User talk:Mr.User200

Possible SP account

Mr.User200: Possible Anti Turkish Sockpuppet account. He keeps adding wrong information, ignores simple facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.54.97.15 (talk) 22:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Comment

How do this works?User200.48.214.19 (talk) 22:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "User200.48.214.19", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it resembles an IP address. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 13:06, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks never knew it was not apropiate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Changing_username/Simple
User200.48.214.19 (talk) 13:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

New sock?

[[1]] Gala19000? Shadow4dark (talk) 19:55, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Most possibly. Should keep an eye on the pages those SP vandalized.Mr.User200 (talk) 01:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Mr.User200, may I report the sockpuppet investigation? {{31}}{{25A (talk)}} 15:03, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Go ahead.Mr.User200 (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Mr.User200, thx but give me some diffs; the ANI report isn't enough. {{31}}{{25A (talk)}} 15:21, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Hope format help to understand: A) Previous Socks, B) This user.

1) 2019–20 Western Libya campaign
A) SockPuppet User:Gal17928 a secundary SP of User:Gala19000. Edited and commented that Turkish Drones used in Lybia were GNA operated despite some sources they were Turkish operated. First , Second, Thrid

B) Same behaviour. Here on Turkish drones.

2) Turkish drones: Bayraktar Tactical UAS & A) Use of Claim in edit Summaries by User:Gal17928 a secundary SP of User:Gala19000.Claims, Errasing Info.

B) Same behaviour in editor. Here

3) Same languague use:[[ ]] A) B)

4) Reverting/errasing Russian role in 2020 Balyun airstrikes A) SockPuppet Maskalaeuba Here B) This user, same behaviour same edit summary. Here

5) List of wars involving Turkey & Talk:List of wars involving Turkey A) Banned SP: User:Maskalaeuba errased content (POV) regarding the Operation Spring Shiled Result Here
Commented and unsuccesfully teamed with User:Beshogur to revert my edits Here. On Adminboard, I was blocked for 1 week for 3RR; reverting a Sock (Maskalaeuba). The Report was made by Beshogur and both were editing the same.

B) This new user tries to team up with User:Beshogur again Here

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northwestern_Syria_offensive_(December_2019%E2%80%93March_2020)&diff=963381802&oldid=963154678

6) Edit Behaviour:
A) Pages edited by this banned Sockpuppets:
Operation Spring Shield - By User:Maskalaeuba and User:Nabu-Kudurri-Usur Yaniv
List of wars involving Turkey by User:Maskalaeuba and User.Gal17928
2020 Balyun airstrikes - By User:Nabu-Kudurri-Usur Yaniv, User:Maskalaeuba and User:AlAboud83
Pantsir missile system User:李王陈柳 - User:Maskalaeuba, User:Ahhlanker and User:Nabu-Kudurri-Usur Yaniv and Anon IP Northwestern Syria offensive (December 2019–March 2020) - By User:Nabu-Kudurri-Usur Yaniv,

B) By this new user, and how many times:
Operation Spring Shield (58)
List of wars involving Turkey (7)
2020 Balyun airstrikes (4)
Bayraktar TB2 (5)
Pantsir missile system (4)
Northwestern Syria offensive (December 2019–March 2020) (3)

7)In the end this user is Maskaleuba.
Final evidence here: Maskalaeuba Edits Maistara edits

Same articles same times.

176.88.136.86 user tries to undermine us on Administrators' noticeboard

176.88.136.86 user tries to undermine us on Administrators' noticeboard, i already replied, you would probably want to leave a comment too. F.Alexsandr (talk) 07:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

References

Watching

I received your message. I have not run across edits by that user in my watchlist in over a week now, but I'll keep be looking. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello, I'm OKMG-1200. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ma'rib Campaign—because it did not appear constructive. Tariq Salam is the cermonially-appointed Houthi governor of Aden. Not the the current defacto govrenor of Aden, Ahmed Lamlas. By the way, when I reverted your edit, I made a comment about STC and UAE in Edit Summary, please Ignore it. the comment is just a mistake. OKMG-1200 (talk) 12:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop using edit summary as a forum. Your personal idea that the STC is Isis linked is pure Original Research. I have reverted your edits because of this. Just keep the article as it's current version. The media used to back the Al Qaeda presence in Marib in behalve of Hadi forces is one hundred percent anti Houthi, not a Partisan source.Mr.User200 (talk) 15:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

First, the current governer of Aden is Lamlas not Tariq Salam. Tariq Salam is appointed by the Houthis, check this. it says that Tariq Salam is appointed by Supreme Political Council. Second, I told you that I made a mistake in the edit summary. I thought you were talking about governor Lamlas. OKMG-1200 (talk) 15:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

But why STC, if is Pro-Hadi back those Houthi leaned claims??.Mr.User200 (talk) 15:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

What do you mean? could you explain more??? OKMG-1200 (talk) 15:42, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

STC media page is the main source of that entry on the article.Mr.User200 (talk) 15:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

do you mean the source I just gave you? or your source that you used? — Preceding unsigned comment added by OKMG-1200 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

I think both pages need be mergedShadow4dark (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Still not all events are in the Marib article, I´am placing them there. 7 Feb and 16 Feb events Mr.User200 (talk) 16:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

I hope I cleared this misunderstanding about who is the defacto governor of Aden. Thus, the information about the presence of AQAP and ISIS is just claimed by pro-Houthi media. OKMG-1200 (talk) 16:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, he is Houhti aligned but that does not undermine tha fact that some anti-Houthi media still report that event. I will made the corretions. But dont errase information in the way you have been doing. Mr.User200 (talk) 16:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

You should be careful while you search for sources. there is huge information warfare in the media between pro-Hadi and pro-Houthi factions. and talking about erasing information, you have erased the information I added. OKMG-1200 (talk) 16:38, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

You changed a whole paragraph with another type of information like you did here in 22 February, and already warned you for that. And is not the first time you errase information. Regarding the Al-Jawf revert, not all events were already at the Marib article, so what you said here is not true. The events reported in 7 and 16 February were not present. (Your revert at 13:10, 24 February 2021, Marib article 13:10, 24 February 2021 It´s you that should be more cautious errasing information and saying its elsewere.Mr.User200 (talk) 16:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

you should remove the vandalism warning. I tried to fix your misunderstanding. yes, I could have done it better than that and yes I made a mistake. but you also made a mistake. OKMG-1200 (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Is not a vandalism warning, the icon used is this instead of or , those are vandalism or block icons.Mr.User200 (talk) 17:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

i mean this . it is used for a template vandalism revert warnings. OKMG-1200 (talk) 17:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, thats the apropiate for page blanking.Mr.User200 (talk) 17:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Likely Sock puppet account

Anti Turkish Sock puppet account. He keeps adding misinformation. Likely Russian troll.