Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Ukrainian political crisis: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:20, 2 March 2008

2008 Ukrainian political crisis

The current entry is an example of original research and an opinion piece on current affairs in Ukraine. It violates at least the following two wikipedia policies - WP:No original research and WP:SOAP, and consequently should be deleted.--Riurik^(discuss) 05:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - reads like an essay, is always going to attract ethno-warrior-editors, never going to hold a NPOV.— TreasuryTag talkcontribs 07:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, seems to have been more than a U.S. Senate filibuster, but less than a parliamentary crisis of the Westminster system variety. The parliament was non-functional for a while, but this seems to have passed. The government itself was not in danger of falling, from what I can tell. --Dhartung | Talk 07:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOT#NEWS. Also, far too much original research for my liking. EJF (talk) 11:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (on reflection) Having removed the fictitious "NATO membership" and OR concerning implications of resignations from OU, what's left - regardless of who authored it - is an accurate and factual description of the notable current and emerging crises in Ukraine this year. To Dhartung: the blockade continues, the speaker is powerless to convene parliamentary sittingsand the opposition is dictating the terms under which it will temporarily lift the blockade in order to allow debate of specific draft laws of its choosing. Sounds like a crisis to me. To YWP: the defections from OU are the least of the issues; the major issue is the ongoing paralysis of the parlament by the opposition. The one objection I can see to the article in its present form is that because the events are still unfolding the article is being written as news rather than a concise summary with the benefit of hindsight. NOT#NEWS does not prevent this, but it does demand historical notability. If that means that we must wait until we can judge the impact of the present events on Ukraine's history then so be it. -- Timberframe (talk) 19:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The United States have had worse situations, with no mention on Wikipedia. This article reads like it was written about the "Our Ukranian" Party collapsing, which would be a different article. I would either delete or rename this article, and find more sources. YoungWebProgrammer ^msg 16:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (but wait till the blockade is over) cause if it continous there is a crises. The part about Our Ukraine seems to have nothing to de with the blockade or crises and can be placed at Our Ukraine (I already did that anyhowe!) and deleted from this article. Unless somebody can come up with a good source that there related! Mariah-Yulia (talk) 20:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *'''Delete''' [[WP:NOT#NEWS]]. Also, far too much original research for my liking. [[User:EJF|EJF]] ([[User talk:EJF|talk]]) 11:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Delete (on reflection)''' Having removed the fictitious "NATO membership" and OR concerning implications of resignations from OU, what's left - regardless of who authored it - is an accurate and factual description of the notable current and emerging crises in Ukraine this year. To Dhartung: the blockade continues, the speaker is powerless to convene parliamentary sittingsand the opposition is dictating the terms under which it will temporarily lift the blockade in order to allow debate of specific draft laws of its choosing.  Sounds like a crisis to me. To YWP: the defections from OU are the least of the issues; the major issue is the ongoing paralysis of the parlament by the opposition.  The one objection I can see to the article in its present form is that because the events are still unfolding the article is being written as news rather than a concise summary with the benefit of hindsight.  [[NOT#NEWS]] does not prevent this, but it does demand historical notability.  If that means that we must wait until we can judge the impact of the present events on Ukraine's history then so be it. -- [[User:Timberframe|Timberframe]] ([[User talk:Timberframe|talk]]) 19:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
-Disagree too. The info in the article (seems) correct. Try to look at what is written in the article and not who wrote it please. Mariah-Yulia (talk) 20:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
-I did look at what was in the article. Wikipedia cannot invent a "crisis". It is not the job of an encyclopedia to do this. Do you have any reliable sources that say this is a "crisis"? 23:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)]
-The parlement was blocked since 18 jaunuari [1] till next week [2]. If the parlement of UK was blocked the whole world would be shocked... the same thing happening in Ukraine is atleast a crises. I mean, if not what is it? banana republic? Mariah-Yulia (talk) 00:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
-*'''Keep''' Is was blocked on Feb. 5 the other issue is tyhe mass resignation of members from the President's party Our Ukraine. Attemps top delete this article is further examples of selective sensorship which brings Wikipedia into distrpute
 *'''Delete''' The United States have had worse situations, with no mention on Wikipedia. This article reads like it was written about the "Our Ukranian" Party collapsing, which would be a different article. I would either delete or rename this article, and find more sources. [[User:Youngwebprogrammer|<span style="font-size: 13px;font-weight: bold;font: 'Arial'; color:#b0c4de">Young<span style="color:#778899">Web</span>Programmer</span>]] [[User talk:Youngwebprogrammer|<sup style="color:#778899;font-weight: bold">msg</sup>]] 16:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
+*'''Delete (but wait till the blockade is over)''' cause if it continous there is a crises. The part about ''Our Ukraine'' seems to have nothing to de with the blockade or crises and can be placed at [[Our Ukraine]] (I already did that anyhowe!) and deleted from this article. Unless somebody can come up with a good source that there related! [[User:Mariah-Yulia|Mariah-Yulia]] ([[User talk:Mariah-Yulia|talk]]) 20:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)