User talk:Jwy

Please post new messages to the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Please sign all posts with ~~~~. Thank you.

Archives (Index)

2008/December 2008/September 2009/January 2009/February 2009/March 2009/April 2009/May 2009/June 2009/July 2009/August 2009/November 2009/December 2010/January 2010/April 2010/May 2010/June 2010/July 2010/August 2010/September 2010/October 2010/November 2011/January 2011/February 2011/April 2011/July 2011/November 2012/May 2012/July 2012/August 2012/September 2013/September 2013/November 2015/April 2015/July 2015/November 2016/January 2016/February 2016/June 2016/August 2016/November 2017/January 2017/December 2018/October 2018/November 2018/December 2019/July 2019/November 2020/March 2020/November 2021/November 2022/November 2023/November

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Whitman page

I never wrote or posted that. I traced it to here [[1]]. How it got posted under my ID, I have no idea.--Victor9876 (talk) 21:23, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

That link is my correction of the edit that appeared under your name. Maybe it got deleted in your edit window or a WP glitch, but its corrected now. (John User:Jwy talk) 21:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Now you need to put an explantion of the tag on the talk page. I don't need this shit anymore and want away from Wikipedia and it's insane concept. Good luck with article.Victor9876 (talk) 08:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

(I'll put this under this section as it kinda matches) ... the comment was not about you ... it was related to the 2 editors who have been trying to out-urinate each other, and really have become an issue to the project overall. (talk→ Bwilkins / BMW ←track) 16:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Ah, you mean where I recommend that he "also *stay away from* the editors who have tried to help in an overly patient manner"? Seeing as he began to harass Edit Centric, and cavassed me (and probably others) as well, I was trying to get him to stop the harassment. (talk→ Bwilkins / BMW ←track) 16:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Ambiguity resolved. Instead of "stay away from," it could have been interpreted that I should start a RfC or something. (John User:Jwy talk) 16:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure what your point is Jwy. I do know that you came in, became flustered, then semi-requested a 30, arima shows up, you go away, come back, go away, mis-interpret a WQA suggestion, don't protest the move by arima to the article page, move a whole paragraph to another section, leaving the balance to have nothing to do with a "Discussion", only conflicting reports over Whitman's motivations, overturn my naming the section appropriately, and now, a new party has arrived reverting and changing my edits. All over the name Gary Lavergne - CABAL! Let's go to An/I together, just you and I.--Victor9876 (talk) 21:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Rather than doing the two step, let's resolve the Conflict vs Discussion issue. How do you get Discussion out of what is left in the article? There is no discussion involved there. What is there is the Medical Report on Whitman and it's conclusions vs Lavergne's hypothesis. That's all. There is a Conflict in the two, one is Lavergne's opinion in rebuttal of his critics, the other, a Commissioned Panel of experts findings. Conflict not discussion. Please return your assessment of what's there. Thanks!--Victor9876 (talk) 23:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Whitman talk archive

I think I fixed it for now. I extended the archive time to 30 days, mostly because nearly everything archived was part of what was going on now. I had archived the page a few days ago and only left the last 30 days. It may not work right, but I'll address it when it archives again if it doesn't. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

I don't much use the archive bot because I usually am the one who first archives a talk page. Those are slowly growing ones, or ones that I watch all the time and hand archive them when necessary. However, I think you're right and this should do it. We'll see!! Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration on Whitman Page

I would like arbitration on two matters concerning edits of February 27th:

1. Whether Victor9876 is the sole owner of this article, and 2. if the answer to #1 is "no" then I'd like impartial editors to evaluate my edits, compare them to the "undo" by Victor, and determine which is better writing.

If the editors want me to go away, that's o.k. I'd like to contribute what I know about law enforcement, but I don't want to waste my time either. Thanks. Snipercraft (talk) 01:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)