Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article review/Roman–Persian Wars/archive2: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 17: Line 17:
*'''Delist''' per above. Also, regardless of the sourcing quality the references section also needs cleanup. ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] &#183; [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) '''[[User:buidhe|<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>]]''' 17:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delist''' per above. Also, regardless of the sourcing quality the references section also needs cleanup. ([[User talk:Buidhe|t]] &#183; [[Special:Contributions/Buidhe|c]]) '''[[User:buidhe|<span style="color: black">buidhe</span>]]''' 17:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delist''' no significant progress to improve article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 02:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delist''' no significant progress to improve article. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 02:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

{{FARClosed|delisted}} [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 04:17, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:17, 18 September 2021

Roman–Persian Wars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Notified: Yannismarou as the FAC/GA nominator and ZxxZxxZ and burh as frequent editors, the projects listed on the talk page

Review section

I am nominating this featured article for review because some of the issues raised in March on the talk page - including uncited text and a rather heavy reliance on old/primary sources which may not comply with WP:WIAFA 1c - still exist. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The heavy reliance on primary sources and somewhat outdated secondary sources is a major issue. It is a broad topic, so maybe improvement should begin from child articles (e.g. Roman–Parthian War of 58–63, Parthian war of Caracalla, etc. also in poor condition) --Z 07:15, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Trappist_the_monk/HarvErrors shows a lot of the secondary sources are not linked to - so if they are still useful they should perhaps be moved to "further reading" Chidgk1 (talk) 15:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section largely concern sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]