User talk:Caroline Cognac: Difference between revisions
Goodbye |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Thanks for introducing much-needed grammatical errors into our articles. As a reward, you've been [[WP:BLOCK|blocked indefinitely]]. Thanks for coming! ➨ '''[[User talk:Redvers|REDVEЯS]]''' paints a vulgar picture 21:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for introducing much-needed grammatical errors into our articles. As a reward, you've been [[WP:BLOCK|blocked indefinitely]]. Thanks for coming! ➨ '''[[User talk:Redvers|REDVEЯS]]''' paints a vulgar picture 21:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
==three-revert rule == |
|||
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:Frank Lucas (drug lord)|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Frank Lucas (drug lord)]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> |
|||
Revision as of 13:18, 27 March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishGuy talk 21:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IrishGuy talk 21:12, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Frank Lucas (drug lord), you will be blocked from editing. KnightLago (talk) 21:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. --Please use the edit summary, especially when deleting large portions of text. Taroaldo (talk) 21:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. IrishGuy talk 21:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for introducing much-needed grammatical errors into our articles. As a reward, you've been blocked indefinitely. Thanks for coming! ➨ REDVEЯS paints a vulgar picture 21:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
three-revert rule
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Frank Lucas (drug lord). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.