User talk:Wikiport

Welcome!

Hello, Wikiport, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Guettarda (talk) 07:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fox News Channel, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 12:11, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Fox News Channel, you will be blocked from editing. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 16:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

You have been warned repeatedly for threatening editors that write or delete matter that is contrary to your liking. I would appreciate it if you stop. Thanks! Wikiport (talk) 08:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Fox News Channel

This article clearly does not fit WP:CSD#G10. Please do not make bad faith speedy nominations - you should use the articles talk page if you have problems with the articles tone or neutralitly. Pedro :  Chat  10:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Please don't template the regulars. Also please note that my removal of your bad faith G10 nomination was not a hinderance to Wikipedia - you placing the template without discussion was disruptive. Pedro :  Chat  11:17, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I will grant this, only because it seems clear you will continue to waste my time in reversions. It meets the criteria, and fits the template. Check 1-10. Wikiport (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

It does not meet the letter of G10 (only to disparage the subject). It most certainly does not meet the spirit of the criteria. I am not wasting your time by declining speedy deletion (note - not a reversion). You are wasting your time with these nominations. please use the articles talk page. Pedro :  Chat  11:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct; it doesn't meet the bill for G10 in it's entirety if you fail to read the article. There are plenty of attack editorials within the page that does meet the criterium. Wikiport (talk) 11:32, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Please do not mis interpret my comments. The article does not meet G10. Full stop. It will not be deleted by any administrator under that criteria. Full stop. Pedro :  Chat  11:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I agree, I will let it fester it the discussion. I'm only bringing something to light here. I see what you are saying about the G10. It was a stretch...Wikiport (talk) 11:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Removal of editors comments

Do not remove other editors comments on talk pages as you did here [1]. You are now on the verge of disrupting wikipedia to make a point and will be blocked if you continue. Pedro :  Chat  11:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I am free to tailor my talk page. Thanks! Wikiport (talk) 11:38, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Please actually click on the diff. It relates to the article talk, not your user page. Pedro :  Chat  11:41, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

You have been continually warned on your talk page, and here. Your point is made and there is no further discussion needed regarding this subject. I don't subscribe to the "last word" comments. Thanks! Wikiport (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

1) Do not not come to my talk with a heder of "threats". 2) You are warning me ? Really? I've made it very clear here - you have made several point violations by bad faith nominations and removal of editors comments on talk pages. Feel free to remove this thread but I will not tolerate disruption by you. Pedro :  Chat  11:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I established the HEADER of "threats" on your talk page to illustrate the point that you won't let this issue die. Thank you for your input on the G10 stipulation, I feel you have done all you can. Now, again, please stop contributing to my talk page as you are failing to illustrate anything useful and you are attacking me. I apologize if I have caused you discomfort in your venture. Thanks again! Wikiport (talk) 11:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm not attacking you Wikiport. I'm telling you I'm going to block you if you disrupt wikipedia to make a point. Simple really. So, we've moved on, you realise G10 was wrong, and we can use the article talk to try and improve the issues youve raised about the article. Conversation done here, encyclopedia building commences. Pedro :  Chat  11:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your input on the issue. I didn't realize the template use originally. Wikiport (talk) 12:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Here's a tip, don't insult admins. :) —§unday {Q} 01:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Sound advice! To be honest, I didn't realize he was acting as a sysop, I thought he was just trying to argue. I'm glad I realized he was actually trying to help (and that he was quite patient!) Wikiport (talk) 04:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:Blaxthos. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 11:39, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

It seems you continually seek the "last word" in this issue, as you have with others. May I suggest to you finding some of the different "talk" forums on the internet? Thanks! Wikiport (talk) 22:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

That's enough. Wikiport, one more uncivil comment like that and I'll blocking you. There is no need for "sock puppet" allegations. Let me be clear: do not insult others and do not attack others personally. Follow the civility policy or you will be prevented from editing here. If you make another "suggestion" like this, you will be blocked for a very long time. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:00, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

One thing I'd like to point out that ending a comment with thank you, or have a nice day does not necessitate that the entire warning is civil. Just a heads up wikiport, as I've noticed it in quite a few of your comments on userpages. ;) ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 04:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

ANI proceedings

I have reported your conduct to ANI here. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 02:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

That is the wonderful aspect of Wikipedia Blaxthos! Thanks for using the tools at your disposal, I hope you get the outcome you seek. In the mean time, I will make every effort to contribute to the community. Thanks! Wikiport (talk) 02:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

I think it would be helpful if you responded there. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

I have reviewed your editing, and found it extremely poor. Your content changes are adding fuel to the fire rather than assist to address the problem you see, this was particularly disingenuous, and your comments to users have an acidic tone. This is your final warning: either edit with respect for other editors, otherwise you will be banned. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 05:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

ANI Revisited

I have now reported your conduct to ANI a second time here. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 11:52, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing, and unfounded accusing of Blaxthos being at fault. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~~~~