Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paperless society: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate; result was delete |
m oops, I know you Steve's hate that... |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> |
||
The result was '''delete'''. |
The result was '''delete'''. Steven is of course correct that needing cleanup is generally not considered a valid argument for deletion. However, there is a consensus here that this article is so flawed that there is no content in it which ''can'' be cleaned up and made into an appropriate encyclopedia article. I also note that nobody has undertaken the task of re-writing the article, which could have prevented this outcome. No prejudice whatsoever against recreation at any time as a proper article. [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 23:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
===[[Paperless society]]=== |
===[[Paperless society]]=== |