Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boeing VC-137C: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Closing as speedy delete |
→[[Boeing VC-137C]]: change discussion tags to afd tags |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
{{discussion top}} |
|||
I just created this article in an attempt to have an article on both the Boeing 707's that served as Air Force One from 1962-2001 (SAM 26000 and SAM 27000). After writing a bit I wondered if it might just be easier to create two seperate articles on SAM 26000 and SAM 27000. Thus this page should be deleted as to not cause confusion and wasted space. [[User:Happyme22|Happyme22]] 02:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
I just created this article in an attempt to have an article on both the Boeing 707's that served as Air Force One from 1962-2001 (SAM 26000 and SAM 27000). After writing a bit I wondered if it might just be easier to create two seperate articles on SAM 26000 and SAM 27000. Thus this page should be deleted as to not cause confusion and wasted space. [[User:Happyme22|Happyme22]] 02:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
::Then you probably want <nowiki>{{db-self}}</nowiki> or, more likely to use a redirect. [[User:Mister.Manticore|Mister.Manticore]] 02:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
::Then you probably want <nowiki>{{db-self}}</nowiki> or, more likely to use a redirect. [[User:Mister.Manticore|Mister.Manticore]] 02:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. My advice would be to have just one article on two nearly identical aircraft. The call sign (role) is more important than the airframes themselves. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 03:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. My advice would be to have just one article on two nearly identical aircraft. The call sign (role) is more important than the airframes themselves. --[[User:Dhartung|Dhartung]] | [[User talk:Dhartung|Talk]] 03:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
*A '''merge/redirect''' to [[C-137 Stratoliner]] would probably be appropriate here. The VC-137C appears to be a special variant of the C-137 Stratoliner. There's probably room within the [[C-137 Stratoliner]] article to talk about what makes the VC-137C variant unique, or what modifications they made to it for Air Force One service. [[Air Force One#Boeing_707s_as_Air_Force_One]] covers the usage of the aircraft and the events that happened on each, but there might be a little bit of room to move text between articles as appropriate. --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 04:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
*A '''merge/redirect''' to [[C-137 Stratoliner]] would probably be appropriate here. The VC-137C appears to be a special variant of the C-137 Stratoliner. There's probably room within the [[C-137 Stratoliner]] article to talk about what makes the VC-137C variant unique, or what modifications they made to it for Air Force One service. [[Air Force One#Boeing_707s_as_Air_Force_One]] covers the usage of the aircraft and the events that happened on each, but there might be a little bit of room to move text between articles as appropriate. --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] <sup>[[User talk:Elkman|(Elkspeak)]]</sup> 04:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
{{ |
{{afd bottom}} |
||
Revision as of 06:42, 21 June 2007
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was : Speedy Deleted under DB-G7 SirFozzie 06:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
I just created this article in an attempt to have an article on both the Boeing 707's that served as Air Force One from 1962-2001 (SAM 26000 and SAM 27000). After writing a bit I wondered if it might just be easier to create two seperate articles on SAM 26000 and SAM 27000. Thus this page should be deleted as to not cause confusion and wasted space. Happyme22 02:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Then you probably want {{db-self}} or, more likely to use a redirect. Mister.Manticore 02:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. My advice would be to have just one article on two nearly identical aircraft. The call sign (role) is more important than the airframes themselves. --Dhartung | Talk 03:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- A merge/redirect to C-137 Stratoliner would probably be appropriate here. The VC-137C appears to be a special variant of the C-137 Stratoliner. There's probably room within the C-137 Stratoliner article to talk about what makes the VC-137C variant unique, or what modifications they made to it for Air Force One service. Air Force One#Boeing_707s_as_Air_Force_One covers the usage of the aircraft and the events that happened on each, but there might be a little bit of room to move text between articles as appropriate. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 04:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.