Jump to content

User talk:Anetode/archive 11: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Barateiro (talk | contribs)
Line 96: Line 96:
Please note that your language in my talk pages was particularly disrespectful. Please behave.--[[User:Barateiro|Barateiro]] 21:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Please note that your language in my talk pages was particularly disrespectful. Please behave.--[[User:Barateiro|Barateiro]] 21:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
:You said that one does not '''add photographs of a famous woman's breasts because you find them more titillating'''. That is not the issue; and that's precisely where you are disrespectful. Her bresats are more famous than herself, and her reputation is mainly because of her mammary glands. --[[User:Barateiro|Barateiro]] 21:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
:You said that one does not '''add photographs of a famous woman's breasts because you find them more titillating'''. That is not the issue; and that's precisely where you are disrespectful. Her bresats are more famous than herself, and her reputation is mainly because of her mammary glands. --[[User:Barateiro|Barateiro]] 21:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

:As you have noticed, I always try to explain facts to users. When they do not understand, and instead suggest that "revolution" is a better way to change things than consensus, it means mediation is just a waste of time. He is just about to be blocked for 3RR, from what I see. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 21:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:34, 23 September 2007

I will respond on your talk page unless you specify otherwise.


proposal

I put a proposal at User:CBM/NFCC Proposal‎. Please feel free to edit it. — Carl (CBM · talk) 19:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


Template:Unreferenced

Please remove the icon you just added to Template:Unreferenced, there is an active discussion and consensus has not been reached. Jeepday (talk) 04:22, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

I can tell you don't care about debate, but you made the change to a protected template and I would appreciate it if you would undo the change. Thanks Jeepday (talk) —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 04:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Deleted Archive Page

I found the following, but I don't understand what happened. At this point, all I want is to review the deleted material. Then I'd be interested in doing whatever is necessary so that the archived pages are safe from bots.


Notice: You are re-creating a page that was deleted.
You should consider whether it is appropriate to continue editing this page. Information is available on what to do if a page you created is deleted. The deletion log for this page is provided here for convenience:

I clicked on TW -- don't know what it is, don't care ... but if this edit summary is saying that I'd done something other than save to archive in an unremarkable way, there is some sort of error. --Ooperhoofd 12:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I now understand part of what I myself could have done differently. Maybe this is one of those small (but important) lessons which are best learned the hard way. --Ooperhoofd 23:15, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Meganfoxjpg.jpg

Antedote-

Bohemiandelight here, uploader of Meganfoxjpg. I am writing to clarify the deletion of this image.

The producer of the image has given me express permission to assist in publishing her images for Wiki pages. I contacted her previous to uploading the image and received her endorsement.

I will be uploading more of her images which are typically celebrity photos.

I want to avoid future deletions and seek your advise as to why the image was deleted and how to prevent future complications.

As far as my research has shown the image license establishes free attributed use of the image. Combined with her specific permission for use in this forum; I do not see where the problem is.

I do not want to be divisive or contradict Wiki policies, yet I am intent on assisting Wiki's content by providing images that are suitable for use on pages that benefit from their submission.

Please advise, Thanks,

Bohemiandelight 20:55, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Wow, Anetode, thanks for the very thorough response!

I am in the process of contacting the author with the information you provided.

It is most likely that she will decide to change the licensing on Flickr. Otherwise I will forward a permission letter as advised.

I apprteciate your help and time on this matter.

She has a ton of very high quality images that will add to Wiki's appearance and presence on the web.

Thanks, Bohemiandelight 21:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Transcend Tsonic

Hey dude, all the images of the Transcend Tsonic, that were uploaded by me 3 days ago, are free to use for non-commercial reasons, so can you please change the copyright status, as I will be going out of town soo. --Rsrikanth05 15:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Thank you, I'll try and see what I can do. --Rsrikanth05 09:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC) I'll take a few pictures, at the store and post them, that way, I can release them under the GNU license right? --Rsrikanth05 09:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC) -Okay Thanks. --Rsrikanth05 09:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Also, how did you make that signature of yours?--Rsrikanth05 09:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD "The Fragments

Even though I'm listed as the creator, I merely moved it to avoid the obvious naming conflicts. I've notified the original creator and voted to delete per nominator. Thanks. Mbisanz 06:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey

Thanks for keeping an eye on my userpage and talk! Much appreciated :) ~ Riana 12:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Just want to say

Thank you for deleting my bands page, and not giving them a chance. That was very considerate of you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forever88 (talkcontribs) 01:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Nice find!

On these photos at Flickr. I notice that a lot of the actresses aren't identified by name in the pictures, could you use some help from the WP:P* people on identifying folks? Videmus Omnia Talk 03:06, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Please note that your language in my talk pages was particularly disrespectful. Please behave.--Barateiro 21:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

You said that one does not add photographs of a famous woman's breasts because you find them more titillating. That is not the issue; and that's precisely where you are disrespectful. Her bresats are more famous than herself, and her reputation is mainly because of her mammary glands. --Barateiro 21:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
As you have noticed, I always try to explain facts to users. When they do not understand, and instead suggest that "revolution" is a better way to change things than consensus, it means mediation is just a waste of time. He is just about to be blocked for 3RR, from what I see. -- ReyBrujo 21:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)