User talk:Cached Entity

Hello, Cached Entity! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Regarding reliable sources and editing video games articles at Wikipedia

Hi, Wikipedia relies on verifiable information (WP:V) from reliable sources (WP:RS). In particular, reliable sources generally do not include community or fan sites (including Wikipedia itself), blogs, or simply any other gaming site. Factors of a reliable site would include proof of their editorial accountability and process, their recognized experience and expertise in the industry, etc. For video games, you can refer to a list (still in the making) of reliable game sources at WP:VG/S. Guidelines for appropriate content in a video game article are at WP:VG/GL. If you have questions or suggestions, please raise them up at the appropriate article's (game, policy, or the WikiProject Video games—WP:VG) talk page. Take your time to read through the links and have fun editing at Wikipedia. Jappalang (talk) 11:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Response

You guys are ridiculous. This is going to be the last time I say this. It will be clear, understandable and deliberate.

The information that I AM posting, AGAIN, comes from a DIRECT SOURCE, the people that BUILT the device. It seems to me, that you guys are picking and choosing what you WANT to be considered a source. Under FLORIDA law, and our AMERICAN government, it does not work that way.

You guys posted the rules and the information instructing people on proper content. Now I followed those rules, EXACTLY. No sway, no nothing. The rules were followed very rigidly. Now it seems that you and other "moderators", hastily delete and remove content. However you can never point out why it was removed, nor do you ever include a copy of the content that caused the removal, WITH an explanation of exactly what is wrong with it.

I don't want to hear some cop out excuse about how long/much time it would take to do and so forth. You have the time to remove, the time to send me a message about the removal, so you have plenty of time to include the exact infraction in the message with an explanation. There are a few reasons why this MUST be done.

For one, the most obvious, is to stop malicious, power hungry "Moderators", that delete topics or information that they do not like.

Example: Some people on this Socom Topic don't like the fact that they did NOT make the first online cheat device. They also do not like it being revealed that all of the other devices that came later(one which was his), are all copied source code that the "Majic Team" posted on both their own website and the "Sony Homebrew" website. So people started using the code to make their own. Now THEY want credit for it, claiming they were the first, or "the best". They are not, and I proved it with FACTS.

Second off, some people just don't know the rules. Showing them EXACTLY what the problem is, will help them to add better content.

I am going to forward this message to the true Admin of Wikipedia, as well, if the behaviour continues towards my posted content, then I will contact the offices of Wikipedia/WikiMedia in Saint Petersburg, Florida.

The content I post is WELL within the rules, if it is not, then all you or anyone else has to do, is let me know the EXACT problem with the content and I will correct it.

Now I am going to re-post the content. The content that keeps getting removed, that I post IS valid content. It follows the rules and it is a MAJOR part of the topic at hand.

Now the only problem with what I re-post is that every time my stuff got removed, so did the "Code 9" section. I did not write the "Code 9" section, but I don't want it getting removed because of me. I want to be fair, So I always re-post it with my stuff, even though it was/is a direct competitor of "Code Majic", and was written with the original source code for Code Majic that was given out online and on all the Developer/Homebrew Message Boards. This can be confirmed by the fingerprints left in the source-code posted online. Either way, even with the Code Majic team having negative feelings towards Code 9, and the other devices,I do think it plays a major role in the Saga of Socom.

So please understand, I am willing to work with you guys, and all of the rules. I just am not going to tolerate blanket deletions of the content I post.

If you guys have any issues with the "Code 9" topics, please go ahead and address them. If you want to delete it, then do whatever you want to do. I am not the original writer of the topic, so I am NOT going to edit it, or change it. It is Someone-Else's work and I have no right to touch it.

---

You never sourced the information in the article. The one link you gave after the edit war led to "sorry, no module!" or something of that sort. That is the problem, not your conspiracy fantasies. The Video Game Project will review your unsourched tripe again and again and if nothing changes or is reverted back to the way it was before, this will happen again and again.

- Shane

- Shane —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.131.221.143 (talk) 04:15, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

In Fact...

I went through your contributions. Here is the one link you provided: http://www.thecyndicate.com/CYN-Nuke/modules.php?name=Encyclopedia&op=list_content&eid=2

"Sorry, this Module isn't active!"

All you need to do is give a link that actually backs up what you say. That is all, man. Just do that. Until then, it is unsourced. Even after the Magic stuff is in and sourced, much of the other content that was taken out will stay out.

- Shane —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.131.221.143 (talk) 04:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 06:34, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I, as well as other people should not be made to pay for your ineptitude on the computer. Maybe, oh, I don't know, MAYBE you have to sign up to see the pages? Just a freaking NON-LAZY guess.

But for Lazy, computer illiterate, people such as yourself, I will post a copy of what is on that page, and ask the admins to make it public. So that Information Nazi's that don't know how to operate a computer, and really have no qualifications to moderate ANYTHING on an encyclopedic website, can have instant access to information that everyone already knows about, but wants to somehow turn into a "source", when really there are no "legitimate" sources or real definitions for "legitimate" sources(so that THEY ALONE get to chose what is legitimate or not) can see it with "one click" access, so that it easy on their poor little fingers.

So here you go, a copy of what is on the page,

"Code Majic

Code Majic

In 2003, Work on the first "Next Gen" Cheat Device made for Online Play had already begun. "Code Majic" was undoubtedly the first online cheat device on the scene. It was absolutely the best cheat device out and to this day it remains the best console cheat device ever created. Code Majic is the only cheat device built from the ground up, with completely original source code and original hardware to support the creation of codes for the device. "Idot" was the name of the software programmer and the main inventor of the device itself. Idot spent a lot of his time working very hard on creating his own concept and execution for this device. Time and money were spent on investigating everything people wanted out of a cheat device that they did not have. "Spit" was the name of the main cheat code creator/programmer. Spit spent most of his time tracking down and creating codes for as many games as possible. To this day he is one of, if not THE best code makers out there. "The Cyndicate" was the name of the main Hardware designer. The hardware used allowed staff to tap directly into the PS2 IOP chip and read live memory information from any game, as well as inject any value in real time. No other device in history had this ability on these consoles. This is the first real time code creation on these platforms as well. This allowed the creators to include things in online games that are only normally available in Single Player modes (Glowsticks/H&K OICW in Socom 2), and in some cases, not in the game at all!(PKM, Socom 2). The PKM Heavy Machine Gun is an interesting story. It was originally going to be included in the game, on the single player missions by the computer "terrorists", but the weapon was deemed unfair by game-makers and pulled from the missions at the last second. However, the information about the gun and the 3d model were kept on the disc. This allowed The Code Majic team to create a code to allow players to use this hidden weapon on both the single player missions and online play. People were really very excited about this discovery. Code Majic allowed for ANY value in the game to be edited and the Code Majic team was the sole source for all new codes made for the game. The only other codes were ported from the first Socom. The device went on to make ground breaking cheat menus for "Grand Theft Auto - San Andreas" as well as many other great PS2 games and ALL of the other Socom Games. It is the only device that still currently works on ALL versions of the game. Code Majic was publicly released by team member "The Cyndicate" and shortly thereafter followed by a complete public release by team member and software creator "Idot".

-TheCyndicate.com -1st January 2007"

That information will continue to be deleted because I doubt forcing people to sign up to read the source goes by Wiki standards, and plus I think they need a more credible website than the one you listed. By the way, the information "nazis" at the Video Game Project don't seem to give two shits about this cheat device. They just care about the article. So before you and your buddies CachedEntity and that IP address start throwing conspiracy theories around, attempt to use one percent of your brainpower to maybe say, "Geez, maybe we're doing something wrong."

Hell, read your information. Tell me it does NOT read just like an advertisement. Do I really care about the device? No, I never played SOCOM online and I find people who cheat in any way to be losers. But what I do care about is how absolutely cruddy that article was. Much of that is opinionated, original research, without unbiased and notable links, and without much in the way of explanation.

I know you guys love your device. I assume you worked pretty hard on it. Fact of the matter is however that I couldn't care less. It has to be properly sourced and formatted, which it didn't have either. It has to be done with as little in-universe discussion as possible, which it doesn't do a great job of doing.It has to be written with essential information only- it fails there as well. It is just a cruddy piece. If you work on it and PROPERLY source it, then no one would have a problem. Just because you want to advertise it does not mean it goes by Wiki standards, and just because you can't read the rules of Wikipedia nor have the brain capacity to attempt to follow them doesn't make you right.

You want to play the game of insulting people because, quite frankly, you have no idea what is going on? Go ahead.

- Shane —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.131.221.143 (talk) 19:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Also...

Reading more, I see you think I'm a member of an opposing game device company or project. Pray tell, who am I then? Do you find the fact that someone ventured onto thearticle of a game he played a while ago, saw it was written poorly, got into an edit war, and asked the Video Game Project for help to be so unbelivable? If so, tell me when the aliens abduct you, because your conspiracy theories are at least fun to read.

- Shane —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.131.221.143 (talk) 19:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

You are freaking hilarious. Let me help you out. It is even WORSE if you are NOT involved with the device. It means you come on this site, to make up for your lack of control and social/economic power in real life. You get off on controlling people in this place, because in real life, you get eviscerated. However, you will not succeed. My information is sourced, you were too much of an idiot to figure out how to read the source, now I have been in talks with Wiki in Florida, and I am getting my information added back, and locked. So enjoy losing your power here as well, you sad little man. Cached Entity (talk) 15:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to SOCOM II: U.S. Navy SEALs, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Reorion (talk) 16:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I sited the fucking source. I hear anymore shit from people like you, and I am calling the home office in Florida in accordance with the violation of the ADA Law of 1993(see below).

ADA Regulation for Title III, as printed in the Code of Federal Regulations (7/1/94). The Department of Justice's regulation implementing title III of the ADA, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in "places of public accommodation" (businesses and non-profit agencies that serve the public) and "commercial facilities" (other businesses). The regulation includes Appendix A to Part 36 - Standards for Accessible Design establishing minimum standards for ensuring accessibility when designing and constructing a new facility or altering an existing facility.

Read Wikipedia:No legal threats. You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours. If you return after your block and continue edit warring and making threats of a personal or legal nature, you will be indefinitely blocked. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 21:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

lol, these are not legal threats, but declarations of clarifications on the rules in this place, that is governed by US LAW and FLORIDA LAW. I must announce the law to ensure that it is understood. Maybe you are not intellectually capable of understanding the "legal threats" rule. I did NOT threaten to "Sue" anyone. I told YOU that I would call the home office of WikiPEDIA and inform THEM of YOU not following the rules AND LAWS.

Good God, you people must have zero education.

Cached Entity (talk) 21:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Socom II

Thanks for the heads up. I had that page on my watch list as I used to play it competitively back in the day and I just happened to see a removal of a large amount of information. I will watch the page with more vigilance from now on. --Xander756 (talk) 22:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)