User talk:Fulcrum0

December 2022

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Cyprus–Turkey maritime zones dispute. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Also refrain from non-constructive edits as you did to Aegean Sea, which have been automatically reverted and resulted to an increase of the article's protection level. Wikipedia works by consensus and the information has to reflect on reliable sources, not on editorial views. --- ❖ SilentResident ❖ ^{(talk ✉ | contribs ✎)} 12:04, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, first of all I am glad to hear that we are on the same page. Wikipedia should be stating facts in a neutral manner and avoid the use of any subjective adjectives. If you go ahead and check both pages, you will see that the "Blue Homeland Doctorine" is claimed to be "irredentist" and "expansionist". This is a heavily biased statement favoring the Greek views and subjective conclusions. The sources provided for the following terms don't imply that the doctorine is "irredentist" and "expansionist", they don't even mention these words. They rather give general information regarding the Turkish perspective and legal claims. Therefore, using the mentioned adjectives is totaly the Greek personal analysis since there is no legal binding. So, to be able to use these adjectives you should mention that it is how the Greek state and media views the aforementioned doctorine.

Furthermore, if you check the sources of the Aegean dispute, you will observe that the Greek state and media sources are mentioned dominantly. If you are honest regarding your thoughts on the neutrality of the page, you should really reconsider the issue and check the sources properly. The general tone of the page is highly favoring the Greek views and forms a perception as if the Greek claims are de jure. For example, the article never mentions the so called "Seville Map" which represents the Greek claims in the region and the fact that the United States clearly mentions that these claims have no binding [1]. Fulcrum0 (talk) 15:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

@Fulcrum0: Sorry but it is just your editorial POV versus reliable sources and Wikipedia reflects only on reliable sources, not on what editors may think or believe. Editorial views not supported by any third party reliable sources, constitute original research and have no place in Wikipedia. The project reflects on RS and you may ask for information to be adjusted or removed only by challenging it, which is done by providing strong and indisputable reliable sources which contradict the cited RS. Anything other than that, is simply a case of "I don't like it" and I strongly recommend that you avoid going down this path of edit-warring to change the content in the articles to suit your one-sided Turkish POV at the expense of any consensus which reflects the majority's views as expressed by the international community. This kind of behavior is regarded as disruptive and may result in your editing privileges being removed or your account being blocked by the admins. Please familiarize yourself with WP:FIVEPILLARS to understand how things work here. Once you are familiarized with the guidelines, feel free to open a proper talk page discussion regarding any issues you may think that there are about these or other articles, and provide WP:RS to support your claims. Only then we may take you seriously. Thank you. --- ❖ SilentResident ❖ ^{(talk ✉ | contribs ✎)} 18:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Im sorry mate but you are distorting the truth. The sources that you mention to use those adjectives DO NOT contain any of those words, thus they are your own comments. As I mentioned, if you insist on adding them you should mention that it is how the Greek state and media views this policy. As you are threatening me with a ban for protecting the neutral view policy I think we should contact and admin to solve the issue because you don’t reply my points but keep repeating your opinion. * {{vandal|SilentResident}} The user doesn’t answer the points I make to protect the neutral view policy and threatens a new user with a ban. ~~~~ Fulcrum0 (talk) 18:57, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Cyprus–Turkey maritime zones dispute, you may be blocked from editing. --- ❖ SilentResident ❖ ^{(talk ✉ | contribs ✎)} 18:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Mate, it is so funny that you are not answering my points and instead blaming me for the rules that you are not respecting. I will report you for distorting the truth and threatening a new user that acts to protect the neutral point of view policy of Wikipedia WP:RS. Fulcrum0 (talk) 18:45, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - ❖ SilentResident ❖ ^{(talk ✉ | contribs ✎)} 19:12, 31 December 2022 (UTC)