Jump to content

User talk:80.41.42.73: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 292102719 by ClueBot (talk) And another
→‎May 2009: Please stop archving.
Line 2: Line 2:


I am currently manually archiving parts of the [[WP:RD|reference desks]]. Cluebot mistakes this for vandalism of the blanking variety. Hence why you might see Cluebot warnings on this page. [[Special:Contributions/80.41.42.73|80.41.42.73]] ([[User talk:80.41.42.73#top|talk]]) 22:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
I am currently manually archiving parts of the [[WP:RD|reference desks]]. Cluebot mistakes this for vandalism of the blanking variety. Hence why you might see Cluebot warnings on this page. [[Special:Contributions/80.41.42.73|80.41.42.73]] ([[User talk:80.41.42.73#top|talk]]) 22:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

:Please stop your archiving. There is a [[WP:BOT|bot]] that is doing a perfectly satisfactory job of this; by contrast, for example, you munged [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Computing/May_2009&diff=prev&oldid=292102992 this attempt to create a table of contents]. And even if you ''were'' doing archiving perfectly, Wikipedia would be better off if you spent your time working on improving articles. If you're looking for something useful to do, please see [[WP:MAINT]], for example. -- <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">[[User:John Broughton|John Broughton]] </font> [[User talk:John Broughton |(♫♫)]] 00:45, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:45, 25 May 2009

May 2009

I am currently manually archiving parts of the reference desks. Cluebot mistakes this for vandalism of the blanking variety. Hence why you might see Cluebot warnings on this page. 80.41.42.73 (talk) 22:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your archiving. There is a bot that is doing a perfectly satisfactory job of this; by contrast, for example, you munged this attempt to create a table of contents. And even if you were doing archiving perfectly, Wikipedia would be better off if you spent your time working on improving articles. If you're looking for something useful to do, please see WP:MAINT, for example. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 00:45, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]