User talk:Eidah

Handshake

Hmm, a Dutch Anti-Zionist with a thing for Dushinsky, the Eidah, and Givat Shaul... At the very least, I have to give you credit for sticking to your guns. This time, lets work together. You have a lot to say. Maybe I can help refine the message, and make it acceptable for Wikipedia. Despite your protestations, I am not a Zionist. And my edits to some of your friend Daniel's posts were kinder and gentler than others would have allowed had they gotten there first. --Meshulam 04:38, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Amen to that, brothers. Now keep in mind all those halochos of bein odom lechaveiro. -- Y not? 16:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

3RR

I believe you just violated WP:3RR on Neturei Karta. Please self-revert. Thank you. -- Avi 15:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Courtesy notice - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Eidah_reported_by_User:Avraham_.28Result:.29 -- Avi 15:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Neturei Karta. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. MastCell ^Talk 18:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Extremist

The word extremist is a problem because its POV. It is possible to say that one side views the other side as extremist. But it is not ok to quote the leading figure in one side of the conflict as proof that the other side is extremist. Yes, your edits comply with WP:OR. But they do not comply with WP:POV. I suggest that it be changed to something suggesting that one side considers the other side "extremist." Then show how. Then, maybe, provide (sourced) examples.--Meshulam 11:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

The other thing to remember is that if you're perceived as being a pain, you'll never win an edit war. And a 24 hr block means that everyone gets free reign on the articles in question until you're done. And then if you go back to edit warring, they'll just block you again. If you can reach a consensus (I'll help you on this one), then things will be more permanant.--Meshulam 01:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

With respect to your statement on my page: better, perhaps, to say that people consider them extremist. Extremist is a POV term. If you say that they are considered extremist (and name who thinks they're extremist... like Satmar Rebbeim, for example), then you aren't giving your POV, but rather reporting on facts. --Meshulam 23:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Torah v'Yiroh

I agree that it is beautiful. In the States' Torah v'Yiroh is normally a Satmar name. Is that Beis Midrash affiliated with Satmar? I thought NK was independent.--Meshulam 21:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

No, it's Rav Katzenellenbogen's BM. See the NK article! There is a Satmar yeshiva in the same building, but they are not really affiliated, though of course there are friendly ties. Just that on Yom Ha'atzamos, the mourning is a bit more intense at NK then at Satmar. Aside from that they're basically the same. But it is a separate group - for example, at NK, the nusach is Ashkenaz (nusach haGro). It's right next to the shtieblach in M.S., on the 2nd floor. If you're ever here, it's definitely worth a visit. BEAUTIFUL. Compare with [1] - before the renovation! --Eidah 21:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Category:Orthodox Jewish Anti-Zionism

Hi Eidah: See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 August 22#Category:Orthodox Jewish Anti-Zionism. Thank you. IZAK 13:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Various edits of yours

For example [2] All I can say is:

1. It is Chodesh Elul
2. Michah, Vav, Ches
3. Kol Hamevayish Pnei Chavero B'rabim…
4. Any positive effect you can think of by using kana'us is more than outweighed by even the slightest chillul HaShem you may cause.
5. Please think long and hard about what you believe your goal here is, realizing that ad bi'as goel tzedek we are in galus.

-- Avi 15:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)