Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Cyberbot I (talk | contribs) Bot clerking, archiving 3 threads, 1 pending request remains. |
Jaredscribe (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent Disruptive Editing. I think there's been 3 RD1 requests in just as many days. This is nonsensical at this point. Also just general disruptive editing. [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 03:20, 7 August 2022 (UTC) |
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent Disruptive Editing. I think there's been 3 RD1 requests in just as many days. This is nonsensical at this point. Also just general disruptive editing. [[User:Curbon7|Curbon7]] ([[User talk:Curbon7|talk]]) 03:20, 7 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
*Two of these requests, if I'm counting correctly, were about content added by {{u|Jaredscribe}} (extended-confirmed), and one of them was now declined by me. What remains is one single quickly-reverted and now deleted copyright violation revision that would have been prevented by semi-protection. Protection may still be helpful, but rather not because of the RD1 requests. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 04:07, 7 August 2022 (UTC) |
*Two of these requests, if I'm counting correctly, were about content added by {{u|Jaredscribe}} (extended-confirmed), and one of them was now declined by me. What remains is one single quickly-reverted and now deleted copyright violation revision that would have been prevented by semi-protection. Protection may still be helpful, but rather not because of the RD1 requests. [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 04:07, 7 August 2022 (UTC) |
||
*:Curbon7's proposal for deletion of the article as a "non-event" was itself disruptive, and basically in ignorance of the historical facts. since then, |
|||
*: have attempted to include public domain statements by Xinhua and by the US SoS about this "event". These have been reverted, and revdel'd under tendentious (mis)interpretations of copyright policy. And they should be restored ASAP. thanks [[User:Jaredscribe|Jaredscribe]] ([[User talk:Jaredscribe|talk]]) 10:41, 7 August 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:41, 7 August 2022
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
2022 Chinese military exercises around Taiwan
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. I think there's been 3 RD1 requests in just as many days. This is nonsensical at this point. Also just general disruptive editing. Curbon7 (talk) 03:20, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- Two of these requests, if I'm counting correctly, were about content added by Jaredscribe (extended-confirmed), and one of them was now declined by me. What remains is one single quickly-reverted and now deleted copyright violation revision that would have been prevented by semi-protection. Protection may still be helpful, but rather not because of the RD1 requests. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:07, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- Curbon7's proposal for deletion of the article as a "non-event" was itself disruptive, and basically in ignorance of the historical facts. since then,
- have attempted to include public domain statements by Xinhua and by the US SoS about this "event". These have been reverted, and revdel'd under tendentious (mis)interpretations of copyright policy. And they should be restored ASAP. thanks Jaredscribe (talk) 10:41, 7 August 2022 (UTC)