Jump to content

Happy ending problem: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m fix link
Dmharvey (talk | contribs)
lots of changes
Line 3: Line 3:
:'''Theorem.''' Given five points in the plane in [[general position]], it is possible to select four of them that form a [[convex]] [[quadrilateral]].
:'''Theorem.''' Given five points in the plane in [[general position]], it is possible to select four of them that form a [[convex]] [[quadrilateral]].


In a 1935 paper, Erdös and Szekeres proved the following generalisation:
Erdős and Szekeres (1935) proved the following generalisation:


:'''Theorem.''' Given a positive [[integer]] ''N'', there exists a positive integer ''M'' such that among any ''M'' points in the plane in [[general position]], it is possible to select ''N'' of them that form a [[convex]] ''N''-gon.
:'''Theorem.''' Given a positive [[integer]] ''N'', there exists a positive integer ''M'' such that among any ''M'' points in the plane in general position, it is possible to select ''N'' of them that form a convex ''N''-gon.


The original problem is the case ''N'' = 4, in which case the minimal possible ''M'' is 5 (proved by Klein), and the case ''N'' = 3 is trivial (''M'' = 3).
Denoting by ''f''(''N'') the minimal possible ''M'' for which the conclusion holds, it is known that
* ''f''(3) = 3. This is trivial.
* ''f''(4) = 5. This was the original problem, proved by Esther Klein.
* ''f''(5) = 9. According to Erdős and Szekeres (1935), this was first proved by E. Makai; the first published proof appeared in Kalbfleisch et al (1970).
* ''f''(6) = 17. This has been proved by [[George Szekeres]] and Lindsay Peters in work yet to be published. They carried out an exhaustive computer search, essentially examining every possible configuration of 17 points to verify that six of them form a convex hexagon. It is remarkable that Szekeres was writing computer code in [[Fortran]] in his mid-nineties to carry out such a project.
* The value of ''f''(''N'') is unknown for all ''N'' > 6; by the Erdős-Szekeres theorem it is known to be finite.


On the basis of the known values of ''f''(''N'') for ''N'' = 3, 4 and 5, Erdős and Szekeres conjectured in their original paper that
The explicit value of ''M'' = 9 has been determined for the case ''N'' = 5.
:<math>f(N) = 1 + 2^{N-2} \quad \mbox{for all } N \geq 3.</math>
They proved later (Erdős and Szekeres, 1961), by constructing explicit examples, that
:<math>f(N) \geq 1 + 2^{N-2},</math>
but the best known upper bound is only
:<math>f(N) \leq {2n-5 \choose n-3} + 2,</math>
due to Tóth and Valtr (1998) (see [[binomial coefficient]]).


== See also ==
Erdös and Szekeres conjectured that the minimal value of ''M'' is

:<math>M = 1 + 2^{N-2},</math>
* [[Ramsey theory]]
although this has not been proved for any ''N'' strictly greater than 5. In the case of ''N'' = 6, the conjecture would imply that any set of 17 points in the plane (in general position) contains six points forming a convex hexagon. In the last years of his life, George Szekeres had been attempting to test this case computationally by a clever exhaustive search, the main difficulty being to reduce a rather enormous search space to something of a more manageable size.


== References ==
== References ==


* Erdös, P. and Szekeres, G., A combinatorial problem in geometry, ''Compositio Math.'' 2 (1935), 463--470.
* Erdős, P., Szekeres, G., A combinatorial problem in geometry, ''Compositio Math.'' 2 (1935), 463--470.
* Erdőos P., Szekeres G., On some extremum problems in elementary geometry, Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest. Eötvös Sect. Math. 3-4 (1961), 53–62. Reprinted in: Paul Erdős: The Art of Counting. Selected Writings (J. Spencer, ed.), pp. 680–689, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1973.
* Kalbfleisch J.D., Kalbfleisch J.G., Stanton R.G., A combinatorial problem on convex regions, Proc. Louisiana Conf. Combinatorics, Graph Theory and Computing, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, La, 1970. Congr. Numer. 1 (1970), 180-188.
* Morris, W., and V. Soltan. 2000. The Erdös-Szekeres problem on points in convex position--A survey. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 37(October): 437.
* Morris, W., and V. Soltan. 2000. The Erdös-Szekeres problem on points in convex position--A survey. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 37(October): 437.
*Tóth G., Valtr P., Note on the Erdős-Szekeres theorem, Discrete Comput. Geom. 19 (1998), 457–459.


== External links ==
== External links ==

Revision as of 01:22, 1 September 2005

The Happy Ending problem (so named by Paul Erdős since it led to the marriage of George Szekeres and Esther Klein) is the following statement:

Theorem. Given five points in the plane in general position, it is possible to select four of them that form a convex quadrilateral.

Erdős and Szekeres (1935) proved the following generalisation:

Theorem. Given a positive integer N, there exists a positive integer M such that among any M points in the plane in general position, it is possible to select N of them that form a convex N-gon.

Denoting by f(N) the minimal possible M for which the conclusion holds, it is known that

  • f(3) = 3. This is trivial.
  • f(4) = 5. This was the original problem, proved by Esther Klein.
  • f(5) = 9. According to Erdős and Szekeres (1935), this was first proved by E. Makai; the first published proof appeared in Kalbfleisch et al (1970).
  • f(6) = 17. This has been proved by George Szekeres and Lindsay Peters in work yet to be published. They carried out an exhaustive computer search, essentially examining every possible configuration of 17 points to verify that six of them form a convex hexagon. It is remarkable that Szekeres was writing computer code in Fortran in his mid-nineties to carry out such a project.
  • The value of f(N) is unknown for all N > 6; by the Erdős-Szekeres theorem it is known to be finite.

On the basis of the known values of f(N) for N = 3, 4 and 5, Erdős and Szekeres conjectured in their original paper that

They proved later (Erdős and Szekeres, 1961), by constructing explicit examples, that

but the best known upper bound is only

due to Tóth and Valtr (1998) (see binomial coefficient).

See also

References

  • Erdős, P., Szekeres, G., A combinatorial problem in geometry, Compositio Math. 2 (1935), 463--470.
  • Erdőos P., Szekeres G., On some extremum problems in elementary geometry, Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest. Eötvös Sect. Math. 3-4 (1961), 53–62. Reprinted in: Paul Erdős: The Art of Counting. Selected Writings (J. Spencer, ed.), pp. 680–689, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1973.
  • Kalbfleisch J.D., Kalbfleisch J.G., Stanton R.G., A combinatorial problem on convex regions, Proc. Louisiana Conf. Combinatorics, Graph Theory and Computing, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, La, 1970. Congr. Numer. 1 (1970), 180-188.
  • Morris, W., and V. Soltan. 2000. The Erdös-Szekeres problem on points in convex position--A survey. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 37(October): 437.
  • Tóth G., Valtr P., Note on the Erdős-Szekeres theorem, Discrete Comput. Geom. 19 (1998), 457–459.

Template:Mathstub