User talk:GodGnipael

Hello GodGnipael, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Fuhghettaboutit 03:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Moscoto

Your edit [1] does not follow the manual of style for how to correctly create wikilinks; and there is not reason not to have a link to Muscat. Perhaps you would like to explain why you think your edit is improving the article on its talk page: Talk:Moscato. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 02:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Sign your comments

As a courtesy for other editors, kindly observe Wikipedia guidelines and sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added. For further info see: Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thanks. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Personal attack warning

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Gwernol 03:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Melatonin

Hi there. Please have a look at our neutral point of view policy. "Dangerous Side Effects" is not an appropriate section heading; it is unnecessarily sensationalistic. Facts speak for themselves—there is no need to editorialize. I won't revert your edit, but I would appreciate it if you could help make content more neutral and impartial. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)