Jump to content

User talk:Opinedsenior: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
August 2012: comment - info
Block notice
Line 25: Line 25:
::And yes, I was mad. I still am. [[User:Floating Boat|<font color="teal">FloBo</font>]] [[User talk:Floating Boat|<font color="navy">A boat that can float!</font>]] 11:29, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
::And yes, I was mad. I still am. [[User:Floating Boat|<font color="teal">FloBo</font>]] [[User talk:Floating Boat|<font color="navy">A boat that can float!</font>]] 11:29, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
:::Opinedsenior, You've been reported to [[WP:AN3]]. [[User:Mrt3366|<font face="verdana" color="#0000FF">Mrt3366</font>]] [[User talk:Mrt3366|<font face="century gothic" size="1" color="#0000A0"><sup>(Talk?)</sup></font>]] 11:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
:::Opinedsenior, You've been reported to [[WP:AN3]]. [[User:Mrt3366|<font face="verdana" color="#0000FF">Mrt3366</font>]] [[User talk:Mrt3366|<font face="century gothic" size="1" color="#0000A0"><sup>(Talk?)</sup></font>]] 11:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''2 days''' for persistent disruptive editing, including [[WP:EW|edit warring]] and a belligerent approach to other editors, sometimes constituting [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]]. Wikipedia works by collaboration and cooperation. When we disagree with other editors, we explain our opinions in a civil way, and attempt to persuade them. If it becomes clear that consensus is against us, we accept the fact, however reluctantly, and move on to other things. Please try to make sure, when the block expires, that you follow that procedure. It also looks very much as though you are continuing a pattern of disruptive editing and [[WP:BATTLEGROUND|battleground]] attitude to other editors that you started before you used this account. I think it is only fair to inform you that, had I been certain that this was the case, I would have blocked you indefinitely, and that could well happen if you continue in the same way. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson|talk]]) 13:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->

Revision as of 13:01, 2 August 2012

August 2012

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. STOP attacking the talk pages of involved editors, ONLY use the associated talk page/s of article/s in question. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 10:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see strike eagle brings himself along to any dispute with dbixray they are tag teaming for pov purposes Opinedsenior (talk) 10:43, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You will probably find that, like me, they saw what was happening in our normal cause of patrolling Wikipedia. You need to discuss the proposed (and reverted) changes on the article's talk page (not of the talk pages of the users involved). Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 10:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No they did not they have contact outside of wiki through email or other means and they come along to tag team Strike eagle was meant to "retire" and its funny how he comes back only into disputes along with Dbigxray I will present my evidence in time Opinedsenior (talk) 10:47, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make accusations you need to have proof - if you don't have it now don't make it now. You might also note that I am on wikibreak, yet here I am. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 10:55, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible to talk to you via email? Opinedsenior (talk) 10:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Talking on wiki is better (on my talk page if you wish), feel free to send me an email. But I reserve the right to put it onwiki or send it to anyone else if I want. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 10:59, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is it posssible to keep the first mail private? Opinedsenior (talk) 11:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well depending on what you say I might need to show it to an admin (etc). Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:16, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Out of interest what does "POK" mean? Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
PoK = Pakistan occupied Kasmir, often said in relation to:- Pakistan-administered Kashmir, whereas IoK refers to Indian-administered Kashmir. :) Richard Harvey (talk) 12:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I saw the changes you made while I was patrolling too. If I'd dared revert what you'd done, you may as well have thrown me in the accusations as well! FloBo A boat that can float! 11:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC) Note to other editors: I've been watching the article since I saw Opinedsenior deleting content at the article. [reply]
And yes, I was mad. I still am. FloBo A boat that can float! 11:29, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Opinedsenior, You've been reported to WP:AN3. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 11:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for persistent disruptive editing, including edit warring and a belligerent approach to other editors, sometimes constituting personal attacks. Wikipedia works by collaboration and cooperation. When we disagree with other editors, we explain our opinions in a civil way, and attempt to persuade them. If it becomes clear that consensus is against us, we accept the fact, however reluctantly, and move on to other things. Please try to make sure, when the block expires, that you follow that procedure. It also looks very much as though you are continuing a pattern of disruptive editing and battleground attitude to other editors that you started before you used this account. I think it is only fair to inform you that, had I been certain that this was the case, I would have blocked you indefinitely, and that could well happen if you continue in the same way. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]