User talk:Drunken Pirate: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Re: EastEnders |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Thanks for reverting the changes on the EastEnders character pages. — [[User:AnemoneProjectors|AnemoneProj]]''<font color="green">[[User:AnemoneProjectors/Esperanza|e]]</font>''[[User:AnemoneProjectors|ctors]] <small>([[User talk:AnemoneProjectors|talk]])</small> 23:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC) |
Thanks for reverting the changes on the EastEnders character pages. — [[User:AnemoneProjectors|AnemoneProj]]''<font color="green">[[User:AnemoneProjectors/Esperanza|e]]</font>''[[User:AnemoneProjectors|ctors]] <small>([[User talk:AnemoneProjectors|talk]])</small> 23:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
== [[Roland Abeysekra]] == |
|||
I am going to nominate [[Roland Abeysekra]] for deletion, but I've seen you acted before so it wasn't speedily deleted. If we can't source anything its either original research or madeup. :et me know if I'm missing something. [[User:Drunken Pirate|Drunken Pirate]] 12:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:No, I have no objections. I removed a speedy tag in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roland_Abeysekra&diff=42966574&oldid=42962670 this edit] because the reason given was "Article is a little too POV; and, if he was really this notable, you'd think he would have at least one google hit?", which is not a valid criterion for speedy deletion. If you want to nominate it, go right ahead. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 16:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:46, 6 December 2006
Re: EastEnders
Thanks for reverting the changes on the EastEnders character pages. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
I am going to nominate Roland Abeysekra for deletion, but I've seen you acted before so it wasn't speedily deleted. If we can't source anything its either original research or madeup. :et me know if I'm missing something. Drunken Pirate 12:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- No, I have no objections. I removed a speedy tag in this edit because the reason given was "Article is a little too POV; and, if he was really this notable, you'd think he would have at least one google hit?", which is not a valid criterion for speedy deletion. If you want to nominate it, go right ahead. Stifle (talk) 16:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)