You for your time, please respond as soon as possible. Jamk9 (talk) 01:33, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Which ones? I can't see anything linking him to The Violets, and one of them was deleted in an apparent AFD, I think: Stewboss, but I can't tell from the AFD what the article was about. -WarthogDemon 03:23, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Found his myspace page. Apparently there are three, Bardo (band), The Violets, and Stewboss. Since we made it two out of three, I'm wondering if perhaps it shouldn't be AFD'd but just needing sources badly. The problem is that I can't seem to find any reliable sources. The problem is that when I Google Jano alongside either of the two, the only hits I get are in networking sites, one or two blogs, and mirrors of the wiki article. -WarthogDemon 03:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Can't find anything decent for two of them, but I found these two links concerning Stewboss. Unless that somehow makes Stewboss notable, I'm not sure it's helpful - and if it were, that still leaves all the other bands he was involved with unsourced. Three attempts with The Violets and Bardo still reveals nothing but networking sites, blogs, and mirrors. Looks like this would be the article's last (and only) hope here. -WarthogDemon 18:59, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Found his myspace page. Apparently there are three, Bardo (band), The Violets, and Stewboss. Since we made it two out of three, I'm wondering if perhaps it shouldn't be AFD'd but just needing sources badly. The problem is that I can't seem to find any reliable sources. The problem is that when I Google Jano alongside either of the two, the only hits I get are in networking sites, one or two blogs, and mirrors of the wiki article. -WarthogDemon 03:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
As it has become painfully obvious, my contributions are no longer welcome or needed here. In light of this situation, I am leaving this screwed up bureaucracy for the conceivable future. Good luck, my friend and keep fighting the good fight. ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM WuhWuzDat 02:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
January 13 is National Peach Melba Day. Why did you remove this edit to the Peach Melba Page? I can provide a link to a comprehensive list of food-related holidays for the US if you like. Would like some feedback as this is my very first edit on Wikipedia.
Ashley Ash Morgan
yea but she already has an album...I forgot the name..she has a song with selena gomez too...she was in suite lif on decka as a girl that Zack hit on in few episodes..She's known in LA.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by AshleyBarby (talk • contribs) 20:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
I did not wrote abaout myself...i'm from turkey so i don't now english very much! i have her album and i'll send you a link if you want to her 1 of her songs —Preceding unsigned comment added by AshleyBarby (talk • contribs) 21:44, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
I did establish!!! i even put a link to one of her songs!! ur just dumb and don't follow the music..she was on mtv the other day!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by AshleyBarby (talk • contribs) 15:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
why delete Destoria? one of the guitarists has a serious head injury and this is a bio of what they have done don't you have a heart? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Revtv (talk • contribs) 11:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Now no one knows about the band as there is no information on here? it took me ages to write and you should have sent me a copy before you deleted it you are out of order there was nothing harmful written all you had to do was let me know i needed to alter it to fit within the guidelines now I will never be able to write the same article as that. Could you message it to me so i can put on my website instead of wikipedia thank you :) Revtv —Preceding unsigned comment added by Revtv (talk • contribs) 11:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Bump The Show
You deleted this page yet the significance of the show is that it is a docu-drama exploring the issue of abortion in a way that engages the audience to make the choice for the women on the show. I am pretty sure that is a first and a unique application of a pick your own adventure style to new media. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 00:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- The article was deleted because it did not provide any citations to coverage of the show from third-party, reliable sources. The only sources provided were from the show's website, which does not establish its notability. Please see the Wikipedia guidelines on notability for web content. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:45, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- The article was deleted because it did not establish why the comic is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:47, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Hey. Just letting you know I nommed this for GA status. I think that if we keep putting work into this, we could soon nominate it for FA status, and get it on the main page in April. Would be nice to see if we can pull it off. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 01:46, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Novastor Online Backup
What is your problem deleting that page "Novastor Online Backup"? It's mentioned in other articles and there is no need to create a new site about it? Please explain your decision to me before you delete my contributions unremarked. That's pretty unfair!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Walter-hh82 (talk • contribs) 09:38, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Hey, I changed my thing and you still deleted it
please restore ´Khamah nambala´
i would like to know why u deleted that ´Khamah nambala´ please restore it. 06:16, 27 January 2010 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) deleted "Khamah nambala" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khamanambala (talk • contribs)
User:18.104.22.168 and SpikeyRussia
Hi Gogo, Since you did this, I thought you might want to know about this, and this. User:SpikeyRussia needs to go, and perhaps a rangeblock for IP 22.214.171.124 - 126.96.36.199 is in order, although that is admittedly an extreme measure. But, something needs to be done about this twit. Wine Guy Talk 04:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello Gogo Dodo,
i am new here in the us-wiki and i wondered why the micro-donation article (in germany we call it "mikrospenden") isn't up to date and in the correct form.
now, i took some changes and it would be great, if you could support me in my wish, to make this article an official, correct wikipedia-contribution.
would be great to hear from you, soon!
- hello and thanks for your fast reply. i think, the micro-donation is quite actual, now. there are 2 messages (1. the article needs additional citations... and 2. this article is a stub. this looks like the thematic isn't up to date or the article isn't correct. what can i / we / others do to change this?
Thanks for the welcome
Hi Gogo Dodo!
Would you mind explaining the reason for which you deleted the CashedKingdom Records wiki page? I'm not quite sure that I understand why it was removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 23:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- The article was deleted because it did not establish why the company was notable enough for inclusion per the notability guidelines for companies. See the notability guidelines for musical artists, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Part of User:HoaryHambone's unblock request was a link to User:Zany Zebu Redivivus, which indicates multiple socks. Should this be consolidated somehow, or will that just inflame the situation? (See also: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Krazy Komodo. Apparently this has been going on for some time. Steamroller Assault (talk) 01:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Deleting others' comments from Editor Review
I'm wondering if I should remove a comment from User:Nothughthomas from WP:Editor review/antiuser. The user is trying to discredit me because of their objection to this incident report I started about them last night. I don't want someone to stumble upon their comment on my ER and take it as true, not knowing this user's history of disruption, but at the same time I feel that I can't directly comment on there without breaking WP:NOTTHEM (even if this isn't an unblock request) or fueling the drama. What do you think is the best course of action? Just leave it alone? Thanks for your time, XXX antiuser eh? 19:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure what to do about this. I have tried warning this user several times, and when I did get a response it was laced with some combative language. I think he/she must have some sort of "net nanny" filter on his/her computer which tries to delete all offensive words or something. In any event, the end result is vandalism. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Happy Gogo Dodo's Day!
User:Gogo Dodo has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
A record of your Day will always be kept here.
Please reactivate account
Dear Gogo Dodo, I am requesting you that, please reactivate my following account which you have blocked. Account Name : AmenderTechnologies
And please restore my user page, that was you deleted. I will edit the article by using guidelines. After that I will close this Mictesting123 account permanently & I will use AmenderTechnologies account. Please Please Please ...It's a request.
Thank you for your kind & quick reply
Dear Gogo Dodo,
I know this is user violation because of my account : AmenderTechnologies. But I am requesting you that please release that account & block my this Mictesting123 account. So that I will use only one account & that is : AmenderTechnologies. So after that it wouldn't called as user violation because of Mictesting123 will be blocked. You please keep my only one account in use, that is AmenderTechnologies & block Mictesting123. I give you word that I will not use this Mictesting123 account after that. AmenderTechnologies account is very important for me. Please do the needful. Mictesting123 (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Restoration of page
Dear Gogo Dodo,
Ok it's fine. Do not release my AmenderTechnologies account, but can you restore that deleted page from AmenderTechnologies account to my Mictesting123 acoount on my user page section ??? That page is very important & I have been taken efforts to create it.....please. Mictesting123 (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
I know that but I deleted that page from user page section of my Mictesting123 account and copied that page in user page section of AmenderTechnologies account. And after that you deleted that page from user page section of AmenderTechnologies account. So right now I haven't that page. Please restore that page in Mictesting123 account.
Hey, just so you know, this looks like just another new user who has been biten, badly. Why don't you look in his contribs? I have already asked the blocking admin why he did, but he hasn't answered yet. Honestly, stop biting the newcomers. How will Wikipedia survive if you infa-block every new users that joins? Ajraddatz (Talk) 04:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Dear Gogo Dodo,
Thank you for your reversion of the article Adriano Espaillat.
This article has been VANDALIZED and PAGE BLANKED several times over the past 24 hours.
Even after being restored by an Administrator, the page was BLANKED within a matter of minutes.
Some protection for this page may be appropriate.
Thank you again for your help.
Adriano Espaillat -- AGAIN
Dear Gogo Dodo,
As you can see, your own restoration of Adriano Espaillat was just PAGE BLANKED.
I believe this article needs some page protection.
- I don't think that is necessary just yet. The editor in question has been blocked for edit warring. If another editor appears, then semi-protection may be necessary (see WP:RFPP). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
- I was away for a bit - thanks so much, Gogo Dodo, for not only handling the user, but taking care of the BLP problem. JamieS93 21:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Re: Re: Favor: Send me a deleted page please!
I understand that you have no obligation to send me the deleted page (Jennifer Fabes) and that the second half of the page was a copyright violation (I'm not looking for that half of the page), I'm only asking for the favor because I did write the rest of the page myself, and while I understand it was an attack page I would like to be able to see what I had written on this subject quite some time ago. There were a few quotes on the page as well that I would like to have. So if you could send me the page minus the copyright violation I would be extremely appreciative. I don't know what to offer really, but I would be willing to contribute nearly anything for a chance to have the text I added to that page again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by B-Fir3 (talk • contribs) 05:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Message from John2228
Message from Jimm222888
Adriano Espaillat is under attack
Please look into the history of the following IP address:
I believe this person represents a vandal who has a clear motive to defame Assemblyman Espaillat. Please look into 'attacks' on his web page and then follow the (history of 184.108.40.206) trail to discover who this person is.
Also, the page has been corrected but misinformation can still be seen via a Google search of Adriano Espaillat because the info that comes up on said search is affiliated with what can be seen by clicking on the "Cached" link and not the corrected article.
Please advise because the last thing we need is sick people with a deceptive agenda using Wikipedia as a platform to lie about a good man.
- 220.127.116.11 has not edited for several days so there is nothing that needs to be done. You, on the other hand, removed content, which is not allowed. You also seem to have a connection to a registered editor. Finally, your IP address resolves to a network belonging to the New York State Assembly, so you probably shouldn't be editing the article anyways (see WP:COI and WP:ASFAQ). As for the Google cache, there is nothing I or anybody on Wikipedia can do about that. That is completely under Google's control. Eventually the Google cache will be updated with the current version of the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Ok, I have never taken information off personally or edited the page in any way. The IP address I am using is a universal address that represents a network consisting of hundreds of computers at NYSA so it is possible someone else did and frankly I don't blame them. If I see libelous information posted on this website about a friend or colleague with fake links I believe I have a duty and responsibility to remove it. Are you suggesting you wouldn't do the same if fraudulent info was posted about someone you know?
Please consider Wikipedia's own stated policy on this issue:
It is generally considered okay for you to edit your own article in certain circumstances:
* If the article is clearly derogatory in tone and was written based on questionable sources or no sources. * If it contains private information you strongly don't want shared, particularly if you are not famous. (This might include, for example, your e-mail address, date of birth, religious affiliation or sexual orientation.) * If you believe it is libelous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 19:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
If the information has already been removed, as was in this case, yet I discover the person doing the "attacking" has not only posted fake information but also represents a clear COI, I assumed you as an editor (with a stake in this community) would be interested. We as an online community cannot assist in character assassination by clearly non-neutral parties and I suggest this sight needs vigilante fact checkers considering the nature of the misinformation regarding multiple politicians in the NYC area. All I was suggesting was that if you looked at what IP address 22.214.171.124 had been doing after the attacks on Espaillat and Linaris you would discover the identity of a former politician with an obvious agenda to defame.
Perhaps I misunderstand the nature of this website and your particular role on it. I only wish a certain individual would "grow up" and stop using this website as a freelance platform to spread lies.
- The IP address 126.96.36.199 has still not edited any related article since your last message. All of the improperly sourced information on both the Espaillat and Linares articles have been removed and no edits have been done since then. So I'm not sure what you are expecting me to do. Blocking will not happen as blocks are preventative, not punitive. Since there have been no further edits by the IP or to the articles, there is nothing that needs to be done. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Although blocking is preventative and would serve a purpose, my estimation is that it would not go far enough. As I continue to research wikipedia and become more acclimated with the mores and rules that govern this online community I believe the thing to do in this case is to seek a ban of said hostile IP address. I do not have the time to continue monitoring this website to ensure only accurate information is posted. Although it is good that wikipedia is very popular, the downside is the ability to tarnish the reputation of a high profile person such as a politician for personal gain. There are obviously people with such a political motive who stand to capitalize on "political fallout" from such an attack. It is naive to assume this IP address will continue to behave once the dust has cleared.
Said hostile IP address has already posted much fraudulent information about the first two Dominican American Politicians in the United States. After the negative and false attacks this hostile IP address then went on to post "positive" information about a former NYS Assemblyman, one "Nelson Antonio Dennis". The day after the attacks said IP address added Nelson Antonio Dennis to a list of famous people from Washington Heights, the very district Espaillat represents. Said IP address then went on to complain about page vandalization on Espaillats page when someone blanked the libelous content he provided(how slick does this guy think he is, trying to make himself look like the good guy?). Said IP address then added in-line references to Nelson Antonio Denis wiki page and gave copy right permission for a picture of Nelson Antonio Dennis on his own page and on the page of the movie he directed, VOTE FOR ME!
Further more, (as if stated connections are not enough to show COI) this guy runs a website that has the same libelous info (plus some additional offensive content) that was posted on wikipedia, but on his website he calls it political satire. (If you need the domain address I can give it to you in the interest of dispute/conflict resolution but would rather not considering i wouldn't want to dignify the depraved and filthy content of the page). In conclusion said IP address represents someone with a clear agenda against Espaillat and Linaris while maintaining a favorable agenda to Dennis. IP address 188.8.131.52 cannot be trusted to conform to the ideas and principles of wikipedia editing and should therefore be banned from editing certain pages.
- I said it before and I'll say it again: 184.108.40.206 has not made any edits since the aforementioned incident, therefore no blocks or bans (IPs are generally not banned) are likely to be forthcoming. If and only if the IP returns will any action be taken. IPs like 220.127.116.11 are also dynamic: who uses 18.104.22.168 this month is not necessarily the same person last year or next year. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Message from 22.214.171.124
Regarding Assemblyman Adriano Espaillat's vandalism problem, his wikipidia could be updated from his office (NYS Assembly). It is not a political/ campaign related matter.
I am going to recreate the article and actually add the list, as I was going to do, but not had done yet. I also did not receive enough notification before deletion, as it was deleted at 02:48, but I received notification at 02:58. - Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 21:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Never mind. - Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 21:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains
Since the premiere yesterday (and even before that), there has been much vandalism to the Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains article. I suggested on the talk page to semi-protect the article because of this, but the only problem is I don't know how to semi-protect! If you agree to it, would you do everyone the favor of semi-protecting the article? —Untitledmind72 (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- And, one more thing, I just wrote up the Nielsen ratings for "Slay Everyone, Trust No One". Since it was a 2-hour premiere, I listed it as two separate time slots with their own stats. TVbytheNumbers.com also has the data for the single premiere, which should I put it as? —Untitledmind72 (talk) 20:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Message from Thankful777
Hi, Gogo Dodo, thanks so much for you message. The editing I did was absolutely not for any promotional purposes--- please read the changes and let me know what I can do to ensure you that it is true/factual and important information for the accuracy of Wikipedia articles (Thankful777 (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2010 (UTC)). Thankful777 (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2010 (UTC) Thanks so much!
Okay, thanks for your message. How can I change the tone for it to be appropriate?
Also, I checked out the neutral point of view and external link guidelines. I can find many citations to support the validity/reliability/factuality of the edits. I may be able to work on and complete this: do you have any suggestions, advice, guidance, help, etc you may be able to offer? Thanks so very much, Thankful777 (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2010 (UTC) (Thankful777 (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2010 (UTC)). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thankful777 (talk • contribs)
Ok, thanks very much: "instead of repeating what others have written" I will make factual statements that can also be 'backed up' or 'cited' then and make sure to not use capitals, mixed capitals, etc. Sorry and thanks for your help: please let me know if you have any other helpful guidance. Thankful777 (talk) 11:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC) (Thankful777 (talk) 11:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)).
Hi, i am very new to wikipedia and added a couple of external links to some pages in the internet marketing category. they were removed because of being called advertisments. they are in fact articles about internet marketing. yes, they have a resource box at the end of the article, but that is really acceptable as internet protocol.
the link was: http://vegasrecommends.com i would appreciate your review and inform me of how these articles really constitute advertisments. Truthfully, i see many, many links on wikipedia that lead to articles, and that was the reason i felt that articles were ok.
The articles really are not sales pages, and i really do understand keeping Wikipedia neutral in that area.
Please give me your comments to my email address at email@example.com
It's not necessarily wordy, but just getting into too much detail - but without checking I can't tell what was yours and what gets added afterwards. But things like "Jeff asking questions" or spelling out the actual events during a challenge are things that bloat it and encourage anons and others to add more. --MASEM (t) 23:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Listen, there might be a exile island in Survivor Heroes vs Villains. I know there has to be bcuz i just know it. But i think that Russell will find the Hidden Immunity Idol again. So, there might be a exile island. Bclrocks10 10:49, 12 February 2010 (EST)
Ya, about the exile island for [Survivor: Heroes vs Villains], i think there's no exile island bcuz i thought there was but there isn't. Ya, u were right. Bclrocks10 9:35 PM,(EST)
Our DJ friend is back
Bonnie Brooks Article
The Bonnie Brooks Article is of great importance to all of East Sussex and parts of West Sussex. Bonnie is a school girl musician and got millions of requests asking for a wikipedia page. But when these millions of people checked for her page it said you deleted it and now all of East Sussex hates you.
What to do with userpages like this?
Message from Viralinfectioncode45709
hi i made a page about myself but it was deleted, am i not allowed? it wasnt rude or ought bad —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viralinfectioncode45709 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Message from Afiresavesday
G7 of The Hazard
- No. There is no waiting period unless things have changed that I'm not aware of. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting Al-Ahbash page. I have been watching that page for quite sometime. In the next few days, there may be some attempts [some attempts have already been made by one of the Al-Ahbash proponent ] by the Al-Ahbash proponents to revert that page to their side as mainstream Muslims will be celebrating the birth of their Prophet (similar to Christmas). Best regards. AmandaParker (talk)
This is regarding the user Secisek  who happened to create Medak Diocese. I have complimented the article by creating articles for all the successive Bishops. A certain user St.Anselm  has been placing Deletion Tag (rather freely) for my articles, especially on Indian Theologians or those who served the Church in India. Using the Notability and Other Criteria (just as a muse), the user has been having a free run.
Please see R. Yesurathnam and Ch. Vasantha Rao who are members of the Medak Diocese in whose articles User StAnselm has been placing deletion tags. Kindly restrain the user from doing so.--Pradeep (talk) 14:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Question about notability
Hi there. Just wanted to inform you that this article which you deleted has been recreated by an administrator. The page has been deleted approximately eight times and apparently now the topic of the article is notable. The only verifiable reference given in the article is one link to The Independent that mentions the topic of the article merely once as a side-remark. The other 3 references are not verifiable for people outside the UK. Your comment as to why this article is now included in Wikipedia will be appreciated. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 13:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
I put Myachi up for AFD a couple years ago whereupon it was deleted. I've just discovered it has been recreated (has for quite a while now). It seems to have all the problems as the previous version (from what I remember), but there seems to be several news sources now. In your opinion, is it strong enough to not need an AfD, minus the fact it needs cleanup? -WarthogDemon 17:36, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
P.M.S Band Deletion
I was writing a page about that band.. it was my band, and i wanted to put it up there, to inform my old members, and fans where we ARE GOING... I dont understand your reason for deletion ... i was working on the page.... Please let me know why i cant put it up there, whilst so many other bands can put theirs up there.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lostpunkdc (talk • contribs) 21:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
online land planning
Why do you consider the link I added is spam? I want to externally link to a company that does land planning online, isn't that what this post is about?
Please explain why this link is considered spam to you.
Message from Popkinfot
i do not understand why you do this to me. i have just moved into this country and to this. i do not understand. i believe everyperson in this world deserves a chance at wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Popkinfot (talk • contribs) 21:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Why did you delete my message and don't say "It was not constructive" I have to be civil cause I was just flagged for "A Persona Attack" whatever. Make sure to check up on the [Hacienda Heights, California] page. I know a person who writes very inappropriate things on there. Just check everyday for four days. LSUzach53 (talk) 23:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Your buddy, [LSUzach53]
Your Choice, Dude
Well that's too bad. It seems to me that you are a decent enough person to want to get to the bottom of these culprits. Your choice, if you'd rather be monitoring me, than so be it. I have used Wikipedia for years, and have just became a member, its too bad im gonna get blocked for however long for sending you this message. I wished we could have been civil. Enjoy yourself protecting the worl from petty internet "criminals" like myself. Peace out dude. I don't believe I have to back down from sprading the truth. This is a free encyclopedia. Have fun Robocop! LSUzach53 (talk) 23:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
J G Wentworth & Associates accidental termination
Dear Administrator, please read the article and sources, its referenced and is documented, its documentation of a scam, so it is indeed negative, but unbiased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Informationnest (talk • contribs) 06:17, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
"Re your message: I read the article and deleted it twice. The first time was because you provided no references. The second was for the same reason and it was also a copyright violation since you copied the single source's entire content into the article. As C.Fred pointed out to you, you must provide independent reliable sources for your claims in the article. And with such extraordinary claims and disparaging phrases that you used (please see our neutral point of view policy), multiple reliable sources are critical. I suggest that you work on the article in your user space. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)" .
Thank you for your suggestion, i will address all issues raised, is it okay if i ask for aid closed to the end. thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Informationnest (talk • contribs) 06:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the advise, its just I am kinda new to this, but I am teachable, and i learn fast, I ll make sure I ll make less mistakes in the future, Thank you again for pointing that out, enjoy editing MaenK.A.Talk 19:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for the positive comment, And you are right the articles needed deletion, no matter what was the reasons, thank you again :-) MaenK.A.Talk 21:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Please restore the page Cleudodentosteinism. It is a culmination of many hours of work by some followers of our small religion and we bilieve that we should be allowed to have a page on here for our religion just as any faith does. We have been gravely insulted to have our religion called a hoax. We do not have the funds to create a page of our own and without websites such as this one we fear that nobody in the wider world will ever learn the benefits of our faith and intime it could die out. ' —Preceding unsigned comment added by SteinfanT (talk • contribs) 22:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Sock you blocked
I noticed you blocked a couple earlier changing URLs on corporate websites. I'm positive this is a longer-term vandal. I caught a few last week. Checkuser found a sockfarm of 25. I'm going to get these latest ones looked at, too. See here if you're interested. -- Flyguy649 talk 03:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
I am the creator of the page for Astral Earth, they are in fact a band. I appologise that I was not able to prove this yet. I do have sources for Coatfest 2009 and the band itself. I was not given enough time to finish my page. Coatfest was a concert we held for Coats for Kids in Mentor, Ohio. If you want I can give you a link to our facebook message sent out to people for Coatfest. In fact if you google coatfest it is the first link. They do have numerous songs written it's just that I was not able to put their titles up yet, I also have a link for the actual songs as well. I would appriciate it if my page was brought back up so that I may continue my work. They may not have been the "fathers of rock" but they did raise $400 for coats for kids and that for a group of 6 of us working for coatfest is quite a bit.
I think we can make a request now, though we would have to time it right when there are 4 requests and have the blurb pre-made and ready to go. I put it on the request section on the talk page. Hopefully it'll be put up, it would make sense to given that it's very recent history that people will read. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 22:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
- Another article's requesting April 9 as well, so the chances of it happening are unfortunately not that great. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:43, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yes; I'm going by what's listed at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/pending. We could still put something up when one of the five is taken down, though it might be overwritten by that other article. Doesn't hurt to try anyway I guess. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:51, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Why did you delete the original Gnome Hut article? I am adding a new one that hopefully will not be deleted. Can you tell me what I can do to keep this one from being undeleted? Vyasar —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frees340 (talk • contribs) 00:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Please help with an edit filter problem
I can't figure out what caused this editor to set off the filter. None of the watch words seem to appear in either the lines he added or the whole article before or after. Am I reading the code wrong? Either way, this filter has been set off twice in the past few days, and is very difficult to work with because even false positives are still often controversial edits that I'd be hesitant to add myself. —Soap— 01:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Please Mr. Gogo Dodo.
This article Advice_(band) was written today by myself. "Advice" is a band very known on my city! I'm a friend of some members band and my intention is to informate that this band exists as well his history and works.
This band is maintaining contact with some person around the world and i think is important to share information about them (Advice).
I'm sorry if i'm doing something wrong, i've readed "help writing your first article" and i'm trying to correct some standards as well the layout.
I'll commit me to correct the article and i hope and ask the Wikipedia team is a little more patient.
How can I fix this situation?
Alright Mr. Gogo Dodo, thank you for your explanation! I'll be more patient and wait their new album. Greetings.
Message from Omm001
hey there , i didnt continue my article can u re send me it please i didnt save it i just want to send it to my freinds. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omm001 (talk • contribs) 20:16, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
David Mertz - zombie AfD listing in software deltion sorting and archive
The AfD for David Mertz is still appearing regularly at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Software and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Software/archive even though the article was deleted March 1st. I don't know how to fix that but I'm hoping you can bring it to the attention of someone who can. Thanks! Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 22:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
CSD tagging and reverting
Thanks for the info you left on my talk page. I may be wrong, but wasn't there a speedy deletion tag on Nuclear Sperm? I was under the impression the creator shouldn't delete the tag, and I believe that is what I was trying to revert. Is the policy then that the originator of the article can blank the whole page, including delete tags? Thanks, your comments help me understand the process. Bento00 (talk) 16:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
On my page SkyRebel Communications Manifesto, you deleted it because it "had no significance." So just because it isn't significant to you means there's no way it could ever matter to someone else, right? How about if you are going to delete my article because you feel it isn't significant you mark it with a speedy deletion tag so I can contest it. I was already contesting someone else who believes that if they haven't heard of it, it's gotta be spam and just pure vandalism. skyrebelquinn 18:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skyrebelquinn (talk • contribs)
- Well, you got yourself blocked, but just in case you happen to read my talk page, I'll answer here... As others attempted to point out to you, the problem was of notability. The article was deleted because there was "No explanation of the subject's significance", which is very different than "had no significance". Your article didn't state why your new organization was significant and met the aforementioned notability guidelines. I didn't delete the article because of it being potentially spam as I did not think it was. I suggest you read the Organizations FAQ as it answers many of the questions you probably have on why something is or is not allowed on Wikipedia regarding your organization. I do wish you good luck with it and I hope you group succeeds. Hopefully it will and somebody else can will write the article about your organization as you will be too busy running it to write about it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Adenhart - TFA request
The article's now at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests. One of the points is for the main contributor's first TFA, which would be you, so if you can confirm that it would be helpful. And of course you can support it too. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 00:41, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
I was about to draft a request at AIV when you spotted this user's edits and tackled him. Aside from the religious distribe, which these people probably don't want on their userpages, the content is problematic because it contains categories and other transcludables which are now showing the userpages up on lists in articlespace. I'm happy to go through and tag or courtesy blank them if it will help clear up the mess, or is it best for an admin to delete them if there's a suitable rationale? Karenjc 21:04, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Question answered. That was quick! Karenjc
Problem with Bclrocks10
I know you must be aware about the actions by Bclrocks10 (talk · contribs). And his edits are now annoying me as well as first removed the "Isla Purgatoryo" info columns then repeatedly added a "Switched Tribe" beside a contestant when that contestant was not part of the switch and only return at the point of the merge. Did this guy do enough to be reported and blocked? Thanks in advance. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 10:19, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey Gogo, you blocked User:Carlos Colombia earlier today--guess what, I went through the article history of Jason Taylor (guitarist) while I was compiling a case at AfD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Taylor (guitarist)), and found a whole bunch of BLP violations made by indef-blocked users--User:Mex Ray Trex is a puppet of User:Human Rights Believer, as is User:Barnsey Boo, and when I looked through the latter's contributions I found that both Carlos Colombia and Barnsey Boo have "worked on" Future plc and the aforementioned Jason Taylor. What do you think? Should I file a sock puppet case? Do you shoot ducks from where you're sitting? (Do dodos dig ducks?) Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- There's more: Carlos and Barnsey have "worked" on Holly Willoughby, as has User:Berkshire Hunt, another indef-blocked user (this one just for vandalism), who also contributed to Jason Taylor and Future plc. Quack! Drmies (talk) 20:39, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- User:Metrospex (creator of Jason Taylor (guitarist) and their puppet master User:Sinbad Barron have edits on the same articles, as does IP 126.96.36.199, who reverted one of my reverts on Jason Taylor and has also edited Future plc and Ken Barlow (Coronation Street) (like Carlos). Drmies (talk) 20:47, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
veDrò (think tank)
Hi Gogo Dodo, you deleted my page about veDrò because I didn't respect the Article 7 (about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). Can I prove the importance of these subject with a press review? or How can I do? Thank you Emafra (talk) 17:43, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
about spooler (utm)
hi sory, i can not speak english very good. i make an article, my article was about Spoooler(utm), but yout deleted this article :( for what? can you help me? Spooler is an UTM, this is such az best firewalls and ... tnx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahdifox (talk • contribs) 07:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains
I understand that it was not mentioned on the episode but if you go onto youtube and type in Survivor: Heroes vs Villains - Secret Scene: Randy there is actual footage of them talking about it. I understand your changing of my edit, I just wanted to change what was previously there because it was inaccurate.
I posted that last comment just so you know. If you could reply to my page that would be great.
Sorry that i keep doing this but i keep forgetting to sign in. I posted that comment and i am the one who made the original edit. Sorry for doing all of this —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hallpriest2 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Thulnar deleted page
There was no reason for Thulnar page to be deleted. It didn't contained any image, but otherwise it was following Wikipedia standards. It had a meaning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unnamed one0 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello Gogo Dodo. As you may know, I've been monitering User:Bclrocks10's edits since he was posting disruptive comments on my talk page. Recently, he has been repeatedly changing colours on Survivor season pages without discussion, however he has pretty much ignored my warnings for him to stop; his only response was showing me another instance of where the colours where changed and asking me to revert it. I've even told him how to discuss colour changes. The most recent changes were on Survivor: Marquesas and Survivor: Borneo. I've told him several times to stop now. I'm not sure whether or not it's a blockable offense. I just don't know what to do right now. -- 13:39, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Don't you think that was a bit quick to delete this? We were going to work on it more today. We have number of people that were going to be working on this today. And now it is gone. Can you please put it back. -Michael.kutch (talk) 13:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 15:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted Article : Shri Laxmi Narayan Dev Vadtal Gadi Acharya Parampara
Hi, i posted about subjected article yesterday but it has been deleted by you, i don't understand the reason, if it is just a copyright issue then please let me know because the site called www.swaminarayanvadtalgadi.org is being operates by us. so if u need copyright permission then let me know how can i send you permission letter and where ? my wiki user name is Hari1008 and my name is pranav Thanx
- My pleasure, i hope there was a nice "WHAM!... THUMB" when you hit struck them down with the banhammer. :) Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
the deletion of SirVincent Rogers made no sense whatsoever. You claimed it was a duplicate of Creative Artists Agency in your reasoning, but last time i checked, SirVincent was an NFL player and not an artists agency.. RF23 (talk) 17:53, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
I am the creator of the First Northern Bank page. I believe you are the one who placed the "general notability guideline" notification on the page. I have since added sources and information about the significance of the bank being one of twelve banks in California over 100 years old. I have also added information on the bank's focus on alternative energy. I was wondering if this is enough to have you remove the notability tag? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richjordana (talk • contribs) 18:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Message from Devynpie
Hi, apologies for the addition of this page. I was unaware of the restrictions. Why do some retailers have a page authorised? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ennkay77 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm trying to create the "Mitchell mcdonald" page, which is about myself. I'll allow this personal attack against myself. What information do you request to confirm that I'm Mitchell mcdonald? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctoppy (talk • contribs) 21:31, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Message from Sbhullar
Why you being obtuse, i made the changes! I explained SuMaFa is an organisation and that we are significant because of our cult following. Please stop being obstructive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbhullar (talk • contribs) 04:36, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
I try to go to "Shawnee High School (Oklahoma)" and Wiki tells me that you deleted the page. I vaguely remember seeing it a few weeks ago when I added a link from there to the web site of my graduating class from there. I really don't understand how/why anyone would erase a page about a high school. Could you explain??LargeAllen (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleting Links to High School Class Sites
I'm re-posting 'cause I can't see anyway to "reply" to your reply of my first post. You deleted "Shawnee High School (Oklahoma)". What needs to be done to restore it, or remake it, or whatever, for the school does/did exist and deserves just as much exposure as the other schools of the same, or similar, name. That said, if the restoration needs someone to make changes so the other user's vandalism can be compromised, I have the time and are willing to do so, assuming what I do isn't scrutinized down to the letter or word. I also want to say that yearly class sites for a high school, or college, should not be deleted because you think they are not of general interest. My contention is that they ARE of general interest. They, of course, belong as a subset of the school, not the town. For you to chase these kinds of links (& they are simply links, not wiki pages) seems to me a waste of your valuable time.
So, I'd like my school's page(s) restored. I'll be glad to help in it's restoration. And, you need to spend your time doing better things than looking for school class links because someone, somewhere, doesn't care about that school & that class. Remember this: for every person who uses Wikipedia there exists tons of useless information that could be deleted and that person would never miss it. Besides, there is already tons of these class links already on Wiki. Do you really want to spend your time trying to find them all, when there are vandals of all types trying to trash up the world of Wikipedia?LargeAllen (talk) 16:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Gogo Dodo pages
Hi, it appears that someone is creating pages with your name (Gogo Dodo 2, Gogo Dodo 6 etc..) with the comment "Created page with 'Hi, hi, hi! I'm a sock puppet of Gogo Dodo! I've changed my IP.-". I'm not sure you're aware of this - I also don't know how it should be dealt with unless they're a blocked user. Cheers, Clovis Sangrail (talk) 12:12, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey, guy! What do you think about a change on the blue color of theAngels Roster Template? I believe this almost-black colour does not reflect their actual colours. I also think a grey/silver color would be good, instead of blue.
I decided not to change it now, but I tried a bit with "show preview". Perhaps you should try it too, with colours #002255 #00294F and #C4C4C4. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aladdinlee (talk • contribs) 23:26, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:24, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
I tagged an article about a radio station for deletion, there was no primary sources, and the article seemed promotional, another editor removed the tag, and claimed on my talk page that any licensed Radio is notable, how about that?? I ve read most of the Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) but could not find some thing specific, please help on that :-). Second are all these articles notable and should be kept?? Takafumi Hori, Shigetoshi Hasebe, Yuji Ito, Kazuhisa Iijima, Yasuo Manaka, and many more, isn't there this policy??. And third, is this tag on this page correct Get thin?? thank you, and if you please replay to my talk page MaenK.A.Talk 15:11, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- what about radio stations that are not broadcasting yet, 107.3 FM Middle Musquodoboit, Nova Scotia??
Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains
Hello Mr. Dodo! I came here to ask you about the noting of the NCAA conflict on the above Survivor article. My view is we should keep it up there. Although other seasons don't have the footnote in the ratings table, there's plenty of other differences between Survivor articles—they're not all exactly the same format. There's plenty of differences; for example, Survivor: Guatemala has Reward and Immunity Challenge descriptions for only the first few episodes, then it's dropped. Some seasons, like Samoa, have extremely long episode summaries with near-useless information, while others have none (Heroes vs. Villains has the perfect amount). So, the footnote in the U.S. Nielsen ratings table tells why there might've been a drop in viewers for that episode. It's a good piece of info to put in. If we can find past schedules, I'll be happy to add the footnotes in previous seasons. —Untitledmind72 (talk) 13:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting and blocking BrianTheVillain123/Bclrocks10's harassment. Hopefully he learns from his mistake. Btw, I would not be surprised if he evades his block. He once told me that if we blocked him, he would create another account. We'll just have to look out for BrianTheVillain-like edits. Cheers, --00:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC)