Jump to content

User talk:MrAnderson7: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎HIV test: new section
Line 26: Line 26:


Hi. Could I ask you to stop by [[Talk:HIV test]]? I have several concerns about material which you are repeatedly inserting there. Let's discuss the best way to present the data on false positive results so as not to create an erroneous impression. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 05:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Could I ask you to stop by [[Talk:HIV test]]? I have several concerns about material which you are repeatedly inserting there. Let's discuss the best way to present the data on false positive results so as not to create an erroneous impression. '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]'''&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 05:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

== Copyright issues ==

The edit you made [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HIV_test&diff=282707657&oldid=282557791 in April] to [[HIV test]] was reverted at the time, in part because it clearly added [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrighted]] material to Wikipedia taken from [http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/cjtestfp.htm this website] without confirmed permission from the copyright holder. For [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|legal reasons]], Wikipedia cannot permit editors to add copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted.

I realize that this is "old news", and that the material you added did not comply with [[WP:V|other]] [[WP:DUE|policies]], but I wanted to make sure that you understood that in general you may use [[WP:RS|reliable external websites]] as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences'', or even halves of sentences, or items for a long bulleted list, because Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators are routinely, even aggressively, [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]].

Happy editing, [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 04:53, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:53, 9 May 2009

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, MrAnderson7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 08:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I removed your edit to osteoporosis, hope you understand my reasoning (see link above).

cheers, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 13:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Schauberger

Hi, thanks for your work on the article. The state of the article has annoyed me for years, but it is already much better and the remarkable character as he was truly deserves this. --Benjaminbruheim (talk) 07:47, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HIV test

Hi. Could I ask you to stop by Talk:HIV test? I have several concerns about material which you are repeatedly inserting there. Let's discuss the best way to present the data on false positive results so as not to create an erroneous impression. MastCell Talk 05:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you made in April to HIV test was reverted at the time, in part because it clearly added copyrighted material to Wikipedia taken from this website without confirmed permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot permit editors to add copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted.

I realize that this is "old news", and that the material you added did not comply with other policies, but I wanted to make sure that you understood that in general you may use reliable external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences, or even halves of sentences, or items for a long bulleted list, because Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators are routinely, even aggressively, blocked from editing.

Happy editing, WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:53, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]