Jump to content

User talk:24.147.97.230: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 24.147.97.230 to last version by Gamaliel
Line 31: Line 31:


Do not alter the statement of the dispute again. You are free to respond in your own section at length, but if you forge or alter the comments of others again you will be blocked for vandalism. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 01:21, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
Do not alter the statement of the dispute again. You are free to respond in your own section at length, but if you forge or alter the comments of others again you will be blocked for vandalism. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 01:21, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Read and follow the format and instructions of the RfC. It is not your sandbox and you are not free to spew your rants all over it. You are free to write whatever you want if you stay within the perscribed format and put unrelated material on the talk page. It is not that difficult to understand. Just color inside the lines. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 03:39, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:39, 18 August 2005

Information icon Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thanks!

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Tεxτurε 21:58, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Gamaliel 06:30, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Kennedy

"Surrogate father" doesn't necessarily mean biological father...maybe a different term should be used, but I think it only means to say that he was close to his nieces and nephews. Thus, I reverted your edit. --- Mike 04:47, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, "witnessed" the assassination is loose language, but I'm sure they meant "went through" rather than "saw personally"...you can change the phrasing to that if you think it's clearer. --- Mike 04:49, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is inappropriate to report a dispute over content as vandalism. If you wish other editors to become involved in a content discussion, please use Wikipedia:Requests for comment. Gamaliel 20:04, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect references to vandalism

Your attention is called to Gamaliel's statement on 6 August that it is incorrect to report a dispute over content as vandalism. It is similarly incorrect to indicate in an edit summary that deletion of material whose value is questioned is vandalism. Robert McClenon 15:44, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It Helps to Create an Account

There have been some edits from this IP address that may be reasonable but may be unreasonable. I am not making a judgment.

If anyone has been editing from this address on a subject other than Edward Kennedy, it might be a good idea to create an account in case this address is blocked. Robert McClenon 03:14, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule

Please adhere to the Wikipedia:Three revert rule. The rule applies to users, not accounts or IP addresses, so using another IP address to make additional reverts is not permitted. Gamaliel 16:24, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do not alter the statement of the dispute again. You are free to respond in your own section at length, but if you forge or alter the comments of others again you will be blocked for vandalism. Gamaliel 01:21, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Read and follow the format and instructions of the RfC. It is not your sandbox and you are not free to spew your rants all over it. You are free to write whatever you want if you stay within the perscribed format and put unrelated material on the talk page. It is not that difficult to understand. Just color inside the lines. Gamaliel 03:39, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]