User talk:61.68.54.158

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Doczilla (talk) 09:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Do not edit other people's user pages. That's considered vandalism or at least very inconsiderate. What I write on my talk page is my business. Doczilla (talk) 09:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Trusilver, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Doczilla (talk) 09:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Doczilla, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Doczilla (talk) 09:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to George Herbert, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Doczilla (talk) 09:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC) (Yes, I said the previous one was last, but it seems unfair to get you blocked for vandalism when this one actually happened earlier.) Doczilla (talk) 09:47, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

61.68.54.158

I said i wouldnt do it again. Lol How you find those edits so fast anyway? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.54.158 (talk • contribs)

You said you wouldn't do it again by doing it again. Doczilla (talk) 09:47, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Dreadstar † 09:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61.68.54.158 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was bout to do something helpful

Decline reason:

You were told that if you continued, you'd be blocked. There is evidence to suggest that you would continue to vandalize, but none to suggest that you'd do anything helpful. WODUP 10:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61.68.54.158 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I stopped.

Decline reason:

Please don't make multiple unblock requests when we have made it quite clear that you're not going to be unblocked — Chris 11:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Impersonating a faggot ass cock sucker

Attempting to grant your own unblock request [1] and then impersonating an administrator [2] wasn't the best way to demonstrate an intent to become helpful. Even if you did turn around and undo that yourself, attempting something like that in the first place does not bode well.... Wtf i was just testing shit. Faggots. Doczilla (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008

Your recent edit to Portal:Mathematics (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 11:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to George Herbert, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ^{Rocket71048576}∞_Talk 11:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

LMAO!!! ANOTHER ABUSE OF YOUR POWER! YOUR PROBABLY SOME CHILD RAPIST.