Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birchview Elementary School (Plymouth, Minnesota): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BlankVerse (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:
:::: In other words, "yes". School articles have a unique set of standards. [[User:Pete.Hurd|Pete.Hurd]] 17:47, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
:::: In other words, "yes". School articles have a unique set of standards. [[User:Pete.Hurd|Pete.Hurd]] 17:47, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. [[User:BlankVerse|<sup><font color="green">''Blank''</font></sup>]][[User talk:BlankVerse|<sup><font color="#F88017">''Verse''</font></sup>]] 18:24, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. [[User:BlankVerse|<sup><font color="green">''Blank''</font></sup>]][[User talk:BlankVerse|<sup><font color="#F88017">''Verse''</font></sup>]] 18:24, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' and '''Delete''', this school is below the threshold established at WP:SCH.[[User:Gateman1997|Gateman1997]] 19:06, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:06, 29 November 2005

NN ankle biter farm, article far below WP standards Pete.Hurd 02:37, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is a hoax, no indication of the putative school's location, the write-up suggests the editor intends the article to be humourous, ironic, or some such thing. School cannot be verified. Recommend delete Pete.Hurd 02:39, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and possibly contact the administration of Wayzata High School in Marion, Minnesota per the anonymous user's history. This is a high school student so it's not appropriate to repeat here, but I think you'll find the vandal's name. Durova 05:03, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: hoax? "putative school"? "cannot be verified"? When I did a Google search on the term "Birchview", this school in Plymouth, MN was the third item on the search result. See this. The article isn't much, but to call the author a vandal is a huge stretch. Please assume good faith and don't bite the newbies! -- DS1953 06:06, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Durova's "vandal" comment may refer to vandalism to Natural selection which was comitted by the same IP as the creator of this article. I found this article by checking up the contributions of that IP after reverting that vandalism. Enough time passed between the two events that I would not necessarily assume they were by the same person. Pete.Hurd 07:53, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Check the page history at Wayzata High School, which was altered from the same IP address on the same day this article was created. Especially note the text inserted and the comment by the person who cleaned up afterward. Durova 08:45, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I was not aware that it was WP policy to keep all school articles. Can you point me to this? Pete.Hurd 15:59, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please read the article I nominated [1] and tell me again why you think such a thing should not be nominated for AfD! Pete.Hurd 16:31, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
{sofixit}. List it for cleanup at Schoolwatch. Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:51, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
So all school articles belong to a magical subset of articles in which no lower bounds of quality exist? They can never be bad enough to merit deletion? All that verbiage about "don't take it personally" and how AfD is a constructive process in the AfD literature just doesn't apply to the magical category of schools? I'm not going to {sofixit}, I spend far too much time working on topics of actual encyclopedic value as it is. Pete.Hurd 17:00, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep Hipocrite - «Talk» 17:11, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
In other words, "yes". School articles have a unique set of standards. Pete.Hurd 17:47, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]