Jump to content

User talk:69.127.80.35: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
fix
decline unblock
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock|reason=''Dear Wikipedia and its users, I am here with this message to explain why I should be unblocked. I think that it was wrong block me because the majority of my recent edit history has been contributing to the Wikipedia community[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Puppy_Dog_Pals_episodes&action=history][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Puppy_Dog_Pals_episodes&action=history&offset=20221124182834%7C1123616348] (for the latter two links, if you want a closer look at what I edited, you know where to click), and I think that it’s not just that just because one of my edits didn’t sit well with a single Wikipedia user, I should be blocked for an extremely long period of time. I have apparently been blocked from editing due to "disruptive editing”. However, as aforementioned, the majority of my recent edit history has been contributing to Wikipedia. If I ever disruptive edit, then fellow users can let me know if I am in the wrong rather than jump to conclusions. I do not genuinely want to hurt Wikipedia. I now realize that the users who reported me and blocked me don’t want to anger me, they simply want to protect Wikipedia from any potential threats. I genuinely want to help improve Wikipedia, not harm it, so if anyone has the time and patience to read this, I just want them to know that I want to contribute to Wikipedia, not harm it.''}}
{{unblock reviewed|reason=''Dear Wikipedia and its users, I am here with this message to explain why I should be unblocked. I think that it was wrong block me because the majority of my recent edit history has been contributing to the Wikipedia community[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Puppy_Dog_Pals_episodes&action=history][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Puppy_Dog_Pals_episodes&action=history&offset=20221124182834%7C1123616348] (for the latter two links, if you want a closer look at what I edited, you know where to click), and I think that it’s not just that just because one of my edits didn’t sit well with a single Wikipedia user, I should be blocked for an extremely long period of time. I have apparently been blocked from editing due to "disruptive editing”. However, as aforementioned, the majority of my recent edit history has been contributing to Wikipedia. If I ever disruptive edit, then fellow users can let me know if I am in the wrong rather than jump to conclusions. I do not genuinely want to hurt Wikipedia. I now realize that the users who reported me and blocked me don’t want to anger me, they simply want to protect Wikipedia from any potential threats. I genuinely want to help improve Wikipedia, not harm it, so if anyone has the time and patience to read this, I just want them to know that I want to contribute to Wikipedia, not harm it.''|decline=I don't your productive edits make up for your disruption and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:69.127.80.35&oldid=1124513106 personal attacks with threats of violence]. Furthermore, shorter blocks have failed to stop the disruption from this IP address(which may not have just been from you) so it seems necessary to keep this IP blocked. I am declining your request. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC) }}
:If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. --> {{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}} -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 04:26, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
:If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. --> {{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}} -- [[User:Rockstone35|<span style="color:#DF0101"><b>Rockstone</b></span>]][[User talk:Rockstone35|<span style="color:0000ff;font-size:15px"><sup><small><b>Send me a message!</b></small></sup></span>]] 04:26, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:25, 7 December 2022

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.127.80.35 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia and its users, I am here with this message to explain why I should be unblocked. I think that it was wrong block me because the majority of my recent edit history has been contributing to the Wikipedia community[1][2] (for the latter two links, if you want a closer look at what I edited, you know where to click), and I think that it’s not just that just because one of my edits didn’t sit well with a single Wikipedia user, I should be blocked for an extremely long period of time. I have apparently been blocked from editing due to "disruptive editing”. However, as aforementioned, the majority of my recent edit history has been contributing to Wikipedia. If I ever disruptive edit, then fellow users can let me know if I am in the wrong rather than jump to conclusions. I do not genuinely want to hurt Wikipedia. I now realize that the users who reported me and blocked me don’t want to anger me, they simply want to protect Wikipedia from any potential threats. I genuinely want to help improve Wikipedia, not harm it, so if anyone has the time and patience to read this, I just want them to know that I want to contribute to Wikipedia, not harm it.

Decline reason:

I don't your productive edits make up for your disruption and personal attacks with threats of violence. Furthermore, shorter blocks have failed to stop the disruption from this IP address(which may not have just been from you) so it seems necessary to keep this IP blocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} -- RockstoneSend me a message! 04:26, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]