User talk:Breawycker

welcome to my talk page! Here you talk to me about my contributions! (Note if you are here to complain about something I did with AWB, Huggle, or anything else like this, please go here. Thank you, Breawycker Breawycker (talk) 00:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

confirmation edit--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 22:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 394325674a21a704997d33bb6e4363df

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

The Signpost: 26 September 2011

• Opinion essay: The global mission, the image filter and the "German question"

• Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews

• News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content

• In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references

• WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles

• Featured content: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: "Broadly construed" explained, voting begins on Senkaku Islands case, invitation to comment on CU/OS candidates

• Technology report: 1.18 deployment on track, "mythical" Git migration scheduled, editor decline statistics improved

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Hilton Kelly

Hello Breawycker. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hilton Kelly, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A dedication of a performance hall is a sufficient claim of notability to cast doubt on CSD A7. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 22:10, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Your comments at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sanjaydasgupta54

Thank you very much.

I am new to the article creation/editing side of Wikipedia, and am eager to learn the ropes, so thank you for the feedback. I'm somewhat unclear about the issues noted (though I have followed and read all the hyperlinked material), so allow me to ask a few questions:

• If my username seems to imply that I am the same person that created the free, open-source software (VisualLangLab) that is the subject of the article requested to be moved, that is correct. However, the article's language merely abbreviates claims already on the website, and shouldn't be construed as advertising -- not any more than Wikepedia articles like JavaCC and ANTLR (which also feature other free, open-source software tools in the same category).

• However, I do understand the violation of the COI policy, and would like to ask what my options are. I can state my affiliation with the VisualLangLab website on my User page as suggested, but would that be adequate (I do understand that the eventual content of the article will be determined by consensus among a group of editors)? Or do I just allow this page to be deleted, and then request someone else to create an article with the same name?

Thank you very much for your help with this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjaydasgupta54 (talk • contribs) 02:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Hey there. Although I'm not related to the message Breawycker put on your talk, I can help you with it. The statement of your COI on your userpage, and possibly at any reviews the article undergoes later in its life (see WP:GAN for example) is a good idea. When writing your article, which looks ok at a first, quick glance, try to pause after every few paragraphs and read it over. If it sounds like a sales pitch (Only one tap of a button! Free microwave oven if you buy now!), then you should consider rewriting it to remove the ad-like atmosphere. Try basing it off of Java CC, for example. Remember to add a variety of reliable sources. If you need any more help, ping me on my talk page. Buggie111 (talk) 02:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2011

• News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy

• In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts

• WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand

• Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan

• Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:49, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

• Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians

• News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised

• In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist

• WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People

• Featured content: The weird and the disgusting

• Arbitration report: Senkaku Islands closes; administrators authorized to place articles on discretionary sanctions

• Technology report: 1.18 deployment and HTTPS switchover completed, but developer help now needed with new projects

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:05, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: 1989 China Avant-Garde exhibition

Hello Breawycker. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 1989 China Avant-Garde exhibition, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a copyvio or source is public domain or under another free compatible license. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 19:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)