Jump to content

Abortifacient: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎External links: delete "Sister Zeus" external link spam; not a WP:RS
→‎References: Re-add Sister Zeus - this is about as reliable as you get for herbal abortifacients
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
== Pre-implantation labeling controversy==
== Pre-implantation labeling controversy==


Some substances might prevent implantation and thus destroy the blastocyst, although their known primary effect is to prevent fertilization. The existence of these post-fertilization mechanisms is debated.<ref name="hormonal">{{cite journal | title = Emergency Contraception's Mode of Action Clarified | journal = Population Briefs | volume = 11 | issue = 2 | publisher = Population Council | date = May 2005 | url = http://www.popcouncil.org/publications/popbriefs/pb11(2)_3.html Article | accessdate = 2007-07-08 }}<br>
There is [[beginning of pregnancy controversy|controversy]] as to whether pregnancy begins at the moment of [[Fertilisation|fertilization]], or at the moment the [[blastocyst]] implants in the [[Endometrium|uterine lining]]. Some substances are believed by some people to prevent implantation and thus destroy the blastocyst, although their primary effect is to prevent fertilization. American federal law and British law mark the beginning of pregnancy at implantation; thus, these substances are labeled as [[contraceptives]], rather than abortifacients. A former [[American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists|ACOG]] president noted in an [[Op-Ed]] column that the [[emergency contraception|emergency contraceptive pill]] Plan B is not effective if taken after implantation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.jhasim.com/files/articlefiles/pdf/ASIM_Master_5_6_p283_284.pdf |title=Emergency Contraception: Out of Sight, Out of Mind? |accessdate=2006-08-03 |author=Dickerson, Vivian M. |year=2005 |month=June |format=PDF |work=Advanced Studies in Medicine, Vol. 5, No. 6 |publisher= Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine|pages=283-284}}</ref> A "Facts on Abortion" webpage of the American [[pro-life]] organization Pro-Life America[http://www.prolife.com] says "'Birth Control' Pills cause early Abortions."<ref>{{cite web | last = Finn | first = J.T. | title = "Birth Control" Pills cause early Abortions | work = Pro-Life America — Facts on Abortion | publisher = prolife.com | date = 2005-04-23 | url = http://www.prolife.com/BIRTHCNT.html | accessdate = 2006-08-25 }}</ref>
{{cite web |author = Crockett, Susan A.; Harrison, Donna; DeCook, Joe; Hersh, Camilla |title=Hormone Contraceptives Controversies and Clarifications. | url=http://www.aaplog.org/decook.htm | year=1999 | publisher = [[American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists|American Association of Pro Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] | accessdate=2007-07-08}}<br>
{{cite web | last = Alcorn | first = Randy | title = Does the Birth Control Pill Cause Abortions? | publisher = Eternal Perspective Ministries | year = 2004 | url = http://www.epm.org/pdf/bcpill.pdf | accessdate = 2007-07-08 }}</ref> There is [[beginning of pregnancy controversy|controversy]] as to whether pregnancy begins at the moment of [[Fertilisation|fertilization]], or at the moment the [[blastocyst]] implants in the [[Endometrium|uterine lining]]. American federal law and British law mark the beginning of pregnancy at implantation; thus, even if post-fertilization mechanisms were proven, these substances would still be labeled as [[contraceptives]], rather than abortifacients.


The following birth control methods have been proposed to sometimes prevent implantation of a blastocyst, although (except as noted) they primarily work by preventing fertilization:
According to an "Abortion Facts" webpage of the American pro-life organization [[Center for Bio-Ethical Reform|The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform]][http://www.cbrinfo.org], the following agents may prevent implantation of a blastocyst, although in most cases they also prevent fertilization:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cbrinfo.org/Resources/fastfacts.html |title=Abortion Facts |accessdate=2006-08-03|publisher=[[Center for Bio-Ethical Reform]]}}</ref>


* [[Hormonal contraception|Hormonal contraceptives]]
* [[Hormonal contraception|Hormonal contraceptives]]<ref name="hormonal" />
* [[Intrauterine device]] (IUD)<ref>{{cite journal | author = Stanford J, Mikolajczyk R | title = Mechanisms of action of intrauterine devices: update and estimation of postfertilization effects | journal = Am J Obstet Gynecol | volume = 187 | issue = 6 | pages = 1699-708 | year = 2002 | id = PMID 12501086}}, which cites:
** Combined [[estrogen]] & [[progestogen]]:
:{{cite journal | author = Smart Y, Fraser I, Clancy R, Roberts T, Cripps A | title = Early pregnancy factor as a monitor for fertilization in women wearing intrauterine devices | journal = Fertil Steril | volume = 37 | issue = 2 | pages = 201-4 | year = 1982 | id = PMID 6174375}}</ref>
*** [[Combined oral contraceptive pill]] ("The Pill")*
* The [[Lactational Amenorrhea Method]] may cause a [[luteal phase]] defect (LPD). LPD may interfere with the implantation of embryos.<!--
*** [[Contraceptive patch]]
*** [[NuvaRing|Contraceptive vaginal ring]]
*** Lunelle (monthly injection)
** Progestogen used alone:
*** [[Emergency contraception|Emergency contraceptive pill]]*
*** [[Progestogen only pill]] (POP)*
*** [[Depo-Provera]] (injection every three months)
*** [[Implant (medicine)|Implant]]s (such as [[Norplant|Norplant/Jadelle]] or [[Implanon]])
*** [[IntraUterine System]] (IUS)
* [[Intrauterine device]] (IUD)*
* Some herbal contraceptives may work primarily by preventing implantation
*The [[Lactational Amenorrhea Method]] may cause a [[luteal phase]] defect (LPD). LPD may interfere with the implantation of embryos.<!--
--><ref name="Diaz, S. et. al">{{cite journal | author = Díaz S, Cárdenas H, Brandeis A, Miranda P, Salvatierra A, Croxatto H | title = Relative contributions of anovulation and luteal phase defect to the reduced pregnancy rate of breastfeeding women. | journal = Fertil Steril | volume = 58 | issue = 3 | pages = 498-503 | year = 1992 | id = PMID 1521642}}</ref>
--><ref name="Diaz, S. et. al">{{cite journal | author = Díaz S, Cárdenas H, Brandeis A, Miranda P, Salvatierra A, Croxatto H | title = Relative contributions of anovulation and luteal phase defect to the reduced pregnancy rate of breastfeeding women. | journal = Fertil Steril | volume = 58 | issue = 3 | pages = 498-503 | year = 1992 | id = PMID 1521642}}</ref>
*[[Fertility awareness]] methods - a [[philosophy]] professor has speculated that intercourse during the less-fertile times of the cycle might create embryos incapable of implanting (due to aged gametes at the time of fertilization).<!--
* [[Fertility awareness]] methods it has been speculated that intercourse during the less-fertile times of the cycle might create embryos incapable of implanting (due to aged gametes at the time of fertilization).<!--
--><ref>{{cite journal |author=Bovens, Luc |year=2006 |title=The rhythm method and embryonic death |journal=J Med Ethics |volume=32 |issue=6 |pages=355-6 |id=PMID 16731736 |url=http://jme.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/32/6/355.pdf}}</ref>
--><ref>{{cite journal |author=Bovens, Luc |year=2006 |title=The rhythm method and embryonic death |journal=J Med Ethics |volume=32 |issue=6 |pages=355-6 |id=PMID 16731736 |url=http://jme.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/32/6/355.pdf}}</ref>
* Some herbal contraceptives may work primarily by preventing implantation.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Sharma MM, Lal G, Jacob D |title=Estrogenic and pregnancy interceptory effects of carrot daucus carota seeds |journal=Indian J. Exp. Biol. |volume=14 |issue=4 |pages=506-8 |year=1976 |pmid=992821 }}</ref>

(*) These methods may also be used as [[emergency contraception]].


==References==
==References==
<references />
<references />

==External Links==
* [http://www.sisterzeus.com/List.htm SisterZeus on Pregnancy Termination]



{{BirthControl}}
{{BirthControl}}

Revision as of 17:23, 8 July 2007

An abortifacient is a substance that induces abortion.

History

The ancient Greek colony of Cyrene at one time had an economy based almost entirely on the production and export of silphium, a powerful abortifacient in the parsley family. Silphium figured so prominently in the wealth of Cyrene that the plant appeared on the obverse and reverse of coins minted there. Silphium, which was native only to that part of Libya, was overharvested by the Greeks and was effectively driven to extinction. The standard theory, however, has been challenged by a whole spectrum of alternatives (from an extinction due to climate factors, to the so-coveted product being in fact a recipe made of a composite of herbs, attribution to a single species meant perhaps as a disinformation attempt).

As the Catholic Church gained control of European society, women who dispensed abortifacient herbs found themselves classified as witches and were often persecuted (see witch-hunt). [1]

Present time

Herbal abortifacients

Many herbs and plants sold "over the counter" today, including Wild carrot, Black cohosh, Pennyroyal, Nutmeg, Mugwort, Papaya, and Common Rue are themselves abortifacients. Typically the labeling will contraindicate use by pregnant women, but will not contain an explanation for this contraindication. There is little available data on their efficacy.

King's American Dispensatory of 1898 recommended a mixture of brewer's yeast and pennyroyal tea as "a safe and certain abortive"

Pharmaceutical abortifacients

Mifepristone, a progesterone receptor competitive antagonist, was first approved in 1988 under the trade name Mifegyne for medical termination of early pregnancy in conjunction with a prostaglandin analogue. Mifepristone, also known as RU-486, is marketed under the trade name Mifegyne in France and countries other than the U.S., and under the trade name Mifeprex in the U.S.

Misoprostol, a synthetic prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) analogue, was first approved in 1988 under the trade name Cytotec for reducing the risk of NSAID-induced gastric ulcers. Misoprostol is approved in France under the trade name GyMiso for use with mifepristone for medical abortion. Misoprostol is used off-label with mifepristone for medical abortion in the U.S.

Misoprostol alone is sometimes used for self-induced abortion in Latin American countries where legal abortion is not available, and by some immigrants from these countries in the United States who cannot afford a legal abortion.

Pre-implantation labeling controversy

Some substances might prevent implantation and thus destroy the blastocyst, although their known primary effect is to prevent fertilization. The existence of these post-fertilization mechanisms is debated.[2] There is controversy as to whether pregnancy begins at the moment of fertilization, or at the moment the blastocyst implants in the uterine lining. American federal law and British law mark the beginning of pregnancy at implantation; thus, even if post-fertilization mechanisms were proven, these substances would still be labeled as contraceptives, rather than abortifacients.

The following birth control methods have been proposed to sometimes prevent implantation of a blastocyst, although (except as noted) they primarily work by preventing fertilization:

References

  1. ^ Kramer, Heinrich, & Sprenger, Jacob. (1487). Malleus Maleficarum. (Montague Summers, Trans.). Retrieved June 3, 2006.
  2. ^ a b Article "Emergency Contraception's Mode of Action Clarified". Population Briefs. 11 (2). Population Council. May 2005. Retrieved 2007-07-08. {{cite journal}}: Check |url= value (help)
    Crockett, Susan A.; Harrison, Donna; DeCook, Joe; Hersh, Camilla (1999). "Hormone Contraceptives Controversies and Clarifications". American Association of Pro Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Retrieved 2007-07-08.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
    Alcorn, Randy (2004). "Does the Birth Control Pill Cause Abortions?" (PDF). Eternal Perspective Ministries. Retrieved 2007-07-08.
  3. ^ Stanford J, Mikolajczyk R (2002). "Mechanisms of action of intrauterine devices: update and estimation of postfertilization effects". Am J Obstet Gynecol. 187 (6): 1699–708. PMID 12501086., which cites:
    Smart Y, Fraser I, Clancy R, Roberts T, Cripps A (1982). "Early pregnancy factor as a monitor for fertilization in women wearing intrauterine devices". Fertil Steril. 37 (2): 201–4. PMID 6174375.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^ Díaz S, Cárdenas H, Brandeis A, Miranda P, Salvatierra A, Croxatto H (1992). "Relative contributions of anovulation and luteal phase defect to the reduced pregnancy rate of breastfeeding women". Fertil Steril. 58 (3): 498–503. PMID 1521642.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ Bovens, Luc (2006). "The rhythm method and embryonic death" (PDF). J Med Ethics. 32 (6): 355–6. PMID 16731736.
  6. ^ Sharma MM, Lal G, Jacob D (1976). "Estrogenic and pregnancy interceptory effects of carrot daucus carota seeds". Indian J. Exp. Biol. 14 (4): 506–8. PMID 992821.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

External Links