User talk:76.113.1.202: Difference between revisions
→Edit warring: new section |
You have been blocked from editing to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. (TW) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
You just came back from a 48 hour block, and you start edit warring immediately? If you do not stop, you'll find yourself blocked for a week or more. ---<font face="Georgia">'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]'''<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">TheFortyFive</span>]]''</sub></font> 03:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC) |
You just came back from a 48 hour block, and you start edit warring immediately? If you do not stop, you'll find yourself blocked for a week or more. ---<font face="Georgia">'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]'''<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">TheFortyFive</span>]]''</sub></font> 03:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
== November 2011 == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' temporarily from editing for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 18:54, 17 November 2011 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
|||
:''If this is a [[closed proxy|shared IP address]], and you didn't make the edit, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
|||
Revision as of 18:54, 17 November 2011
October 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Westies. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 21:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Westies. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 04:05, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Westies, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 03:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Edit warring at Westies
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Someone requested semiprotection of Westies at WP:RFPP. It is more logical to block you, since you are the one who keeps editing with no regard for consensus. This block can be lifted if you will agree to seek support from others and wait to get it before changing the article again. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:24, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Edit warring
You just came back from a 48 hour block, and you start edit warring immediately? If you do not stop, you'll find yourself blocked for a week or more. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 03:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:54, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.