User talk:Bart Versieck

User talk:Bart Versieck/Archive 1 User talk:Bart Versieck/Archive 2 Current status: > Awaiting posts. Hello! Please, append your message at the end of the page. This page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Welcome to Wikipedia! Goeiedag/Hello Bart Versieck, welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some tips: Take a look at the Simplified Ruleset. Read the Tutorial, How to edit a page and the Manual of Style. Find out how to revert, move and merge pages. Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~). Add yourself to the New user log and a regional notice board Ask questions at the Village pump or Help desk. Use the Show preview button Provide an Edit summary Add the correct image copyright tag to any images you upload Take a look at Consensus of standards Create a User page Be bold Ignore all rules If you feel a change is needed, feel free to make it yourself! Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone (yourself included) can edit any article by following the Edit this page link. Wikipedia convention is to be bold and not be afraid of making mistakes. If you're not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills. If, for some reason, you are unable to fix a problem yourself, feel free to ask someone else to do it. Wikipedia has a vibrant community of contributors who have a wide range of skills and specialties, and many of them would be glad to help. As well as the wiki community pages there are IRC Channels, where you are more than welcome to ask for assistance. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, and happy editing. Oh yeah! Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Lazare Ponticelli. Editorofthewiki 01:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC) I voted in favour. Extremely sexy (talk) 21:19, 13 April 2008 (UTC) EMDT You may be interested in what I wrote here. 125.162.163.120 (talk) 03:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC) It's interesting, but not very useful. Neal (talk) 17:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC) I reacted over there. Extremely sexy (talk) 20:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Hey Bart, in just 5 more days, Edna Parker may reach 115! Wow! We haven't had a verified 115 year-old since January 2007. This will be exciting! Neal (talk) 17:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC). I definitely agree with you, of course. Extremely sexy (talk) 20:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Don't jinx it you guys... I just looked at the talk page of Emiliano Mercado del Toro, and what did HisSpaceResearch do. :( However, I think that this would be usefull on the wikiproject. Editorofthewiki 20:45, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Yes: so fingers crossed, my friend. Extremely sexy (talk) 20:51, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Editing other people's comments How do you justify this edit or this one when you have been blocked and warned countless times for editing others comments and being warned how disruptive it is? Cheers, CP 17:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC) First answer this question of mine: why are you stalking me all the time? Extremely sexy (talk) 18:46, 19 April 2008 (UTC) http://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speciaal%3ALogboeken&type=block&user=&page=Gebruiker%3ABart+Versieck&year=&month=-1 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3ABart+Versieck&year=&month=-1 Maybe that's why? Aleichem (talk) 19:07, 19 April 2008 (UTC) The Dutch Wikipedia is something else and from more than one year ago, you know. Extremely sexy (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Mr. Versieck, what is your response to the countless talk page violations you've committed over the years? Please respond. Postoak (talk) 19:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC) It won't happen again. Extremely sexy (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Also, I would note that I'm not "stalking" you. WP:STALK has a full definition but, most importantly, "stalking" refers to the act of following an editor to another article to continue disruption and proper use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing errors or violations of Wikipedia policy. As a user with an extensive history of disruption on talk pages, it is reasonable to keep an eye on your edits, particularly the ones on talk pages. I am not attempting to continue disruption, but stop it. Cheers, CP 19:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Thanks, dear Paul. Extremely sexy (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Blocked You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. You have been warned plenty of times and been blocked for a week just last month for exactly the same thing, even though you said then you'd got it and immediately went back on your word. Above you say it won't happen again, but why would I believe you now when you've made the same promise at least twice before and forgotten it. Your promises now carry no weight and you need to have some time off to reflect on our policies. Spend the time reading WP:TPG for a start. Your block logs here and at the Dutch Wikipedia are a disgrace and its time you started to show some respect to the rest of the community by following our policies rather than thumbing your nose at us. You do not change other peoples edits. Minor spelling and grammatical errors should be left as you find them. —Moondyne click! 01:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC) Bart, you really got to stop doing this. Soon this will result in an indef block if you don't stop. I will talk to Moondyne about this one, but next time you make small changes to talk pages, I"ll not be doing this anymore. Editorofthewiki 01:57, 20 April 2008 (UTC) Moondyne did Versieck a favor by only blocking him for a week. He deserves to be permanently blocked since he has been repeating the same violation for over a year with the same "I promise not to do it again" response. Postoak (talk) 02:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC) Thankyou for that link Postoak - I hadn't read all of that until now and it only causes me more consternation and I do wonder if Bart has a obsessive/compulsive disorder over which he has limited control. I'm not sure what to do about this issue so have left a note at WP:AN/I#Bart Versieck for more input. —Moondyne click! 06:40, 20 April 2008 (UTC) I was going to let him go with just a warning this time, since I didn't want to be seen as having a vendetta against him, blocking him at every opportunity, but I do hope that he sees that it's a serious concern we have and not just a personal conspiracy. I'm not sure if it can be attributed to a disorder, since one of the edits that I commented on last round was not even a proper correction but, then again, I don't know enough to make that call. Cheers, CP 14:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC) OK, here's the deal Bart. Once this current block expires, you may return to normal editing, However, the very next time you revert another persons talk page edits you will be immediately blocked for 3 months. No warnings will be given. This condition will stand for 12 months. If this is not clear then please let me know. Your behaviour just takes too much time and energy away from people who respect this project and it is my belief that your absence won't be a large loss. I hope that you can start to play by the rules. Moondyne 06:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC) I am, Moondyne. Extremely sexy (talk) 14:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC) WOP Newsletter