Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bisa Williams: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:41, 30 May 2012

Bisa Williams

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:DIPLOMAT, has not yet been significantly involved in discussions or negotiations of historical importance. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:19, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And what about the general notability guideline? If she meets that then WP:DIPLOMAT is irrelevant. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The GNG is a presumption of notability, not proof of it. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:40, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 16:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)</small>
 *And what about the [[WP:general notability guideline|general notability guideline]]? If she meets that then [[WP:DIPLOMAT]] is irrelevant. [[User:Phil Bridger|Phil Bridger]] ([[User talk:Phil Bridger|talk]]) 15:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
+:*The GNG is a ''presumption'' of notability, not proof of it.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 15:40, 30 May 2012 (UTC)