User talk:Alexander Feht: Difference between revisions
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
And lastly: legal threats are sufficient to get you banned until you rescind the threats. Please do so [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 08:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC) |
And lastly: legal threats are sufficient to get you banned until you rescind the threats. Please do so [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] 08:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Regarding your signiture at Global Warming talk page == |
|||
Re:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Global_warming&diff=prev&oldid=161741707 this edit]. It's not nit-picking. By inserting your name that way, your words were being attributed/assigned to a different user. Putting "Alexander" between the brackets sends everyone, who clicks on the name following ''your'' comments, directly to ''his'' page (try it, [[User:Alexander]]). Surely you can see how that is, at the very least misleading, and if done intentionally (at this point, I'm guessing that is not the case) extremely dishonest. [[User:R. Baley|R. Baley]] 08:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:32, 2 October 2007
Welcome!
Hi Alexander Feht! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Brusegadi 03:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
A message from you - legal threats
You said:
- You have repeatedly removed my topic-related, polite comments from the GW discussion page on Wikipedia. You did the same to many other Wikipedia users.
- The fact that one uses a satellite network as an IP provider should not make one a pariah, excluded from discussion. The fact that you are a researcher in British Antarctic Survey, an organization critically interested in financing resulting from the GW scaremongering, makes you a very partial voice in any GW debate, and, therefore, unqualified to use administrative privileges on climate-related discussion pages.
- Your bias is obvious: you are silencing your opponents by abusing your administrative privileges. Please, refrain from further unethical activity on Wikipedia discussion pages.
- Regardless of your answer or lack of an answer, I will pursue this matter further through legal channels.
- Thank you for your attention,
To which I answer: I've removed irrelevance, and so have others. Please try to show some discipline and discuss only matters relevant to the topic at hand. Sadly, t:GW suffers from bloat. You were a pariah because of your comments, not for being anon. Do you not understand that signing comments as though you were a different, totally unrelated user, is unacceptable?
And lastly: legal threats are sufficient to get you banned until you rescind the threats. Please do so William M. Connolley 08:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Regarding your signiture at Global Warming talk page
Re:this edit. It's not nit-picking. By inserting your name that way, your words were being attributed/assigned to a different user. Putting "Alexander" between the brackets sends everyone, who clicks on the name following your comments, directly to his page (try it, User:Alexander). Surely you can see how that is, at the very least misleading, and if done intentionally (at this point, I'm guessing that is not the case) extremely dishonest. R. Baley 08:32, 2 October 2007 (UTC)