User talk:AndreaCarax: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:33, 20 June 2009

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, AndreaCarax, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! DiverseMentality^(Boo!) 20:29, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I Were A Boy

Please do not change the genre. The genre was dicussed by users. Just because Beyonce is a R&B singer it doesn't make the song R&B. Many artists record songs outside their genres. Thank you. Charmed36 (talk) 19:21, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Charmed36. Please do not change the genre of the song. This song is more further from R&B than any song Beyonce has ever done. Orane (talk) 21:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Keri Hilson, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 18:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

Please do not remove genres from genre fields without explaining your actions, such as leaving an edit summary. Before adding or removing genres, please discuss them on the talk page in order to avoid conflicts. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 22:27, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

STOP CHANGING THE GENRE of music please! you do not help Wikipedia in any way like this! (MariAna Mimi 20:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC))

June 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on In a Perfect World.... Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Σ xplicit 20:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at In a Perfect World.... Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. So Why 20:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 == June 2009 ==
 [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{#if:In a Perfect World...|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:In a Perfect World...]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If necessary, pursue [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> — '''''[[User:Explicit|<font color="000000">Σ</font>]][[User talk:Explicit|<font color="000000">xplicit</font>]]''''' 20:24, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
+<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]]  You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for {{#if:24 hours|a period of '''24 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for violating the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]{{#if:In a Perfect World...|&#32;at [[:In a Perfect World...]]}}. Please be more careful to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] rather than engaging in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. {{#if:yes|'''[[User:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #AC0000">So</span>]][[User talk:SoWhy|<span style="font-variant:small-caps; color: #35628F">Why</span>]]''' 20:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block -->