User talk:Mr T (Based)

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Disgaea: Hour of Darkness, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DeluxNate (talk) 16:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Not vandalism. One section is 100% OR, the other is a level list, which is game guide material.Mr T (Based) (talk)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Disgaea: Hour of Darkness. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Redo your edit, except leave Line 79 intact. Don't mass delete. The information is relevant. DeluxNate (talk) 16:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Disagreeing with my edits is fine. Accusing me of vandalism to conceal your disagreemnt is cowardly. Please chekc my edit history. I am not in the habit of vandalising articles. The information is game guide material and original research. I have removed it and will continue to remove such from this encyclopaedia.Mr T (Based) (talk)

Nice burn, and I have no problem with your constructive editing. However if you're unfamiliar with Wikipedia, mass deletion is vandalism, and that is what you are doing to the Episode titles. Please tell me why you don't leave the Episode titles in the articles. Also, please try to spell better. If I'm cowardly, then you must be a world champion speller. DeluxNate (talk) 17:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Shiren the Wanderer

I've reverted your edits to Mystery Dungeon: Shiren the Wanderer because you removed noteworthy information from the article. You are welcome to restore your copyedits, but please do not delete information without a better understanding of the subject. Thanks! Luvcraft (talk) 22:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

It's original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. I have removed and will continue to remove it unless a source is provided.Mr T (Based) (talk)

A source has been provided, but should not be necessary; literally translating words from other languages is not by any means "original research". Luvcraft (talk) 22:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Wrong.Mr T (Based) (talk)

Edits

Hello. While I feel some if not most of your edits to Fire Emblem articles are productive, some seem a little baseless. Remember that references to other games in the series does help to establish context for the reader, and are not merely a matter of redundancy. When written, I aimed to provide info relative to the rest of the series while also informing people who knew nothing about the series. It is simply not pragmatic to reiterate the fundamental gameplay of Fire Emblem for every game article when it can be linked to the series article. If you feel that people shouldn't have to read another article to have a full understanding then that really is just tough, as this forms the basis of wikilinking on Wikipedia. Thanks. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 14:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Follow WP: Consensus. Discuss your views on Talk: Fire Emblem. Until then, your edits will be promptly reverted. I do conceed that references to other games are too frequent, but there shouldn't be a restriction against every reference or link. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 14:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

You don't have a consensus. Neither of us does. So how can I follow it? The consensus is not your view, your view is your view, however much you wish it were otherwise. If you wish to discuss the series, do it on the series' article. Linking to a previous game's article to explain an important section like gameplay, is not good enough. It's lazy, and the constant "Oh, 2 didn't have this, but 3 does, and it was praised in 3 but criticised in 5" type interjections do not belong in the articles, though you could include them (again) on the series' page. Basically, you've decided to edit war because you disagree with my edits.Mr T (Based) (talk)

Consensus is whatever the current state of being is. If there is an edit, and it has not been challenged, then there is consensus to keep it. Your current edits are against consensus. I have conceded that the references to other games were too frequent, and I appreciate some of your edits to limit this. However, a senseless removal of every other game besides the article's is not productive. These are given to provide context to the reader, and usually do not require foreknowledge of the gameplay aspect as an explanation is given. Linking to other articles is not lazy—it is required to prevent a superfluous explanation of the fundamental gameplay aspects of Fire Emblem. It is senseless and redundant to litter each game with "rock-paper-scissors", and "when they die, they're gone for good". It is hypocritical that you accuse of me edit warring when I am retaining consensus and initiating discussion. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 14:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Valkyrie Profile 2: Silmeria, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 14:54, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of "Solium Infernum"

The deletion of an article you created, Solium Infernum, has been proposed for the following reason:

Non-notable yet to be released game. See WP:CRYSTAL.

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 20:05, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Solium Infernum

An article that you have been involved in editing, Solium Infernum, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solium Infernum. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 20:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Wild ARMs

Please stop messing around with the Wild ARMs articles. I'm sure you mean no harm, but that's exactly what a lot of your edits are causing. Removing things solely because you yourself don't understand or agree with them is wrong, as is undoing the corrections to the games' title.Fragments of Jade (talk) 21:41, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm not 'messing around' with the articles. That you disagree with my edits is fine. More to the point, your wholesale reversion has reinstalled OR, POV, poor grammar and English, massive amounts of redundant plot info, overuse of bold and italics, and random capitalisations (quite apart from the ARMs issue you are so impassioned about).Mr T (Based) (talk) 22:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

But you are "messing around". Fixing spelling errors is one thing, but altering the spelling of the title, removing a reference to a game you've never played, and incorrectly altering things could be considered vandalism.Fragments of Jade (talk) 22:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

LOL! I sincerely hope you do try reporting me for vandalism. Please feel free to do so. And you're wrong about me having not played the games. You shouldn't assume things about a person you know nothing about.Mr T (Based) (talk) 22:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)