Jump to content

User talk:Colonel Warden: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
NeilN (talk | contribs)
→‎Dude: new section
Line 68: Line 68:


[[User:Lordvolton|Lordvolton]] ([[User talk:Lordvolton|talk]]) 11:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
[[User:Lordvolton|Lordvolton]] ([[User talk:Lordvolton|talk]]) 11:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

== [[Dude]] ==

You might want to give me a couple minutes before issuing an ultimatum, eh? --[[User:NeilN|'''<font color="#003F87">Neil<font color="#CD0000">N</font></font>''']] <sup><font face="Calibri">''[[User talk:NeilN|<font color="#003F87">talk</font>]] ♦ [[Special:Contributions/NeilN|<font color="#CD0000">contribs</font>]]''</font></sup> 12:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:46, 2 March 2008

Notice of ANI Thread

Dear Colonel Warden, I notice that you have participated in this discussion. Anyway, please see here. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 20:11, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thanks. Colonel Warden (talk) 20:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Your comment at AFD

I have just as much right to edit the encyclopedia as an unregistered user as you do as a registered one. It is my choice. Contributions from IPs should be given equal weight to those from usernames. Please try and be more understading and/or civil - and try and avoid making borderline personl attacks. Thanks. 78.86.18.55 (talk) 00:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Filed in the "Hacker" article

In accordance with clause (4) of the Arbitration Filing Procedure, you are hereby being notified that you have been mentioned as a contributing party to the article and you can make a statement.

You can find the claim, and make your statement here.

I am required to tell you this information I am the filing party for the arbitration claim.

Andrew81446 (talk) 06:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

award

The Barnstar of Good Humor
I award User:Colonel Warden for providing humor on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gun fu while adding refs at the article at the same time. Lenticel (talk) 12:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I awaited to see if the Afd was kept before giving this award. I think I forgot it for some time. --Lenticel (talk) 12:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page

Yeah, I'm going to try to be conservative here for now. As long as he doesn't actually disrupt us making forward progress I don't think action is necessary. We'll see how long that lasts. Nandesuka (talk) 12:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

I'd like to thank you for your reasoned defense of my contributions regarding the history of communism and genocide. When trying to bring this subject up, as you can see, everything but the kitchen sink is thrown at the contributors. I'm grateful to have at least one unbiased person defending the article. Mrdarklight (talk) 19:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just edited the main page for Communism to include a direct link to the disputed article. Now watch what happens. Mrdarklight (talk) 20:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vector (spatial)

At this AfD discussion, you have repeatedly alluded to various problems you have with the vector (spatial) article. I was wondering if you would mind posting some suggestions on the talk page of the article in question? I'm currently planning a major revision (or, at least, to finish the revision I started about a year ago). I would very much like to take your advice into consideration. Thanks, Silly rabbit (talk) 02:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for taking the time to post such a thoughtful and detailed response at Talk:Vector (spatial). I will definitely use your suggestions. Regards, Silly rabbit (talk) 14:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Criticism is easier than creation so you now have the hard job. :) Colonel Warden (talk) 15:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dudes and Dandys

I'm sorry, but redirecting without first getting consensus isn't the right thing to do. The words have clearly different meanings and usages. Far better to suggest a Merge using the {{mergeto}} tag and letting editors have a say, rather than imposing your view. Please join the discussion I started at Talk:Dude and let a discussion play out. Hopefully consensus will emerge. Thanks, Gwernol 11:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC) Already found that, thanks. Colonel Warden (talk) 11:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Measurement Causes Collapse

You might find this interesting:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement_causes_collapse

And their unfortunate attempt to delete it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Measurement_causes_collapse

Lordvolton (talk) 11:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to give me a couple minutes before issuing an ultimatum, eh? --NeilN talkcontribs 12:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]