User talk:184.70.5.58: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Electronic cigarette: When reviewing these edits, do you think you are entirely neutral in this topic area? |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. [[User:QuackGuru|<font color="Red">QuackGuru</font>]] ([[User talk:QuackGuru|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]) 17:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC) |
[[Image:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. [[User:QuackGuru|<font color="Red">QuackGuru</font>]] ([[User talk:QuackGuru|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]) 17:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC) |
||
You are continuing to make controversial edits. You deleted an image from the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Electronic_cigarette&curid=15087626&diff=610591312&oldid=610590540 relevant section.] The lede should summarise the body. I think there should be a summary of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Electronic_cigarette&oldid=610591312#The_lede_should_summarise_the_body usage statics section in the lede].[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&diff=prev&oldid=610570547]. The lede should have four paragraphs [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electronic_cigarette&curid=11996885&diff=610590132&oldid=610589701 not split into 5]. See [[WP:LEADLENGTH]]. When reviewing these edits, do you think you are entirely neutral in this topic area? [[User:QuackGuru|<font color="Red">QuackGuru</font>]] ([[User talk:QuackGuru|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]) 05:00, 29 May 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:00, 29 May 2014
May 2014
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Electronic cigarette, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:55, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Electronic cigarette with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 08:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Electronic cigarette
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. QuackGuru (talk) 17:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
You are continuing to make controversial edits. You deleted an image from the relevant section. The lede should summarise the body. I think there should be a summary of the usage statics section in the lede.[1]. The lede should have four paragraphs not split into 5. See WP:LEADLENGTH. When reviewing these edits, do you think you are entirely neutral in this topic area? QuackGuru (talk) 05:00, 29 May 2014 (UTC)