User talk:Daniel: Difference between revisions
Tag: Reverted |
→Help please - Deletion review - Articles_for_deletion/Down-ball: remove, have just seen a convo |
||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
Hello Daniel, it looks like you're experienced in Deletion review. I'm a relative Wikipedia newcomer and I'd like to request your assistance in helping me follow the process. No problem if you're already busy. [[User:Rockycape|Rockycape]] ([[User talk:Rockycape|talk]]) 02:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC) |
Hello Daniel, it looks like you're experienced in Deletion review. I'm a relative Wikipedia newcomer and I'd like to request your assistance in helping me follow the process. No problem if you're already busy. [[User:Rockycape|Rockycape]] ([[User talk:Rockycape|talk]]) 02:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
:Hi [[User:Rockycape|Rockycape]], the best advice I can give you is to go to the talk page of the administrator who closed the discussion (Drmies, who is linked at the top of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Down-ball]]), and initiate a conversation with them regarding the outcome and possible next steps. From there, if you aren't satisfied with their response, the only place on Wikipedia that can review closures of deletion discussions is Deletion Review, as you mentioned - the instructions are reasonably simple, if you get to that stage. Cheers, [[User:Daniel|Daniel]] ([[User talk:Daniel#top|talk]]) 03:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:56, 5 July 2024
Hello Daniel, In the Afd you stated, "the sources presented by the individual editor refuting deletion do not qualify for the GNG threshold. " May I draw your attention on the fact that there are at least two contributors who voted Keep (the second being myself). Also, I concur that bludgeoning in the page was not making it easy to read, but can you confirm that you're not referring to bludgeoning by (the same) one editor only? Regarding this issue, there are times at Afds when sources and K !votes are challenged, so that !voters are forced to insist (and the page is deleted because they haven't....) I understand there's a difference between replying and bludgeoning but when your !votes are challenged constantly and relentlessly, you can either only give up or insist, which may eventually looks like bludgeoning, I'm afraid. @Owenx, who closed as Delete. Anyway, just mentioning this issue for the record. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Removed TemplateThank you for your monitoring of my talk page and removal of a stupid template. I think that this had been a case of responding to a template with a template. I had given User:Ratnahastin a [[WP:CTOPIC}contentious topic]] alert about Sri Lanka. As you said, I was assuming good faith, but I wasn't observing collaborative behavior. As we know, Sri Lanka is a contentious topic, and this AFD was contentious, and this DRV is contentious. What this exchange illustrates is the high level of stubbornness and anger. I will comment in passing that I think that an excessive level of anger is much of what is wrong with American politics, but that is beside the point. Anyway, I think it was a revenge templating, and that it illustrates that collaborative editing has failed. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't reply to your question since the discussion is closed. But for your clarification, neither was I the one who said 'please help me save the article by voting', nor was it related to Baalveer 4. M S Hassan (talk) 04:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2024News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
Incoming...Hello, Daniel. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the Australian railroad IP (220.235.232.212)Hi Daniel, I detected them editing an article on my watchlist at Special:Diff/1232485196. Regards, TarnishedPathtalk 03:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
|
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
Help please - Deletion review - Articles_for_deletion/Down-ball
Hello Daniel, it looks like you're experienced in Deletion review. I'm a relative Wikipedia newcomer and I'd like to request your assistance in helping me follow the process. No problem if you're already busy. Rockycape (talk) 02:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC)