Jump to content

User talk:SlimVirgin/History 1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ElKabong (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
ElKabong (talk | contribs)
Line 106: Line 106:
==Please get a clue==
==Please get a clue==
Bullshit and lies from you and your fellow bed-buddy admins notwithstanding, the so-called "evidence" placed by the liar Zscout against KaintheScion is something that I did, not him/her. It does not belong in "evidence" against him/her. [[User:ElKabong|ElKabong]]
Bullshit and lies from you and your fellow bed-buddy admins notwithstanding, the so-called "evidence" placed by the liar Zscout against KaintheScion is something that I did, not him/her. It does not belong in "evidence" against him/her. [[User:ElKabong|ElKabong]]
''First, you and Kain are operated by the same person, so if you say something, he has said it. Second, regardless of how justified your complaint is, you could try expressing it politely. Everyone is tired of your extraordinary rudeness, and it's yet another attribute that indicates you and Kain are the same person. SlimVirgin (talk) 15:34, May 23, 2005 (UTC)''
:No, I am not KaintheScion, never have been, never will be. That was a lie concocted by either Tony Sidaway or David Gerard in order to get away with banning me or KaintheScion in violation of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#When_blocking_may_not_be_used Wikipedia policy on using admin powers to get an advantage in content disputes]. As for you, I've seen no evidence that you are operating in good faith either. [[User:ElKabong|ElKabong NOT KaintheScion get it fucking right you idiot]].

Revision as of 15:38, 23 May 2005

Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge.
That's what we're doing.
— Jimbo Wales [1]
File:Pikachu.gif

Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper. — Robert Frost

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12

In case you're interested...

... there's a dispute that has been listed on RfC at Talk:Perverted-Justice.com and so far I'm the only person who's come calling. I'm afraid my one lone opinion against two very entrenched opinions is not going to make terribly much difference... and beyond that, there are several issues that I've never dealt with before personally. (For instance, the webmasters of this site have created a special page for people who visit from the Wikipedia page, decrying certain Wikipedia practices and presenting certain information. I find this curious and I'm not entirely sure how best to deal with it). Anyway, FWIW! · Katefan0(scribble) 00:02, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

  • Bleh! Thanks so much for weighing in. This one will be difficult because, it seems, there are so many anon POV warriors hanging around with either no understanding of or no regard for the way Wikipedia works toward consensus on talk pages... · Katefan0(scribble) 18:23, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
Great editing, SV. You not only improved the writing, but you've raised the article to a much higher level of NPOV and accuracy. In the process you've apparently defused a chronic editing war. Not bad for 24 hours. Cheers, -Willmcw 04:35, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

my theory

File:Yase.jpg

i believe this is either PSYCH or someone associated with him or her thus:

it appears to be a similar style each time. i am almost 90% sure PSYCH has done at least some of it.

PSYCH said he had posted to a left wing blog to tell everyone to attack me. therefore, i believe it is either PSYCH or someone acting on PSYCH's advice (e.g. Buffy05 who Tim Starling told me used the same IP as PSYCH). Mind you they keep on using different IPs it is quite hard to stop. Xtra 09:46, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. the person also constantly deletes the link to the PSYCH arbitration. Xtra 09:51, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AD/CE

Thank you for noticing. It means a lot to me. Tom Haws 18:05, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Holocaust photos

I dare say all the photos are copyvios and need to be removed. I was much more cavalier about such things at that time. Are you making any progress towards restarting on the text? Adam 06:38, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I will mention it to him. Adam 07:08, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

LaRouche again

Hello SlimVirgin, since you're somewhat of an expert on the LaRouche articles, I'd like to ask for your help in the german ones. We have a user complaining about several factual errors in the article (de:Lyndon LaRouche and de:Diskussion:Lyndon LaRouche#Neuformatierung zwecks besserer Übersicht, bottom of the discussion page). It centers around the following questions: was LaRouche in later elections (not his first one) running as independent president candidate or as a democratic candidate (I didn't get the description in the english article), can he be considered as a trotzkist in one phase of his life, should the voices who critized the judgement in his law case be mentioned in the article etc. Could you give your opinion on this? The article is currently protected since the user made some POV changes in the article and an edit-war followed, he calls now for a NPOV message above the article. --Elian 15:08, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

At least the German version is under 10,000 words. -Willmcw 15:54, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
Well, it is at the moment. SlimVirgin (talk) 15:55, May 20, 2005 (UTC)

MacDonald fan

Another Kevin MacDonald fan has shown up and started editing; I thought you might be interested. Jayjg (talk) 17:26, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and if you have a chance, would you mind taking a look at WP:AN/I#Anonymous user at Gaza_Strip, Israel unilateral disengagement plan of 2004? Jayjg (talk) 19:13, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

On my talk page, you wrote:

Hi Mirv, the reason I put the vprotect tag on the above is because it was an anon IP reverting five times in, I believe, just over 20 minutes with "RaHoWa!" as an edit summary. Not that it makes any difference, but I just wanted to let you know my reasoning. SlimVirgin (talk) 17:33, May 20, 2005 (UTC)

That's understandable; protecting is the best way to deal with anonymous POV-warring when blocks are impossible, as with large shared proxies like 168.209.98.35 (talk · contribs). I still think it should be treated as POV-warring rather than vandalism, though. —Charles P. (Mirv) 17:39, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good image

Good image you added on primate. It adds alot ot the article. Thanks, Sam Spade 09:19, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of self-proclaimed deities

SlimVirgin, I would appreciate some help with List of self-proclaimed deities. The article has numerous problems and one editor with a too obvious "pride of authorship" makes it extraordinarily difficult. Could you help? Thanks. Do you have experience with "bullying" editors? What is the best way to encurage them to collaborate? --Zappaz 15:53, 22 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Israel

Hi Slim: Please contact User:Humus sapiens who wishes to start a Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Israel See his request below. Thanks IZAK 06:10, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IZAK (and everyone else here :), Do you think it's time to create Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Israel similar to Wikipedia:Wikiportal/India, Wikipedia:Wikiportal/New Zealand and other Category:Wikiportals? I'm writing this here because it was you who made those wonderful templates and we don't have a portal yet where we could communicate. What do you think? Humus sapiensTalk 05:26, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Humus, it's only me here, but I will pass your message on to "everyone". Yes, your suggestion is excellent, it is certainly time for what you describe, but I have no experience with Wikipedia portals, and if you know how, go ahead and start an Israel portal and I am sure editors of Israel-related articles will support you and join in the effort/s. Behatzlachah. IZAK 05:33, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Human

References that I added are available in the version I created (in the main text or in the intertext <!-- -->). There are several of them, you just have to find them.

As for the image captions, I obviously forgot to add that this should be done only where it is reasonable (but it should be done there, in my opinion). I already wrote it, but it seems that I removed that before posting.

It would also be great if you implemented my review of the section on coagulation factors and hereditary disorders in the article. Reference: V. Kumar, R.S. Cotran, S.L. Robbins. Robbins Basic Pathology. W.B. Saunders Company; 7th edition (June 15, 2002). ISBN 0721692745.

Perhaps the section should be even removed, as I don't think it is very significant for the article "Human". So many other diseases affect humanity much more (cancer, AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, even common cold).

You can also add something about puberty (including environmental factors), disablement and homosexuality - although not being from any of these groups, I would appreciate that very much.

Otherwise, you'll probably be very glad to hear that I don't have much time to participate in the project now (and even less for contributing to "Human" with its edit wars and lengthy discussions). If I will edit at all, my changes will mainly be small changes (links, references) and adding images, unless I find something seriously flawed, according to the pre-existing literature.

I hope you found at least some of the changes I made useful. If you did not, you can think whatever you want, I won't argue with you. Regards and thanks for showing me new aspects of Wikipedia. --Eleassar777 08:34, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, although perhaps you have read Wikipedia:Editing policy already, do it again, as I did too and saw where I have been making mistakes. What is important: Perfection is not necessary. With all respect. --Eleassar777 14:36, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please get a clue

Bullshit and lies from you and your fellow bed-buddy admins notwithstanding, the so-called "evidence" placed by the liar Zscout against KaintheScion is something that I did, not him/her. It does not belong in "evidence" against him/her. ElKabong First, you and Kain are operated by the same person, so if you say something, he has said it. Second, regardless of how justified your complaint is, you could try expressing it politely. Everyone is tired of your extraordinary rudeness, and it's yet another attribute that indicates you and Kain are the same person. SlimVirgin (talk) 15:34, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

No, I am not KaintheScion, never have been, never will be. That was a lie concocted by either Tony Sidaway or David Gerard in order to get away with banning me or KaintheScion in violation of Wikipedia policy on using admin powers to get an advantage in content disputes. As for you, I've seen no evidence that you are operating in good faith either. ElKabong NOT KaintheScion get it fucking right you idiot.