User talk:83.104.51.181

This ismy talk page and so I have the right to decide what is on this page. Other users who use Wikipedia it is not important for them to know my past edits and if I have done damage. 83.104.51.181 (talk) 06:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

September 2008

1. Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jesper Grønkjær has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Quaeler (talk) 12:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
2. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jesper Grønkjær. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jesper Grønkjær was changed by 83.104.51.181 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-09-05T22:18:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
3. Your recent edit to Semih Aydilek (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 13:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
4. Your recent edit to Semih Aydilek (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 13:36, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Kralizec! (talk) 13:53, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

83.104.51.181 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'd just like to explain my side. All I wanted to do was add links to the article however I was constantly rebuffed by Wikipedia registered users and bots. I tried to appeal no one was having it. I have the correct links and I wish to save the article. Please be fair by blocking me the article is going to get deleted this is completely unfair.

Decline reason:

Oh yes it is, when you explicitly state an intention to resolve differences by edit warring. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

83.104.51.181 (talk) 14:51, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

OK fine I'll use a different IP Address. Fuck you matey.