Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
archiving; let's get back to being an FLC talk page |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{dablink|For a "table of contents"-only list of candidates, see [[Portal:Featured lists/Candidate list]] and [[Wikipedia:Nominations Viewer]].}} |
{{dablink|For a "table of contents"-only list of candidates, see [[Portal:Featured lists/Candidate list]] and [[Wikipedia:Nominations Viewer]].}} |
||
__TOC__ |
__TOC__ |
||
== What to do when nominator gets banned? == |
|||
Concerning the [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of people on stamps of Azerbaijan/archive1|FLC]], of [[List of people on stamps of Azerbaijan]]. The nominator of the FLC, [[User:Twilight Chill]] has been [[WP:TBAN|topic banned]] from Azerbaijan related articles and will therefore not be able to respond to comments. Twilight Chill is also the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_people_on_stamps_of_Azerbaijan&action=history|main author] ([[User:Brandmeister]] is the same as Twilight Chill) of the list. Should the FLC be postponed, cancelled or just continue as it does? [[User:Bamse|bamse]] ([[User talk:Bamse|talk]]) 22:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:If someone is prepared to continue making changes then it continues. If we don't hear anything in the next week or so (and I've just added a heap of comments there) then we'll withdraw the nomination. It's not up to FLC to decide who can and who cannot edit Wikipedia... [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 22:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::OK. [[User:Bamse|bamse]] ([[User talk:Bamse|talk]]) 22:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::I will blue-pencil this list in the next days. Regards.--<span style="color:#A4D3EE; background-color:#E0EEEE;font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"> [[User:GreatOrangePumpkin|♫Greatorangepumpkin♫]] </span><span style="color:Black; background-color:#A4D3EE;font-family: 'Gigi'">[[User talk:GreatOrangePumpkin|T]]</span> 12:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== [[List of heads of state of the Soviet Union]] == |
|||
Would any of you care to review the [[List of heads of state of the Soviet Union]] list for me? It may fail due to lack of reviewer interest, can somebody just review the list. If so thanks, it's appreciated. --[[User:Trust Is All You Need|TIAYN]] ([[User talk:Trust Is All You Need|talk]]) 08:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Number of nominations allowed at once == |
|||
Hey I just want to clarify something; as I understand it, each user is only allowed to have one FLC open at once. If someone has a co-nominator for their lists, how many are they allowed to maintain at once provided the co-nominator(s) is (or are) active and helps out with the FLC? [[User:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Nomader</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size: 6pt">([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Talk</span>]])</span></sup> 05:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:Per the instructions, {{quote|A list should not be listed at Featured list candidates and Peer review at the same time. Users should not add a second FL nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed.}} |
|||
A nominator and co-nominator are considered the same in this respect. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 09:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:Alright, thanks for clearing that up. [[User:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Nomader</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size: 6pt">([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Talk</span>]])</span></sup> 18:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Re: Grammy Award for Best Contemporary R&B Album == |
|||
This nomination was a bit complicated, but I believe all concerns have been addressed and I tally five "support" votes. --<font color="navy">[[User:Another Believer|Another Believer]]</font> <sub>(<font color="cc6600">[[User talk:Another Believer|Talk]]</font>)</sub> 19:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Featured list on Main page == |
|||
Just to let every one here know, talk is going on about changes to the main page again, mostly about adding a Featured Sound section. I suggested while they are at it consider finally adding Featured Lists too. There is a discussion going on [[Talk:Main Page#Featured sounds proposal| Here]] and i think some regular FL contributors input would be greatly appreciated. --[[User:Found5dollar|Found5dollar]] ([[User talk:Found5dollar|talk]]) 01:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:If featured lists were to be featured on the main page, I'm pretty sure we could just list the lead in a small section instead of showing the actual list. Shouldn't be too difficult, I'd think. [[User:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Nomader</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size: 6pt">([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Talk</span>]])</span></sup> 05:54, 15 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::The discussion is only about Featured sounds. So if we want a section for FLs, we would have start a separate proposal.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 06:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yeah, I read that-- I'm pretty sure the idea of bringing FLs to the main page before has been met with some contention in the past. We'd have to create a viable way for FLs to be brought up there, and even then I'm not sure if it would garner a lot of support. [[User:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Nomader</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size: 6pt">([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Talk</span>]])</span></sup> 06:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::::I have started a proposal at [[Talk:Main page]], it would be nice to get the opinions of some of our regular contributors over there. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 10:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Long overdue. I'll be adding my tuppence. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] ([[User talk:Dweller|talk]]) 11:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
: I'll take a look as well. There are some great FLs that deserve some attention. --<font color="navy">[[User:Another Believer|Another Believer]]</font> <sub>(<font color="cc6600">[[User talk:Another Believer|Talk]]</font>)</sub> 16:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
===Specific proposal #1=== |
|||
I think the best thing to do is to do the brainstorming here, as a list-oriented community, and once we have a well-defined proposal, take it to the main page talk. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 03:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
{{hidden/FC|headerstyle=background:yellow;|contentstyle=border:1px lightblue solid; padding:10px;|header=Proposal capped; I'm 100% behind the one below |content= |
|||
''I have deliberately avoided stating how we would select a given week's specific main list, beyond designating topics. That process would inevitably be complicated, but more importantly has the potential to derail this entire process if focussed on too early. Therefore, I believe that we should <u>not</u> go into points systems or whatnot until we have consensus on the general system.'' |
|||
'''Vision:''' a small, [[WP:TFA|TFA]] style lead paragraph + picture for one list per week, followed by 2-3 [[WP:DYK|DYK]] style entries without pictures. All 3-4 lists in a given day should be on different topic. Over a period of time we should make sure that we carefully balance the need to give fair representation to less-covered topics, with the fact that a high proportion of our lists fall into a relatively narrow range of subjects. |
|||
'''First stab at the mechanics:''' 80% of the work will be choosing the lead list. There are 10 main topics at [[WP:FL]]: Arts, Engineering and technology, Everyday life, Geography and places, History, Language and linguistics, Mathematics, Natural sciences, Philosophy and Religion, and Social Sciences and Society. For the purposes of the lead list, I propose that we work in a 13-week (3 month) cycle. Mathematics should merge with Natural Sciences based on size, giving us 9 main topics, while Arts and Everyday Life should each have two slots in a cycle. The 12th week would be exclusively for underrepresented sup-topics of the 7 main topics that have one slot. Note that underepresented sub-topics would therefore have two opportunities in a cycle; their topic's week, and the 12th week. The 13th week is deliberately left ambiguous at launch, so that we have room for manouevre when the process is in its infancy. It's there if we need it, if not we go to a 12-week cycle. |
|||
So: the main lists over thirteen weeks would go something like: |
|||
1. Arts |
|||
2. Engineering and technology |
|||
3. Geography and places |
|||
4. Everyday life |
|||
5. History |
|||
6. Language and linguistics |
|||
7. Arts |
|||
8. Maths/natural sciences |
|||
9. Philosophy and religion |
|||
10. Everyday life |
|||
11. Social sciences and society |
|||
12. Underrepresented sub-topics |
|||
13. ??? |
|||
For the DYK style part, previous DYKs and previous "headline" lists would be excluded (as we have 2,000 lists and growing, and 150-200 spaces a year). A delegate would pick 2-3 DYKs from different topics to one another and the main list. Being a sub-list should preclude the list from becoming a "headliner" for a long time (but not indefinitely), so for this reason the original FL nominators should be informed at an early stage, giving them the opportunity to decline selection if they want (rare, but conceivable) and hopefully en-list their help. Once the picks are finalised, a small task force of FL regulars would make any necessary fixes and suggest blurbs, with the final say resting with the delegate. All of this could be done as far in advance as we liked; we could easily build up a pool of these entries. I would tentatively suggest that everyday life is usually included, to help alleviate the bottleneck that articles there are inevitably going to face. |
|||
It's not perfect, but initial thoughts? —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 03:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:Hmm... I just want to clarify a few points and give some suggestions: |
|||
:*Would previous DYK lists be excluded form being the featured headline list? |
|||
:*Would the 2-3 other lists be listed in the format of a DYK (i.e. "... did you know that [[List of New Jersey Devils seasons|the New Jersey Devils]] have won three Stanley cups?) or would we go with some other unique format? I'd love to be able to differentiate ourselves from DYK in some way, but I understand if it'd be easier to go with DYK style blurbs for our articles. |
|||
:*I think if a list is listed in this "DYK-style blurb", it should be eliminated from consideration as a headline article. Judging by the fact that it will no longer be given priority, unless there's a large exception, they shouldn't be brought back as there will be so many other lists behind them. |
|||
:I just have to admit, the idea of "Featured List Wednesdays" is really awesome. Putting that out there. [[User:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Nomader</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size: 6pt">([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Talk</span>]])</span></sup> 07:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::*Only excluded from being a smaller one. It's rare that a list makes it as a DYK, and we would then be consistent with articles. A featured article couldn't be a DYK twice, but could be a DYK and later a TFA. |
|||
::*By "DYK-style blurb", I'm thinking more in terms of length and the overall aim; being a short, sharp, catchy introduction. I definitely don't think we should introduce a list with "Did you know... that" |
|||
::*Perhaps if we have some sort of "opt-out" system, that would work. I.e. if someone feels that a certain list has a prose section worthy of top billing one day (be they the original editor or a director/delegate/insert title here planning ahead for difficult to fill topics), the list won't end up there. That's the least dramatic way I can think of doing it. As an example, of the three FLs I've gotten promoted so far (plus the one that I'm one creation spree away from nominating), I would only choose to opt [[List of Watford F.C. seasons]] out. |
|||
:::And yes, FL Wednesday sounds awesome. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 08:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::I tend to agree, the tentative suggestions at [[Talk:Main page]] for FL Wednesday are the ones I'd advocate. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 07:42, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
===Specific proposal #2 (a.k.a. "walk before run")=== |
|||
My view right now is relatively simple. |
|||
#We use the proposed featured sound proposal, but on Wednesday rather than Sat/Sun. |
|||
#We write a blurb in exactly the same way featured articles on the main page have. |
|||
#We (initially) select the list to be featured a few weeks in advance to allow for polishing etc, and the selection (initially) is by the directors. This may evolve into the current TFA model of suggestions, but as I said in the title, walk before run. |
|||
#We absolutely guarantee the community that lists we select will be verifiable, MOS-compliant (including ACCESS etc) etc etc and keep standards absolutely tip-top. |
|||
I think we have a great bunch of ideas in the section above, but I'm just focused on getting featured lists on the mainpage and if that means keeping it totally simple for the time being, so be it. We also get the coding of the front page effectively free as [[User:Adam Cuerden]] will be coding up the featured sound mods, and if we keep in-line with that, he'll code it with expansion to include FLs in mind too. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 17:55, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*I think this is what we should do now, walk before run. It is not even a sure thing that FLs will be on the main page.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 20:28, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*On reflection, as a starting point I think you're right. Keep it simple: one a week until we're up and running. Medium term, I think we could move to a rotation system, where each list is on for 6 hours. Directors aren't going to pick a list that's sub-standard to start with, so as long as we are confident that we have the ability to meet WP:V, four per week should be manageable. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 23:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*I think this seems like a great direction to move first. Put your toes in the water before you jump in, I guess. I think it's important that the lists we feature though definitely get held to a high standard, we really need to check for [[WP:ACCESS]] concerns and the like. [[User:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Nomader</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size: 6pt">([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Talk</span>]])</span></sup> 05:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*As Adam says, we need to be pro-active about this if we want to strike while the iron is hot. I've done a rough draft of one of my lists [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:WFCforLife/Box&oldid=414399834 here]. I think we need at least half a dozen samples, that are diverse in terms of field and (while accepting that there may be an inevitable degree of systemic bias towards English-speaking countries) geographic interest. I've done a sports list because that's what I know, but we need to give assurances that FL Wednesdays will not be dominated by sports, music and videogame minutiae (and for that reason it might be a good idea ''not'' to use mine). Perhaps if TRM were to select half a dozen decent lists that fit that criteria, and see if the original FL nominators would be willing to draft sample blurbs of ~1000 characters. If they aren't, we can always divide the work between ourselves. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 08:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
**Okay, how about the following: |
|||
**[[Bodley's Librarian]] - [[User:Bencherlite]] |
|||
**[[List of demolished places of worship in Brighton and Hove]] - [[User:Hassocks5489]] |
|||
**[[List of signs and symptoms of diving disorders]] - [[User:RexxS]] |
|||
**[[List of leaders of the Soviet Union]] - [[User:Trust Is All You Need]] |
|||
**[[List of battleships of the Ottoman Empire]] - [[User:White Shadows]] |
|||
**[[List of World Heritage Sites in Cuba]] - [[User:Grsz11]] |
|||
**These are simply "different" (i.e. not sports/discogs/awards) lists to show some of the diversity we have around the project. I'll try to get round to letting the nominators know but have a busy day ahead, so if someone else could step in, that'd be great...! Any other suggestions would be good too... [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 09:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::Wow, there's a vote of confidence in [[Bodley's Librarian]] (and from a Cambridge man too!) It is already in main page blurb style at [[Portal:University of Oxford/Selected article/10]]. Depending on how much space we've got, it might have to be trimmed a bit, but it's the size of an average TFA blurb (1,215 characters; [[WP:TFAR]] suggests 1,200, and today's TFA is 1,377). [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 09:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::::I've done the notifications (didn't realise you'd already replied Bencherlite!). I think ~1000 characters would be roughly the target. Judging by the current main page, my guess is that we would get about as much space vertically as TFA, but possibly less horizontally, and TFA uses 1200 characters. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 10:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Fair point. Got it down to 1,000 characters exactly (excluding "more..."!) at [[User:Bencherlite/TFA blurbs]]. [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 10:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Thanks for posting the notifications WFC. I think we should give it 48 hours for people to respond and if not, then either write the blurbs ourselves or select different starting lists. Once that's done, and once the featured sound proposal looks stable (in terms of support) then we'll move onto [[Talk:Main page]] with our own proposal. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 12:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:I'm in total support of using the lists as we've described in this section. I think in the future though after the initial batch, we should adopt portions of WFC's proposal above, such as a rotating system through each type of list each week. But these are just minor semantics; the most important thing is that the FL proposal work, and it seems like this does more than the trick. Good work everyone, and I'm fully behind this. [[User:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Nomader</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size: 6pt">([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Talk</span>]])</span></sup> 14:59, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::This all looks promising so far. I'll delve into this further today. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 15:23, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::: To give you somewhere to try things out I've created a page at [[User:RexxS/MainPageFL-Demo]] where you can get an idea of how things might look. That page transcludes the page [[User:RexxS/MainPageFL-Content]] where you can place pictures, text, etc. using ordinary wiki-markup. I've copied the blurb for Bodley's Librarian there as a trial. Please don't assume that the sizes I've used are precise representations of how the layout will turn out when Adam actually does the coding. I expect he will follow the current mainpage coding by using nested tables to get the desired effect <s>(which I haven't – so my quick and dirty mock-up won't behave the same way when text overflows, for example)</s>. I'd encourage you to replace the contents of [[User:RexxS/MainPageFL-Content]] with other candidate lists to try out how they might look. Hope that helps --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 18:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC) Edit: If others are going to look at it, I might as well mimic the MainPage as closely as I can. --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 01:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
(←)This is a very exciting proposal; well done to everybody who has got this moving so quickly! I appreciate the suggestion of using [[List of demolished places of worship in Brighton and Hove]] as one of the early lists; I shall write a blurb in the next 24 hours (probably in one of my many sandboxes) and supply a link. I'll also transclude it into RexxS's Demo page. <font face="Helvetica">[[User:Hassocks5489|<font color="#00BFFF"><b>Hassocks</b></font>]][[User talk:Hassocks5489|<font color="#228B22">5489<small> (tickets please!)</small></font>]]</font> 22:59, 17 February 2011 (UTC) '''Follow-up:''' I've put a sample blurb (~1,100 chars) straight into [[User:RexxS/MainPageFL-Content]]. It's not great; fresh eyes needed! <font face="Helvetica">[[User:Hassocks5489|<font color="#00BFFF"><b>Hassocks</b></font>]][[User talk:Hassocks5489|<font color="#228B22">5489<small> (tickets please!)</small></font>]]</font> 23:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:Yes, yes, yes, yes! Ditto. This is so necessary and such a good proposal. If anyone wants a workup on a sports list (since there aren't any in the samples list), I'll volunteer. — [[User:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#B71234">'''KV5'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#00338d">Talk</span>]] • 00:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::Having a couple of high-quality sports blurbs up our sleeves is the right way to go (possibly music as well). It certainly wouldn't be time wasted, as at some point in the future the lists would probably be in contention for the main page. But I don't think we should use them in the initial sample, unless we encounter opposition on the grounds that "while the examples are good, our endless sporting and music minutiae wouldn't reach anything like this standard". My view is that half of the battle will be convincing the uninitiated that while sport is well represented, FLC is far more diverse than that. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 02:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::I agree with that– and not to block all of my featured list contributions for the foreseeable future, but I think we should make sure not to put up video game lists at least for a good amount of time until the general format for lists is approved. They tend not to go down too well on the main page... [[User:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Nomader</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size: 6pt">([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Talk</span>]])</span></sup> 03:07, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::::I'd be somewhat inclined not to show the ones everyone knows you have, simply to surprise people with how varied and broad you actually are. Or, if you do include them, put them second-to-last. (I think people tend to scrutinise the last item on the list a bit more, like the teachers who only read the first and last page of an essay. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup> 03:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::::(just my 2 cents) As the main writer of one of the above mentioned lists, I would personally love to see it on the main page. Most FLs that I come across now a-days are worthy of a main page appearance and I would support a motion to add them in.--[[user:White Shadows|<font style="color:#191970">'''White Shadows'''</font>]] <sup>[[user talk:White Shadows|<font style="color:#DC143C">'''We live in a beautiful world'''</font>]]</sup> 22:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::::::Sorry, I wasn't very clear: I meant that the selected set of examples may as well leave out lists of types that FLs are accused of being nothing but. Obviously, I'm not saying well-written lists should be excluded from the main page. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup> 22:47, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*Where are we supposed to do blurbs if we are going to work them up for specific articles? — [[User:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#B71234">'''KV5'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#00338d">Talk</span>]] • 00:53, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
**At the moment it seems to be individual user's subpages. I guess there will eventually be a dedicated area, but I don't think one should be set up yet, for the same reasons as my previous comment. If we set up a new area as a free-for-all at this stage, and most of the submissions are popular culture, it would be used as a stick to beat this proposal with. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 01:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
***OK. I'd appreciate comments if anyone has them: [[User:Killervogel5/MainPageFLPrep]] is my working space right now. — [[User:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#B71234">'''KV5'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#00338d">Talk</span>]] • 02:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
**** I think your picture might be set to too small a size. It looks different when it's on a page next to a FP. [[User:RexxS/MainPageFL-Demo2]] - what do you think? --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 02:57, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*****The blurb and image themselves look great. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 03:12, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
******Thanks. I increased the picture to 175px. It's actually a surprisingly HQ image of a baseball award, which we are hard-pressed to find, so it didn't suffer from the increase. — [[User:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#B71234">'''KV5'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#00338d">Talk</span>]] • 13:09, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*****RexxS: Perhaps text wrapping would make the original image size seem somewhat more appropriate? —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 03:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
****** I agree it probably would, but currently the Main Page template uses two cells of a layout table to hold the image and the text separately for the Featured Picture block, so text wrapping can't happen. View the [[Main Page]] in a narrow browser window and you'll see what I mean. I've merely copied the same technique to display what is my best guess at the likely layout. We probably need to decide whether we would like to have text wrapping for our 45% of the block before Adam starts coding, but beware of the effect in a narrow browser window if we decide to wrap the text and the FP folk decide to leave their part unwrapped. I've knocked up what you suggest, so have a look at how [[User:RexxS/MainPageFL-Demo3]] behaves as you make your browser window narrower. I suspect that those using 1280px wide screens may not like the effect. --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 03:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*******Ahh, I'm with you now. Wasn't noticeable until you said because of the size of the current FP. Hopefully Adam will be able to shed some light. Potential technical necessity aside, I'd rather we weren't competing with FP on image size though. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 04:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
===Brief note=== |
|||
Compared with Featured sounds, video, and pictures, with all the interesting formatting, Lists are easy. I just make it so you can turn off the formatting for the other stuff, then sit back and let you type in whatever you want. ;) For example, the code for setting up a list might look something like: |
|||
{|border=1 |
|||
| |
|||
<nowiki>|type=List</nowiki><br /> |
|||
<nowiki>|description='''Featured list for Main Page''' is a list that... we have to describe in its entirety, including all formatting. </nowiki> |
|||
|} |
|||
I suspect that's all you really need, to be honest; I mean, the box around it is going to be the same for all featured content types, so I just need to give you control over what goes in the box. That said, if you want me to include, say, an easy way to add a picture, please let me know. |
|||
By the way, optional proposal, but I was thinking that for the first week or so after it goes on the main page, we might want to up the number of sounds and lists, to celebrate, say 4 lists alternating with 4 sounds, before returning to the normal schedule. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup> 18:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:Other than we would ''never'', '''''ever''''' start a list intro with "... is a list ...", of course!!! A picture would be important. Most, if not all FLs have at least a lead image. And the "celebration" week sounds good too... [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 18:22, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::Would the same format as FA pictures suit (only right aligned, perhaps)? [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup> 18:32, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yeah, it should work out fine. We'll probably have to see how it will look, but it should pretty much be the same format. My main question though is that for most featured articles, there is a bold title in the lead which the main page links to (i.e. '''Astronomy''' is the study...). Obviously, [[WP:FL]] rejects this idea of using "This is a '''list of all of the Maryland birds'''", as has been confirmed through multiple FLCs. So how do we get users from looking at the list to the article? Do we put a title above it somehow and then put the lead below? [[User:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Nomader</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size: 6pt">([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Talk</span>]])</span></sup> 18:36, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::::That's for you to decide. I'll provide coding support, if needed. See, the hard part of the coding is all the stuff that has to be done anyway for the FS/FP proposal, so it'd be very hard for you to make any feature requests that wouldn't be trivial to code in comparison. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup> 18:49, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I understand. All we really need is something similar to what FA already has for use on Wednesdays; we can figure out the title problem when we come to it with some sort of Wikicode workaround. Thanks for the help with the coding, Adam. [[User:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Nomader</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size: 6pt">([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Talk</span>]])</span></sup> 20:36, 16 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*Could do the linking like the FPs do, just pick a good set of words early on and link it. Most lists have some kind of decent phrase in the first couple sentences. [[User:Staxringold|Staxringold]] <sub>[[User talk:Staxringold|talk]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[Special:Contributions/Staxringold|contribs]]</span></sup> 13:20, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
: And there's always the fallback of "([[#|more ...]])" at the end of the piece as well. [[Bodley's Librarian]] blurb uses that in addition to a link in the first sentence. Folks will have to decide if they are happy with that stylistically, of course. --[[User:RexxS|RexxS]] ([[User talk:RexxS|talk]]) 22:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
===Where are we?=== |
|||
Hello everyone. Sorry I've been a bit out of the loop for the last day or so, but trying to catch up and ensure our approach is coherent and easy to follow by those outside the project. To that end, I've created a sandbox in my own user space ([[User:The Rambling Man/Main page FL candidates]]) where I think it would be best to add all possible candidates for blurbs that we can take to [[Talk:Main page]]. The six examples I gave above (along with WFC's) if possible should be transcluded/added to that sandbox, along, of course, with anyone else who wishes to put forward a candidate for us to show the rest of the community that we're not "just a bunch of stats". |
|||
Speaking with Adam Cuerden, it would seem most likely that we'll be looking to make the main proposal at the main page midway through next week, by which time I hope we'll have three directors in place, and at least half a dozen (more would be better!) examples of what we're capable of doing. So, if everyone can pull together and get these examples up and running by 22 February, then I think we stand a very, very good chance of a positive outcome! [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 13:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:I'd actually go with KV's over mine, purely on the grounds that if we're going to use a sports list, we should go for the one with the broadest appeal. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 13:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:I've even got carried away and done my own blurb there. Any comments gratefully received! [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 13:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::Is it okay for us mere mortals to edit there? If so, I'll get cracking on porting some of the <s>more</s> leads that lend themselves to blurbs more easily, and we can copy-edit them collectively. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 13:22, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yes yes, my sandbox is an open house, bring a blurb, hors-d'oeuvres provided... As for one sports over another, let's just blurb-up on the sandbox and decide from there on. I see no harm in being overqualified for main page...! [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 13:24, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
I would just like to encourage everyone to comment on the current write-ups at [[User:The Rambling Man/Main page FL candidates|TRM's FL candidate]] page. The more we critique and comment, the better type of proposal we can put forward to the community. And at TRM's [[User_talk:Nomader#Video_games_blurb_for_FL_mainpage_inclusion|slight encouragement]], I've put up a [[List of Donkey Kong video games|video game list]] as one of the candidates. I mean, what would a mainpage be like without video games? Great work on the blurbs so far, everyone. [[User:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Nomader</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size: 6pt">([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Talk</span>]])</span></sup> 15:31, 19 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
===Any more for any more... === |
|||
I'm in the mindset to invite a few more blurbs. Also, I'd like to encourage any comments on what else could go wrong when we nominate this proposal at [[Talk:Main page]]. On my [[User talk:The Rambling Man/Main page FL candidates|talk page for this]], WFCforLife has left a few ideas. Anything else would be great, and any comments in response to the stuff there too. |
|||
As for including a few more lists, I'd like to suggest these get added to our list of diversity at [[User:The Rambling Man/Main page FL candidates]]... |
|||
*[[List of Denver RTD light rail stations]] - [[User:Patriarca12]] |
|||
*[[List of longest streams of Oregon]] - [[User:Finetooth]] & [[User:Little Mountain 5]] |
|||
*[[List of Commando raids on the Atlantic wall]] - [[User:Jim Sweeney]] |
|||
*[[List of number-one singles from the 1980s (UK)]] - [[User:Rambo's Revenge]] |
|||
*[[Listed buildings in Rivington]] - [[User:J3Mrs]] |
|||
*[[Gordon Bennett Cup (ballooning)]] - [[User:The Rambling Man]] (seems egotistical, I know, but I think it really, really hits at the diversity thing...) |
|||
If we can add these to the ones already on the talkpage, and get decent blurbs in place, we have around four months of main page FLs already. If I'm going too far, let me know, but I think it's best to show our intent, and show we mean what we say. Let me know... [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 18:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
I also had some suggestions: |
|||
*[[List of Best in Show winners of the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show]] - [[User:Miyagawa]] |
|||
*[[List of Chinese inventions]] - [[User:Drewcifer3000]] |
|||
*<s>[[Shooting thaler]] - [[User:RHM22]]</s> |
|||
*[[List of men's major championships winning golfers]] - [[User:NapHit]] |
|||
*[[List of invasive species in the Everglades]] - [[User:Moni3]] |
|||
—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 20:05, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:Love pretty much all of the above examples. I think [[List of invasive species in the Everglades]] is of particular note, being a dynamic list. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 10:16, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::Any chance you could ping these nominators WFC? Once again I'm being stretched a little at work... If not, no worries and I'll try to get round to it later. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 10:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::Happy to draw up a blurb for the Westminster list. This is a great idea that I had no idea was progressing, and I'm very honoured that one of my articles has been highlighted so early in the process. [[User:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">Miyagawa</font>]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|<font face="Verdana">(talk)</font>]] 13:11, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::::Hello. I'm the author of [[Shooting thaler]], listed above, and I fully support this idea. Those who write FLs are tasked with as much work and scrutiny as any FA writer. Unfortunately, though, I would like to remove Shooting thaler from the list of possible main page candidates. I'm very proud of the list, but the images still need to receive the ok from the OTRS team. For this reason, I would hate to see the images in the list distract critics and fans alike from the wonderful idea of featuring an FL on the main page. Let me know if there's anything else I might be able to do to help get this project off the ground, though. Good luck!-[[User:RHM22|RHM22]] ([[User talk:RHM22|talk]]) 14:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I created an Userbox for those who support the proposal. Just add <nowiki>{{User:RHM22/FLbox}}</nowiki> to your userpage.-[[User:RHM22|RHM22]] ([[User talk:RHM22|talk]]) 14:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::Hello all. I am the author of the [[List of Denver RTD light rail stations]] and agree that this is a fantastic idea! FLs have to meet strict criteria and are more than appropriate on the main page. Plus, I personally think they are overdue for inclusion as visitors can more quickly digest a FL than a FA in getting a complete impression of the topic at hand. I am more than happy to give it a shot and draw up a blurb for the Denver RTD list. [[User:Patriarca12|Patriarca12]] ([[User talk:Patriarca12|talk]]) 16:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::I was the main author and co-nominator of [[List of longest streams of Oregon]], a collaborative effort involving several other editors. I'd be happy to prepare a blurb for potential main-page consideration by Raul654 and I'll do that later today. [[User:Finetooth|Finetooth]] ([[User talk:Finetooth|talk]]) 18:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
::::I don't like some of the changes being made to [[List of longest streams of Oregon]], nor do I understand them. Would it not be better to discuss them on the article's talk page? The revised layout does not look good, and at least one of the new titles is redundant. [[User:Finetooth|Finetooth]] ([[User talk:Finetooth|talk]]) 17:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
=== General discussion === |
|||
Not sure where to put this, but the proposal is popping all over my watchlist, so I'll put it here in a new section at the bottom. I don't support the inclusion of more marginal content on the mainpage (Featured sounds) and don't feel that the Featured Sounds process is up to snuff yet, while Featured pictures used to promote original research (don't know if that is still occurring), but since they are no worse than DYK, which routinely puts plagiarism on the main page, I haven't opposed that proposal. As long as they're stuck on the bottom of the mainpage, they're doing no more harm than DYK, which at least promotes the creation of new articles, albeit often plagiarized. WRT Featured Lists, they are generally higher quality than Sounds or Pictures, and the process has matured, but I suspect you all will have better luck with this proposal if you instead frame it as Featured Lists you will put forward to Raul654 (who has not been pinged in to this discussion, which I will do next) for his choice on the mainpage, similar to [[WP:TFA/R]], rather than proposing selection by another group of editors. I will oppose inclusion of Featured Lists if they circumvent entirely Raul's competent management of the mainpage. I do have a general concern that, in the environment of declining editorship, we're seeing more and more resources drained from Featured Articles, but that's not the fault of Lists. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 16:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*I may be mistaken, but I believe our grouping of lists isn't our picking what we want on the main page, but instead precisely what you're describing. We're just trying to pick out the best and brightest examples to be judged on via a TFA-style process. [[User:Staxringold|Staxringold]] <sub>[[User talk:Staxringold|talk]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[Special:Contributions/Staxringold|contribs]]</span></sup> 16:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
** Ah, in that case, I'm glad to hear it! If the proposal gains traction, I don't see any reason we couldn't adapt the already-existing page at [[WP:TFA/R]] for inclusion of Lists once a week. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 17:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
***And while my initial suggestion was that the FL directors would select lists for the first few weeks (i.e. the first four or so), we'd move to the TFA/R model eventually. What we ''don't'' want to do is over-complicate our initial chance at adding more featured and varied featured material to the main page by overcomplicating our newly-nurtured ideas. I seem to recall that even Raul654 selects several main page FAs as only five at a time are allowed at TFA/R? The directors would be doing nothing other than hand picking a few to start with, then once the concept has matured, we'll move onwards and upwards. I certainly didn't want to exclude Raul, although why he needs to be ''directly'' included, I'm not sure, I think the idea of the FL community helping to select their most accomplished works for the mainpage will work fine. And I really didn't even imagine the idea of draining resources from FA, that's certainly not on our agenda one iota. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 21:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
**** As I mentioned above, I haven't concerned myself with either Featured pictures or Featured sounds being on the mainpage, as they are occuyping space at the bottom of the page and are no worse than DYK. Whether you would want to be part of Raul's mainpage scheduling would then be related to whether you are proposing creating 1) yet another new section of the main page, 2) sharing space at the bottom with Picture and Sounds, or 3) asking for a semi-regular slot in the FA space. My suggestion is that, if you want a weekly slot with FA, then you would want to bring Raul into the discussion, and that would be joined with the [[WP:TFA/R]] process. I would oppose FLs taking space from FA unless Raul is scheduling it, since his oversight has been exceptional there, there has never been a mistake, and it's a smoothly functioning process. It's a question of design-- where you are proposing to get your space, or with whom you will be sharing it. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*****Ah, okay, well that's easy, we never proposed to take over an FA spot. Not for a moment. We always said we'd share the second FP space on Wednesdays only. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 22:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
****** PS, one only has to look at the list of FL directors, past and present, to know that FL has already drained resources from FA. I'm not complaining-- just saying; we can't oblige people to work outside of their area of interest. If you're proposing to share the FP space, no need to involve the TFA slot or Raul then, but have you made the Pictures and Sounds people aware ? I would support that proposal; FLs are high quality, so if Pictures and Sounds are getting mainpage space, so should FLs. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:37, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*******Yeah, I think there's a distinction between one area "draining resources" and another area losing resources for one reason or another. Until now, there's been little or no perceived benefit to being a FL community member, although we've fought hard for a year or so to be recognised as definitely part of Wikipedia's finest work, albeit slightly more niche than the FAs. The FS brigade (Adam Cuerden and Sven Manguard) are well aware of this proposal, but yes, I haven't informed the FP guys. I kind of figured that since they're getting potentially 12 FPs a week on the mainpage and we're asking for that to be 11 with 1 FL per week, it wasn't unreasonable, but I have overlooked that, so I'll remedy it as soon as possible. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 22:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
********Altering the mainpage involves a whole lotta design issues, so yes, you want to make sure everyone is on board early on. It's harder than it looks-- I watched all the tweaking when Raul ran all four on the anniversary, and was surprised at the amount of work involved! [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 22:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*********Already covered in the FL proposal, [[User:Adam Cuerden]] has agreed to incorporate the same re-coding issues for FLs as he's doing for FSs, so we've got that sorted too. I notified the FP folks, I didn't see any sign that the FS guys had done that though!! [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 22:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
**********In the FS proposal, it is said that the FS folks had the support of [[User:Howcheng]]. If I am not mistaken, he is the "director" of FP.—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 22:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
***********That may be correct. I went to [[WP:FPC]] to look for a "director" but found nothing obvious. So I left a note at [[WT:FP]] and [[WT:FPC]]. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 23:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
************FPC doesn't have a 'director' per se, but Howcheng runs POTD (the two processes are fairly independent). '''[[User:Jujutacular|<span style="color:#006400;">Jujutacular</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Jujutacular|talk]]</sup> 01:15, 22 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== New director? == |
|||
{{archivetop|result=[[User:Giants2008]] has community consensus to expand his role at FLC to director. Well done. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 15:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)}} |
|||
Hello FLC folks. As many of you are aware, [[User:Giants2008]] has done a sterling job in stepping in as an FLC delegate when both Dabomb87 and me are too busy to give FLC the attention it deserves. I'm here to propose that we ask Giants to take the role on formally, so that we have three directors. There are a couple of reasons for this, firstly it seems me and DB87 have less available time to dedicate to the process, and secondly (if we're really lucky) we may start to get lists featured on the main page. These things combined could use another pair of hands, and Giants is the ideal candidate. I've already [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThe_Rambling_Man&action=historysubmit&diff=414159780&oldid=414129344 asked him] if he'd be amenable to the idea, and he said he was, contingent on the community supporting this decision. So, community, please forthwith show your support (or otherwise) in favour of Giants2008 becoming a third Featured List director. Thanks. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 18:37, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
(post-note note: I'll close this down in 72 hours or so, there's no major drama here, I [and Giants] want to do this transparently... [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 21:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC)) |
|||
#"Per nominator"! [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 18:37, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support''' Giants is ideal. Methinks workload will increase too if the main page issue works out. '''[[User:Jujutacular|<span style="color:#006400;">Jujutacular</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Jujutacular|talk]]</sup> 18:40, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support''' I thought he was already a director, lol.--<span style="color:#A4D3EE; background-color:#E0EEEE;font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"> [[User:GreatOrangePumpkin|♫Greatorangepumpkin♫]] </span><span style="color:Black; background-color:#A4D3EE;font-family: 'Gigi'">[[User talk:GreatOrangePumpkin|T]]</span> 18:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support''' per the excellent reasons about to be given by the next person offering support. [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 18:46, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support''' best man for the job. If the current directors feel they need more hands for the work, they should of course be granted that. <font face="serif">[[User:Arsenikk|<font color="green"><strong>Arsenikk</strong></font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Arsenikk|<font color="grey">(talk)</font>]]</sup></font> 18:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
# '''Support''' ditto. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 19:24, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support''' no reason to oppose—<font face="Cambria" size="3">[[User:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">Chris!</font>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">c</font>]]/[[User talk:Chrishmt0423|<font color="black">t</font>]]</sub></font> 20:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support''' Fine with me. The only issue this could bring is he might be less prone to vote so he can ultimately close the FLCs. Heh. [[User:Staxringold|Staxringold]] <sub>[[User talk:Staxringold|talk]]</sub><sup><span style="position: relative; left: -16px; margin-right: -16px;">[[Special:Contributions/Staxringold|contribs]]</span></sup> 21:20, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#:I agree that on the face of it, that could be an issue, but I've closed a few FLCs that I've voted in, without too many complaints (!) so hopefully the same grace would be applied to Giants. As long as there's no clear COI, no problem in my opinion. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 21:22, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#:Directorship wouldn't have to mean a reduction in his level of commenting (short of a vote), and any decrease in his voting will I hope be matched by increased voting by TRM and Dabomb (if they wish) since there will now be two people available to close the discussion not one. [[User:Bencherlite|Bencherlite]][[User talk:Bencherlite|<i><sup>Talk</sup></i>]] 22:31, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#::Yep. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 22:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support''' Great editor, no reason to oppose. Looks like there's strong consensus in favor. [[User:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Nomader</span>]] <sup><span style="font-size: 6pt">([[User talk:Nomader|<span style="color:#007FFF">Talk</span>]])</span></sup> 21:31, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#In my eyes, Giants has been as good as director for the past couple of years anyway. [[User:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]] ([[User talk:Dabomb87|talk]]) 22:39, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Strongest possible support''' — [[User:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#B71234">'''KV5'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#00338d">Talk</span>]] • 00:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support'''. I'm usually a fan of detailed rationales, but in this case the reasons are [[Special:Contributions/Giants2008|plain for all to see]]. —[[User:WFCforLife|W]][[User talk:WFCforLife|F]][[Special:Contributions/WFCforLife|C]]— 01:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support''' - He's more than well equipped for the job and I'd imagine there wouldn't be as much of a backlog as there is now. <font color="FF1493">[[User:Afkatk|Afro]]</font> ([[User talk:Afkatk|<font color="F88379">'''''Talk'''''</font>]]) 08:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support'''Sounds great. [[User:Adabow|Adabow]] ([[User talk:Adabow|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Adabow|contribs]]) 10:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support''' – Guys don't think I'm mad or something, but last night, I was thinking how busy you guys (Rambling Man and Dabomb87) are these days. There are plenty of FLC and FLRC to do. Giants2008 is a very reliable person, and I support him becoming a delegate. – <font face="Arial" color="CornflowerBlue">[[User:Novice7|'''Novice7''']]</font> (<font face="Arial" color="DodgerBlue">[[User talk:Novice7|'''talk''']]</font>) 10:59, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support''', the candidate seems like a more than appropriate/accomplished editor. There is plenty of work to go around and surely it will speed up the processes? — [[User:Lil-unique1|<font color="DarkRed">'''Lil_<font color="red">℧</font>niquℇ <font color="red">№</font>1</font>]] [[User talk: Lil-unique1|'''<font color="Black"><sup>[talk]</sup></font>''']] 14:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
#'''Support'''—fully confident he'd do an excellent job. <i>[[User:Grondemar|–]][[User talk:Grondemar|Grondemar]]</i> 07:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
{{archive bottom}} |
|||
Congrats, Giants! --<font color="navy">[[User:Another Believer|Another Believer]]</font> <sub>(<font color="cc6600">[[User talk:Another Believer|Talk]]</font>)</sub> 17:42, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Post-discussion support'''. I really need to keep a closer eye on FLC. -- [[User:Scorpion0422|<font color="#FF8C00">Scorpion</font>]]<sup>[[user talk:Scorpion0422|<font color="black">0422</font>]]</sup> 18:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== FL on main-page proposal now up for discussion at [[Talk:Main page]] == |
|||
{{archivetop}} |
|||
Just to let the project know there will hopefully be active discussion [[Talk:Main Page#Featured list proposal|here]] about lists on the main-page. [[User:The Rambling Man|The Rambling Man]] ([[User talk:The Rambling Man|talk]]) 17:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:And getting screwed over by the FA people. Not in the least bit surprising, I must say. [[User:StrPby|Str]][[User:Strange Passerby|Pby]] ([[User talk:Strange Passerby|talk]]) 23:25, 23 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:: Perhaps someone with a short memory and a lack of gratitude can inform you about which two editors worked the hardest to get a directorship established for FLC years ago, and which one editor put the first FL on the mainpage. But don't let the facts get in the way of ignorant, unfactual statements. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:49, 24 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::Yeah, that's not accurate at all. — [[User:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#B71234">'''KV5'''</span>]] • [[User_talk:Killervogel5|<span style="color:#00338d">Talk</span>]] • 02:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Here's the old Dispatch: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-05-12/Dispatches]]. Maybe some folks can be arsed to read the links, refresh their memory, get a sense of perspective, and stop biting the hands that fed you. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:I don't want to get into a fight here but just how as I not right? As of this comment there are three opposes: you, Raul and some guy who strongly opposed us getting on the main page unless we do it through TFA. It seems pretty clear, at least to me, that it's only the FA side which has an issue with this. That's the last I'm saying on this because I'm not here to make enemies, I just want to see FLs recognised. [[User:StrPby|Str]][[User:Strange Passerby|Pby]] ([[User talk:Strange Passerby|talk]]) 03:04, 24 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:: Your reading comprehension appears to be impaired: I suggest you come back after you've done some reading. No one in the FA process has opposed based on "getting on the main page unless we do it through TFA", and you certainly don't appear to have taken the time to read the links in the Dispatch above or the discussion at [[WT:MAIN]] or at [[User talk:Raul654]], since you continue to believe the FA people don't want FLs recognized. Before you denigrate other editors, try reading. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:09, 24 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::You have not EXACTLY said that, but have had a bunch of comments in that vein and a bunch of mistaken expectations that things should run through Raul, through your slot, use your processes, etc. Made comments on how much content they should put up (for a pilot, which they had talked through already). Come on. Keep your eye on the real enemy, DYK. Let these guys try something out. [[User:TCO|TCO]] ([[User talk:TCO|talk]]) 03:13, 24 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
:::: Um, well, that is also incorrect, but don't let me get in the way. When I thought the proposal was for shared space with FA, I suggested that Raul be brought in early on. Once I realized that wasn't the proposal, I retracted.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Featured_list_candidates&oldid=415628144#General_discussion] Do read before furthering false notions that are feeding some inferiority complex here, or the idea that "FA people" are against FLs on the mainpage. To my knowledge, we have not seen a single post to that effect from anyone involved in FAC. [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 03:19, 24 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
{{archivebottom}} |
|||
Revision as of 08:24, 24 February 2011
 | Please note that this talk page is for discussion related to Wikipedia:Featured list candidates. Off-topic discussions, including asking for peer reviews or asking someone to promote an FLC you are involved in, are not appropriate and may be removed without warning. Thank you for your cooperation. |
|
The closure log
Comments from Giants2008 (talk · contribs), PresN (talk · contribs), and Hey man im josh (talk · contribs), and other notes of pertinence. Should you wish to contact the delegates, you can use the {{@FLC}} ping facility.
|
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
