Jump to content

Martin Fleischmann: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Conference proceedings: rm unverified link per WP:EL and talk
Abd (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 286702999 by Verbal (talk)rv good-faith edit per Talk.
Line 126: Line 126:
|location=[[Beijing]]
|location=[[Beijing]]
|publisher=[[Tsinghua University]] Press
|publisher=[[Tsinghua University]] Press
|url = http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Fleischmansearchingf.pdf
|url =
|format=
|format=unverified reprint
|isbn=7-302-06489-X}}
|isbn=7-302-06489-X}}
* {{citation |last=Fleischmann |first=Martin
* {{citation |last=Fleischmann |first=Martin

Revision as of 17:25, 11 May 2009

Martin Fleischmann, (born March 29, 1927 in Karlovy Vary, Czechoslovakia) is a British chemist noted for his work in electrochemistry. He came to wider public prominence[1] following his controversial publication of work with colleague Stanley Pons on cold fusion using palladium in the 1980s and '90s.

Life and career

Born in Karlovy Vary, Czechoslovakia, Martin Fleischmann moved to England in 1938 with his family. He received a PhD from Imperial College London in 1950. Fleischmann went on to teach at Durham University. In 1967, aged 40, Fleischmann became Professor of Electrochemistry at the University of Southampton.[2] From 1970 to 1972, he was president of the International Society of Electrochemists.[3] In 1979, he was awarded the medal for electrochemistry and thermodynamics by the Royal Society of London, and in 1986 was elected to the Fellowship of the Royal Society.[4] He retired from teaching in 1983 and was given an honorary professorship at Southampton University.[3] In 1974, he and coworkers were the first to report what was later called Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy.[5] [1]

Around 1983, while they were researchers at the University of Utah, he and Stanley Pons found what they believed a way to create nuclear fusion at room temperatures. Fleischmann wanted to publish it first on an obscure journal, and had already spoken with a team that was doing similar work in a different university for a joint publication.[6][7] The details have not surfaced, but it would seem that the University of Utah wanted to establish priority over the discovery and its patents by making a public announcement before the publication.[6][7] In an interview with 60 Minutes on April 19, 2009, Fleishchmann said that the public announcement was the university's idea, and that he regretted doing it.[8] This decision would later cause heavy criticism against Fleischmann and Pons, being perceived as a breach of how science is usually communicated to other scientists.[7]

On March 23, 1989, it was finally announced at a press conference as "N-Fusion",[citation needed][dubiousdiscuss] which was quickly labeled by the press as cold fusion[citation needed][9] -- a result previously thought to be unattainable. On March 26 Fleischmann warned on the Wall Street Journal Report not to try replications until a published paper was available two weeks later in Journal of electroanalytical chemistry, but that didn't stop hundreds of scientists who had already started work at their laboratories the moment they heard the news on March 23,[10] and more often than not they failed to reproduce the effects.[11] Those who failed to reproduce the claim attacked the pair for fraudulent,[11][12] sloppy[13][11][14] and unethical work,[11] incomplete[13] unreproducible[15] and inaccurate[15] results, and erroneous interpretations.[16] When the paper was finally published, both electrochemists and physicists called it "sloppy" and "uninformative", and it was said that, had Fleischmann and Pons waited for the publication of their paper, most of the trouble would have been avoided because scientists would not have gone so far in trying to test their work.[17][6] Fleischmann and Pons sued an Italian journalist who had published very harsh criticisms against them, but the judge rejected it saying that criticisms were appropriate given the scientists' behaviour, the lack of evidence since the first announcement, and the disinterest of the scientific community, and that they were an expression of the journalist's "right of reporting".[18][19] Fleischmann, Pons and the researchers who replicated the effect remain convinced the effect is real, but the general scientific community remains skeptical.

In 1992, Fleischmann moved to France with Pons to continue their work at the IMRA laboratory (part of Technova Corporation, a subsidiary of Toyota), but in 1995 he retired and returned to Southampton,[20] where he remained as of 1999. Pons stayed at the IMRA lab until its closure in 1998, the project having exhausted a research investment of 12 million pounds.[21]

Fleischmann has more recently co-authored papers with researchers from the U.S. Navy[22][23] and Italian national laboratories (INFN and ENEA),[24] still on the subject of cold fusion.

In March 2006, "Solar Energy Limited" division "D2Fusion Inc" announced in a press release that Fleischmann, then 79, would be acting as their senior scientific advisor.[2]

Peer-reviewed papers

  • Fleischmann, Martin; Pons, Stanley; Anderson, Mark W.; Li, Lian Jun; Hawkins, Marvin (1990), "Calorimetry of the palladium-deuterium-heavy water system", Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 287: 293–348, doi:10.1016/0022-0728(90)80009-U
  • Fleischmann, Martin; Pons, Stanley (1992), "Some Comments on The Paper 'Analysis of Experiments on The Calorimetry of LiOD-D2O Electrochemical Cells,' R.H. Wilson et al., Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Vol. 332, (1992)", Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 332: 33, doi:10.1016/0022-0728(92)80339-6
  • Fleischmann, Martin (1993), "Calorimetry of the Pd-D2O system: from simplicity via complications to simplicity", Physics Letters A, 176 (1–2): 118–129, doi:10.1016/0375-9601(93)90327-V

Conference proceedings

Notes

  1. ^ a b Shelley, Tom (October 2006). "Tiny reflectors boost sensing a billion". Eureka. Retrieved 2007-12-27.
  2. ^ Charles Platt (November 1998). "What If Cold Fusion Is Real?". Wired. p. 2. {{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  3. ^ a b William J. Broad. "Brilliance and Recklessness Seen in Fusion Collaboration". The New York Times. {{cite news}}: Text "date 1989-05-09" ignored (help)
  4. ^ "Fellows of the Royal Society" (pdf). The Royal Society. August 2008. Retrieved 17-02-2009. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  5. ^ Fleischmann, M. (15 May 1974). "Raman Spectra of Pyridine Adsorbed at a Silver Electrode". Chemical Physics Letters. 26 (2): 163–166. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(74)85388-1. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  6. ^ a b c Shamoo, 2003, 86
  7. ^ a b c Simon, 2002, 28-36
  8. ^ Cold Fusion is Hot Again, CBS News http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/04/17/60minutes/main4952167_page4.shtml
  9. ^ Fleischmann, Martin; Pons, Stanley; Hawkins, M. (1989), "Electrochemically induced nuclear fusion of deuterium", Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 261 (2A): 301–308, doi:10.1016/0022-0728(89)80006-3, and errata in Vol. 263.
  10. ^ Simon, 2002, page 35
  11. ^ a b c d Shamoo, 2003, pages 76, 97
  12. ^ Henry Krips, J. E. McGuire, Trevor Melia (1995). University of Pittsburgh Press (ed.). Science, Reason, and Rhetoric (illustrated ed.). Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. xvi. ISBN 0822939126.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ^ a b Simon, 2002, p. 119
  14. ^ Michael B. Schiffer, Kacy L. Hollenback, Carrie L. Bell (2003). University of California Press (ed.). Draw the Lightning Down: Benjamin Franklin and Electrical Technology in the Age of Enlightenment (illustrated ed.). Berkeley, Calif.: Univ. of California Press. pp. 207. ISBN 0520238028.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. ^ a b Taubes, Gary (1993). Bad science: the short life and weird times of cold fusion. New York: Random House. p. 6. ISBN 0-394-58456-2.
  16. ^ Thomas F. Gieryn (1999). University of Chicago Press (ed.). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line (illustrated ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. http://books.google.com/books?id=GljD3CHbDx0C&pg=PA204 204]. ISBN 0226292622.
  17. ^ Simon, 2002, [1]
  18. ^ Simon, 2002, pags. 110-112
  19. ^ Robert L. Park (2002). Oxford University Press (ed.). Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud (reprint ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 123–124. ISBN 0198604432.
  20. ^ Simon, 2002, p. 137
  21. ^ Voss, David, What Ever Happened to Cold Fusion, Physics World, March 1, 1999, retrieved May 1, 2008 from: http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/1258
  22. ^ Szpak, S., et al., Thermal behavior of polarized Pd/D electrodes prepared by co-deposition. Thermochim. Acta, 2004. 410: p. 101.
  23. ^ Mosier-Boss, P.A. and M. Fleischmann, Thermal and Nuclear Aspects of the Pd/D2O System, ed. S. Szpak and P.A. Mosier-Boss. Vol. 2. Simulation of the Electrochemical Cell (ICARUS) Calorimetry. 2002: SPAWAR Systems Center, San Diego, U.S. Navy.
  24. ^ Del Giudice, E., et al. Loading of H(D) in a Pd lattice. in The 9th International Conference on Cold Fusion, Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. 2002. Tsinghua Univ., Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press

References