User talk:Da.Tomato.Dude: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:13, 28 March 2007

Haha i dont know you

Actually i dont know you very well i've just seen your edits everywhere and i clicked your name out of curiousity, oh yeah and thanks for the sig! Very "spiffy"! User:Atomic Religione

Shhhh!....

...people will find out my (our) secret for staying on top of the vandals! ;o) RΞDVΞRS ✖ ЯΞVΞЯSΞ 22:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Autograph book

Hey! Would you like to sign my autograph book? here is the link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Atomic_Religione/Autograph_book --ÄtΘmic R€£igione;

I signed your's so please sign mine. User:Mikemoral/Autograph Book Mikemoral 23:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

License tagging for Image:Smily Tomato.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Smily Tomato.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Great RV Work!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Amazing RV work, DTD! Keep it up! Cinnaspice

re: b'day greet...

Hey thanks! those Chocolates are making me really hungry! --h y dka t 18:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE :)

That's OK, I was happy to sign your sig book. Do you like my sig? Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 19:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of nomination for deletion

Hello. I'm notifying you of a request for deletion I have filed for many of your user subpages, here. You may wish to comment. --Deskana (talk) 22:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pengwiin sig

thanks for the sig! i like the "pengwiin" colors! :-) Pengwiin / talk

You need to show you care

re: this Mfd... you need to make an appearance here and show you care. // FrankB 14:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:re:

Thank you for the reminder...the reason I didn't show up was because I don't get up and edit Wikipedia at 8 in the morning...but, again, thanks. I made a comment...I'm not sure if I can put a Keep/Delete thing on or not, though. Protect Tomato Rights!_{(sign the petition!)}

You're quite welcome, and the Mfd has been around a while now... at least the nom was courteous enough to notify you! Submit, adding {{db-author}} to a couple of those pages with no content, might be a good move too. Make sure to rub it in by making a note on the group page nomination. <g> Good luck there all the way! I've never heard of deleting a persons personal pages... May even be against policy... Asking at WP:AN/I would be a good move too... attract more mature and established admins who would be insensed, I'd bet.

This talk page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a corrupt or empty file, or a file description page for a file on Commons. Try previewing a resized thumbnail before deleting. See CSD F2.

If this talk page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can check back later to see if you have received a response to your message.

Note that this talk page may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation added below this notice is found to be insufficient.

Nominator: Please consider placing the template:

{{subst:Db-noimage-notice|User talk:Da.Tomato.Dude|header=1}} ~~~~

on the talk page of the author.

Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google.
This page was last edited by Walton One (contribs | logs) at 18:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC) (17 years ago)[reply]

Also, since you are obviously into splashy colors, you should probably bookmark http://colorfilter.wickline.org/ and do some testing. Quite a few of us are color blind, or color deficient, and having a tool in the toolbox never hurts, and keeping that design need in mind is a courtesy if you keep doing such pages. Best of luck! // FrankB 16:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MfD

Hi, I just want to say that I fully support you in this case. The editor who nominated your user subpages for deletion was being unreasonable, particularly as some of your pages are useful warning templates. It was also out of order for them to delete your "Body Shop" without bothering to notify you or take it through MfD. What I would recommend is that you use a {{db-userreq}} tag on the empty pages; since your other pages mostly have a useful function, there's no reason why they should be deleted. Anyway, don't be discouraged by the way some users have treated you - we're not all like that. :) Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 15:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreasonable isn't an apt description when so many people agree with me. --Deskana (talk) 16:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your post on my talk page

I have nothing against you. I have however noted that a minimal proportion of your edits are to articles, with the vast majority of the rest being to user and usertalk space. This is an undeniable fact; of course, what it means is up to interpretation. I've got no contest with the ones you've had deleted (naturally), but I think the rest should be deleted. My original nomination stands. Should they be deleted you're welcome to use the templates that I and other people find perfectly adequate, detailed at Template:TestTemplates. Fancy fonts and extreme signatures should be avoided. What's wrong with {{welcome}}? You can note I do have my own welcome template, User:Deskana/welcome, but it doesn't contain any of the fancy fonts which yours contain. --Deskana (talk) 16:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to the wrong thing, sorry. I was talking about User:Da.Tomato.Dude/DTD_RV and User:Da.Tomato.Dude/DTD_RV2. There's nothing wrong with editing usertalk pages for warnings but I'd point out that's not what you're doing. For example, of your last few edits (as of writing this)

Perhaps this cross-section of your most recent edits highlights the problem I have? Very few are related to furthering the encyclopedia. I'd rather have not done that, but I am trying to prove my point. --Deskana (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that was just your most recent edits- the speedy deletion stuff isn't unencyclopedic and was clearly done in good faith (regardless of whether it may or may not be wrong). I was just trying to make a point about the distribution of your edits. And you didn't sound hostile, don't worry. We're all above that here, yourself included. --Deskana (talk) 18:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To Deskana - Er, so how are two nominations for speedy deletion not "related to furthering the encyclopedia"? And as to the vote-related edits, if you nominate DTD's userpages for deletion, you can hardly expect her not to fight it. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 18:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To DTD - Don't be discouraged. The rest of us value your contributions. :) Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 18:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sig

No problem! --tennis man ^{sign here!} 17:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, here, you can see it again! --tennis man ^{sign here!} 17:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 83: / Line 83: @@
 Perhaps this cross-section of your most recent edits highlights the problem I have? Very few are related to furthering the encyclopedia. I'd rather have not done that, but I am trying to prove my point. --[[User:Deskana|Deskana]] [[User talk:Deskana|<small>(talk)</small>]] 17:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 :Actually, that was just your most recent edits- the speedy deletion stuff isn't unencyclopedic and was clearly done in good faith (regardless of whether it may or may not be wrong). I was just trying to make a point about the distribution of your edits. And you didn't sound hostile, don't worry. We're all above that here, yourself included. --[[User:Deskana|Deskana]] [[User talk:Deskana|<small>(talk)</small>]] 18:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
+:To Deskana - Er, so how are two nominations for speedy deletion not "related to furthering the encyclopedia"? And as to the vote-related edits, if you nominate DTD's userpages for deletion, you can hardly expect her not to fight it. <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 18:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
+:To DTD - Don't be discouraged. The rest of us value your contributions. :) <font face="Verdana">[[User:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="Purple">'''Wal'''</font>]][[User talk:Walton_monarchist89|<font color="silver">'''ton'''</font>]] <small><sup><font color="Purple">[[WP:BRoy|Vivat Regina!]]</font></sup></small></font> 18:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 == Sig ==