Montana Meth Project: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 64.175.135.244 (talk) to last version by ClueBot |
Antoine1786 (talk | contribs) Edited for clarity and provided more evidence. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Montana Meth Project''' (MMP) is a [[Montana]]-based organization founded by [[Thomas Siebel]] which seeks to reduce [[methamphetamine]] abuse, particularly among [[teenager]]s. The main venture of the MMP is a saturation-level [[advertising campaign]] of [[television]], [[radio]], and [[print ad]]s which graphically depict the consequences of [[methamphetamine]] use. Common elements are the deterioration of each teenage subject's health and living conditions, [[amphetamine psychosis]], moral compromise, and regret. |
|||
[[Image:Montana Meth Project mural - Drummond Montana.jpg|thumb|300px|Community-painted anti-meth mural in [[Drummond, Montana]]]] |
|||
The '''Montana Meth Project''' (MMP) is a [[Montana]]-based organization founded by [[billionaire]] [[Thomas Siebel]] which seeks to reduce [[methamphetamine]] abuse, particularly among [[teenager]]s. The main venture of the MMP is a saturation-level [[advertising campaign]] of [[television]], [[radio]], and [[print ad]]s which graphically depict the consequences of [[methamphetamine]] use. Common elements are the deterioration of each teenage subject's health and living conditions, [[amphetamine psychosis]], moral compromise, and regret. The effectiveness of the campaign at reducing methamphetamine use is disputed.<ref name=disputed>[http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081211081444.htm Success of Anti-Meth Ads Disputed.] Science Daily. December 11, 2008.</ref><ref name=disputed2>[http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTRE4BI5S620081219 Benefits of Anti-meth Ads Questioned]. Reuters, December 19, 2008</ref> |
|||
==Effectiveness of the |
==Effectiveness of the Campaign== |
||
According to a 2007 Montana State Office of Public Instruction Report,<ref name==pushing>[https://www.montanameth.org/documents/YRBS_Report.pdf Montana State Office of Public Instruction Report]</ref> since the inception of the program in 2005, there has also been a 72% relative decrease in adult methamphetamine use, and a 62% relative decline in methamphetamine-related crimes.<ref name=factsheet>[http://www.methproject.org/documents/Meth%20Project%20Fact%20Sheet%206-16-2008.pdf The Meth Project Fact Sheet]</ref>. In april 2007, the Associated Press reported that state and community efforts aimed at curbing the methamphetamine problem, have helped to increase law enforcement efforts." Montana's Attorney General released a report , which credits the program with helping change attitudes about |
|||
Two surveys have been conducted that have investigated methamphetamine use amongst teenagers in Montana before and after the launch of the Meth Project's ads.<ref name=Statement>[http://cid-974589a371c91aaa.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/Blog%20Documents/Montana%20Meth.Erceg-Hurn.pdf Statement of David Erceg-Hurn to Governor Schweitzer and Montana Legislature regarding funding of Montana Meth Project in 2009 budget]</ref> The first survey is the CDC's youth risk behavior survey (YBRS). The YRBS data are listed below. |
|||
meth - and cites a survey in which 93 percent of Montana students considered meth a "great risk." The April 2007 report, Methamphetamine in Montana: A Follow-up on Trends and Progress <ref>[http://www.methproject.org/documents/MT_AG_Report_Final.pdf - Methamphetamine in Montana: A Follow-up on Trends and Progress] </ref> describes the impact the Meth Project has had on methamphetamine use in montana, in addition to law enforcement efforts. |
|||
==Government recognition and expansion== |
|||
YRBS Data - Percentage of Montana Teens who have EVER used meth:<ref name=Statement></ref> |
|||
The MMP was cited by the White House as a "model for the nation."<ref>[http://www.montanameth.org/documents/Montana%20Meth%20Project%20ONDCP%20Release%20FINAL.PDF Press Release - White House Cites Montana Meth Project as Model For The Nation]</ref>. In June of 2007, the FBI recognized Montana Meth Project creator Thomas Siebel with the Director's Community Leadership Award. Special Agent in Charge Timothy Fuhrman, of the Salt Lake City FBI field office, praised Siebel for making "a real difference in the lives of the people of Montana and across the country." <ref>[http://www.methproject.org/documents/06-06-07_Great_Falls_Tribune.pdf Press Release - FBI honors Siebel for Meth Project Work]</ref>. As of mid 2009, the campaign has expanded to include [[Arizona]], [[Colorado]], [[Hawaii]], [[Idaho]], [[Illinois]], and [[Wyoming]]. |
|||
{| class="wikitable" border="1" |
|||
|- |
|||
! 1999 |
|||
! 2001 |
|||
! 2003 |
|||
! 2005 |
|||
! 2007 |
|||
|- |
|||
| 13.5% |
|||
| 12.6% |
|||
| 9.3% |
|||
| 8.3% |
|||
| 4.6% |
|||
|- |
|||
|} |
|||
The YRBS data indicates that teenage meth use in Montana has declined since the Meth Project’s ad campaign was launched in 2005. However the YRBS data also shows that meth use was dropping for at least 6 years prior to the launch of the ad campaign. The absolute drop in meth use since the ad campaign was introduced in 2005 is 3.7%. Similar absolute drops in meth use occurred in some years prior to the introduction of the ad campaign. For example, meth use fell by 3.3% between 2001 and 2003.<ref name=Statement></ref> |
|||
The other survey of teen meth use has been conducted by the Meth Project.<ref name=Statement></ref> The figures from the Meth Project's survey are listed below. |
|||
{| class="wikitable" border="1" |
|||
|- |
|||
! 2005 |
|||
! 2006 |
|||
! 2007 |
|||
! 2008 |
|||
|- |
|||
| 2% |
|||
| 6% |
|||
| 4% |
|||
| 3% |
|||
|- |
|||
|} |
|||
According to the MMP's figures, before the ad campaign (2005), only 2% of teenagers had ever used meth. Six months after the launch of the ad campaign (2006), 6% reported using meth. In contrast to the YRBS data, the MMP's figures indicate that the percentage of teenagers using meth in Montana increased following the launch of the ad campaign. By 2008, 3% of teenagers reported using meth, still more than before the ad campaign commenced. |
|||
In press materials, the Meth Project commonly cites YRBS figure of a 45% decrease in meth use between 2005 and 2007. However the ''absolute'' drop for the period was 3.7%. In contrast, the Meth Project's own data for the same period show a 2% ''absolute increase'' in meth use, or a ''100% relative increase''.<ref name=Statement></ref> |
|||
According to a 2007 Montana State Office of Public Instruction Report,<ref name==pushing>[https://www.montanameth.org/documents/YRBS_Report.pdf Montana State Office of Public Instruction Report]</ref> since the inception of the program in 2005, there has also been a 72% relative decrease in adult methamphetamine use, and a 62% relative decline in methamphetamine-related crimes.<ref name=factsheet>[http://www.methproject.org/documents/Meth%20Project%20Fact%20Sheet%206-16-2008.pdf The Meth Project Fact Sheet]</ref>. |
|||
===Office of National Drug Control Policy report=== |
|||
In November 2006, the [[Office of National Drug Control Policy]] (ONDCP) published a report, ''Pushing Back Against Meth: A Progress Report on the Fight'',<ref name=pushing>[http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/pdf/pushingback_against_meth.pdf Pushing Back Against Meth: A Progress Report on the Fight]</ref> highlighting the impact of recently enacted State and Federal laws, such as the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act (CMEA) of 2005, that restricted transactions for the [[over the counter drug]]s that can be used to manufacture methamphetamine. Based on the results of [[Quest Diagnostics]]' preliminary review of workplace drug tests conducted during the first five months of 2006, the nationwide adult usage of meth declined by 12% when compared to the same period in 2005. Quest provided state-level results: on the state level, results varied according to the strictness and duration of the states' laws. "Montana’s methamphetamine precursor law went into effect July 1st 2005. The Montana law is stricter than the CMEA in several important respects."<ref name=pushing /> Montana’s workplace drug testing results showed a 69.4% decrease in positive tests for amphetamine. Montana's Attorney General <ref>[http://www.doj.mt.gov/news/releases2007/20070124preliminarymethreport.pdf Methamphetamine in Montana: A Preliminary Report on Trends and Impact]. January, 2007.</ref><ref>[http://www.doj.mt.gov/news/releases2008/20080331report.pdf Methamphetamine in Montana A Follow-up Report on Trends and Progress]. April, 2008.</ref> and the MMP<ref name=factsheet /> attribute Montana's decrease in adult meth usage to the MMP. However, the ONDC reported: "The primary reason for this positive trend is the enactment of various State laws...which implemented restrictions on transactions involving products containing certain chemicals (primarily, ephedrine and pseudoephedrine) that can be used to make methamphetamine."<ref name=pushing /> |
|||
===Prevention Science critical review=== |
|||
A critical review of the Montana Meth Project's advertising campaign was published in the peer-review journal ''Prevention Science''<ref>[http://www.springerlink.com/content/t3575m0w40653lh7 Drugs, Money, and Graphic Ads: A Critical Review of the Montana Meth Project]. David M. Erceg-Hurn, ''Prevention Science''; August 7, 2008</ref> in December 2008. The review examined the Meth Project's statistical methodology and data reporting. The review found that the Meth Project had selectively reported their research findings, focusing on unrepresentative positive findings and ignoring data suggesting that the campaign may be associated with harmful outcomes. The review found that the Meth Project's data suggests that exposure to the graphic ads may lead to an ''increase'' in the percentage of teenagers who believe that taking meth is socially acceptable and ''not'' dangerous. Such 'boomerang' effects in response to persuasive, graphic ads are not uncommon, and are predicted by the theory of [[psychological reactance]]. |
|||
The critical review found that the selective reporting of results by the Meth Project has led the media, politicians and the public to form distorted and inaccurate beliefs about the campaign's effectiveness. The public believes that the ad campaign is far more effective than the Meth Project's research findings indicate. The main recommendation of the review was that public funding and additional 'roll-outs' of the program should cease until its effectiveness can be scientifically examined. The review concluded: "Politicians, the media, and prevention researchers also need to ensure that in future they critically evaluate any research released by the MMP, rather than assuming the organization’s press releases (and reports) are presenting data in a fair and balanced way. It is recommended that any future reports documenting the results of MMP’s use and attitudes surveys include complete statistical analyses for every question in the survey. This is because researchers and policymakers making decisions about MMP-style graphic advertising campaigns need access to all evidence, rather than a subset of findings that portray the MMP in a positive light.”<ref>Erceg-Hurn</ref> |
|||
The critical review attracted considerable press coverage in December 2008. As a result, the Governor of Montana, Brian Schweitzer, announced that he would review public funding for the Meth Project in early 2009.<ref name=Governor>[http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/governor_wants_more_information_on_meth_project_study/7307/ Governor wants more info on Meth Project study]. Associated Press, December 19, 2008 (originally [http://www.montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp?S=9555980&nav=menu227_7 here])</ref><ref name=Governor2>[http://www.greatfallstribune.com/article/20081220/NEWS01/81220012 Meth Project Study Author Declines Governor's Visit], Matt Gouras (Associated Press), Great Falls Tribune, December 20, 2008</ref> |
|||
==Government funding and expansion== |
|||
Many in the Montana state legislature hailed the project as an unprecedented success, and moved to fund the previously privately-funded project with tax dollars.<ref name=missoula>[http://missoulanews.com/index.cfm?CFID=1632273&CFTOKEN=32847826&do=article.details&id=0609F40B-2BF4-55D0-F1FBC76356A23DD7 An expensive habit: State pledges $2 million to Montana Meth Project], ''[[Missoula Independent]]'', 04/19/2007</ref> The move to provide public funding for the Meth Project was opposed by some legislators and drug prevention and treatment professionals, who asserted that the Meth Project's effectiveness is unproven and that research shows that these type of media campaigns are ineffective.<ref name=missoula /> |
|||
The MMP was cited by the Bush Administration as a "model for the nation."<ref>[http://www.montanameth.org/documents/Montana%20Meth%20Project%20ONDCP%20Release%20FINAL.PDF Press Release - White House Cites Montana Meth Project as Model For The Nation]</ref> As of 2008, the campaign has expanded to include [[Arizona]], [[Idaho]], [[Illinois]], and [[Wyoming]]. |
|||
The Governor of Montana, Brian Schweitzer, announced that he would review public funding for the Meth Project in early 2009, as a result of a critical review of the Meth Project published in an academic journal, which called for public funding of the Meth Project to be put on hold.<ref name=Governor></ref> |
|||
In February 2009, the Montana legislature came under increased pressure to withdraw funding to the Meth Project after an analysis of Meth Project tax forms revealed that the Project spends large amounts of money on staff salaires and website costs. Since the Project started to attract public funding, Meth Project Director Peg Shea's salary has increased from $31,184 to $131,000 a year, more than any elected Montana official. <ref>[http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2009/02/12/should-the-montana-meth-project-receive-state-funding-in-difficult-financial-times Should the Meth Project receive state funding in tough financial times?], ''[[Intelligent Discontent]]'', Feb 12, 2009</ref> |
|||
In May 2009, Governor Schweitzer cut the Montana Meth Project's budget for 2009-10 by $500,000 and stated that the Project would have to become "self supporting" in the future.<ref name=cut>[http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/veto_pen_schweitzer_cuts_some_meth_project_funding_and_welcome_home_program/10414/ Schweitzer uses Veto Pen - Cut some Montana Meth Funding, Flathead Beacon, 14 May 2009]</ref>. The Project was still granted $500,000 for the next budget period. |
|||
===March Against Meth=== |
|||
The March Against Meth was a demonstration and rally in Helena, Montana on February 16, 2009. Over 2,300 students of all ages from across Montana marched from Helena High School to the Capitol where they delivered over 55,000 signatures of Montanans requesting funding from the Montana legislature for the project. It was the largest youth demonstration in Montana's history. The Meth Project and its supporters requested $2 million dollars in state funding to continue to bring the "Not Even Once" message to Montana teens.<ref>[http://www.methproject.org/documents/Montana%20Meth%20Project%20MAM%20Release.pdf Montana Meth Project MAM Release], Montana Meth Project</ref><ref>[http://www.methproject.org/documents/Helena%20IR%2021609.pdf Helena IR 21609], Montana Meth Project</ref> |
|||
The March was criticized by some Montanans, who suggested some teenagers were lured to attend due to free giveaways of ipods and the presence of a blackhawk helicopter.<ref name=rally1>[http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/12/31/more-scientific-thinking-from-the-montana-meth-project More Scientific Thinking from the Montana Meth Project], Intelligent Discontent, January 1, 2009</ref><ref name=rally2>[http://electriccityweblog.com/?m=20090101 Montana Meth - Electric City Weblog], January 1, 2009</ref> The Montana media were also criticized for preannouncing the rally as a success before it had even taken place.<ref name=rally3>[http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2009/02/16/more-montana-meth-pr-before-the-rally-the-gazette-pre-announces-a-successful-rally/ More Montana Meth PR Before the Rally: The Gazette Pre-Announces a Successful Rally!], Intelligent Discontent, February 16, 2009</ref> |
|||
==Television ads== |
|||
All 15 [[television]] spots were conceived by [[San Francisco]]-based advertising agency Venables Bell & Partners. The 2005 and 2006 spots were directed by [[Tony Kaye (director)|Tony Kaye]], the 2007 spots by [[Darren Aronofsky]], and the 2008 spots by [[Alejandro González Iñárritu]]. |
|||
===2005-2006: Directed by Tony Kaye=== |
|||
[[Tony Kaye (director)|Tony Kaye]]'s spots feature themes of meth-addicted teens' moral compromises and regret, and certain teens' false confidence that they can use meth without becoming addicted. ''Bathtub'', ''Laundromat'' and ''Everything Else'' feature pre-addicted teens encountering future, addicted versions of themselves. ''Just Once'', ''That Guy'' and ''Junkie Den'' feature teens who promise themselves that they will only try meth "once". ''Crash'' and ''Jumped'' feature teens who wish that a terrible accident or violent attack would have prevented them from trying meth, since they consider their addiction to be a worse fate. |
|||
====Wave I==== |
|||
* '''Bathtub''' - A teenage girl in her bathrobe talks on her cell phone while looking into her bathroom mirror. She says, "yeah, my parents think I'm sleeping at your house". She hangs up and gets into the shower. While showering, she looks down and sees a trickle of blood. She turns around and screams; there is a pockmarked, bleeding version of herself shivering at the bottom of the shower, who pleads, "don't do it." |
|||
* '''Laundromat''' - A deranged, addicted young man runs into a laundromat and demands the money of everyone inside, beating a man to the floor and screaming in the faces of women and children. He then runs to a young man in the corner, grabs him by the collar, and shouts "this wasn't supposed to be your life!" The assailant and his last victim are the same young man. |
|||
* '''Just Once''' - A teen girl declares that she is only trying meth "once", leading to a sequence of further [[compromise]]s to support her addiction, including [[theft|stealing]] and [[prostitution]], each of which she promises will be "just once." The ad ends with the girl unconscious on her bed in a meth-induced haze, while her [[pre-teen]] sister steals her meth and whispers, "I'm going to try meth, just once." |
|||
* '''That Guy''' - A teen boy states "I'm going to try meth just once, I'm not gonna be like that guy." He gestures towards a later version of himself, who deteriorates further, finally ending up shaking and sweating on a [[drug dealer]]'s makeshift van-seat "couch". A teen girl purchases from the dealer, saying "I'm gonna try meth just once, I'm not gonna be like that guy," indicating the now-wretched boy. |
|||
====Wave II==== |
|||
* '''Junkie Den''' - In a shadowy drug den, a young boy tries meth for the first time. He is congratulated by dirty, [[drug-addicted]] people, who describe his future life as "one of us". One woman says that they will "shoot up together", two addicted men say that they and the boy will "steal together... and we'll be [[sleep together|sleepin' together]], too." The boy's protest that he is only trying it once is met with howls of laughter. |
|||
* '''Crash''' - A car is driving in the rain at night. The tire explodes, and the car flips over. In narration, the teenage driver wishes that she had crashed on her way to "that party", even if she were to have broken her neck and become [[paralysis|paralyzed]], because it would have prevented her from trying meth. The girl, now addicted, smokes the drug in a dirty, run-down apartment, in which she says "now this is my life." |
|||
* '''Everything Else''' - A girl approaches a group of people who are smoking meth, and requests some for herself. The dealer gives her the drug, as well as "everything else" that comes with it. He aggressively saddles her with an intimidating drug dealer, "meth boyfriends" who [[rape]] her, an [[addicted baby]], and in a mirror, he shows her her bleeding "meth face." |
|||
* '''Jumped''' - A younger teen boy is chased through a parking lot by three older males, who beat him to the ground and kick him. In narration, the boy wishes he had been assaulted that night, because then he would not have tried meth. The worst of the three assailants raises a [[cinder block]] high over his head, threatening to drop it on the boy and crush his skull. The camera cuts to a drug den, where the boy, shaking, says "now all I do is meth." |
|||
===2007: Directed by Darren Aronofsky=== |
|||
Each of the spots directed by [[Darren Aronofsky]] features a voice-over spoken by the teen featured in the spot. In voice-over, each teen talks about how strong their relationships are with their friends and family, and how important those relationships are to them. The action on screen demonstrates that if a person becomes addicted to meth, their addiction will destroy even their strongest relationships. |
|||
====Wave III==== |
|||
* '''Boyfriend''' - A teen girl lies on a bed in her underwear, as an older man zips up his pants and walks out the door of the motel room in which the girl lies. In narration, the girl states, "I love my [[boyfriend]], we've been together since like 8th grade. He takes care of me." As the older man exits, he hands something (presumably a bag of meth) to the girl's boyfriend, who stands outside of the door. The boyfriend enters the room and inspects the bag of meth that the man gave him, as the girl cringes and weeps. |
|||
* '''Mother''' - A teenage boy raids his mother's purse for money, while in narration, he talks about how much he loves her. When she enters the room and objects to his [[theft]], both dismayed and concerned for her son, he strikes her to the floor. She cries out to him, hanging onto his leg. He kicks free and flees, as she lies sobbing on the floor. |
|||
* '''Friends''' - From the interior of a car, we see one worried passenger, the reckless driver, and a second worried passenger. A female narrator says that she is "tight with her friends", who "always look out for me". The narrator is revealed to be the fourth person in the car—she is slumped in the backseat—as the car halts in front of a hospital [[emergency room]]. The girl's 'friends' pull her [[unconscious|unresponsive]] body out of the car, dump her next to the curb, and speed off as a nurse approaches the girl. |
|||
* '''Parents''' - An upset teenage boy approaches his parents' house, knocking on the door, and shouting "I'm sorry, Dad!" In a narration, the boy talks about how he's always been really close with his parents. Inside the house, the parents are panicked and distraught, and turn off the light. The boy kicks the door many times, begging to be let in, screaming that he's going to kill them. |
|||
===2008: Directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu=== |
|||
Each of the spots by [[Alejandro González Iñárritu]] features a teen or teens who appear to be normal and healthy in the beginning of the spot, but who appear pockmarked, bleeding, and addicted at the end, despite the fact that time passes normally. As each teen encounters their downfall—prostitution, robbery, or overdose—a narrator intones the simple phrase: ''"This isn't normal... but on meth, it is."'' |
|||
====Wave IV==== |
|||
* '''Family''' - Three smiling, clean-cut teen boys ring the doorbell of a family's house. A mother opens the door, and the boys violently burst into the house: one pins the mother against the wall by her throat, another grabs a vase and smashes it over the father's head. The boys scatter through the house and quickly fill their arms with valuables, one boy shrieks "Hurry up!!", while a female voice-over says, "This isn't normal..." The family's young daughter enters the room, crying for her father who is injured on the floor, and one of the boys stands over her and shouts until she drops to the floor in terror. As the boys flee the house with their arms full of valuables, we see that their formerly clean-cut faces are now gaunt, pockmarked and bleeding, as the voice-over concludes, "... but on meth, it is." |
|||
* '''O.D.''' - Several clean-cut, smiling teens are sitting on a bed in a clean, sunny, suburban teenager's room, watching a lighthearted show on television. The camera pans to the floor, where one clean-cut teenage boy is gasping, sweating, and convulsing, with his eyes rolled back into his head. The teens on the bed appear not to notice him. The voice-over intones, "This isn't normal..." as the camera pans to a mirror near the floor where the boy lays. The camera passes through the mirror and enters the dim, shadowy "mirror world" as a low, ominous tone overtakes the sound of the television. The camera pans upward past the now-pockmarked face of the seizing boy, rising above the filthy floor to the grimy bed where the group of teens sit, now gaunt and sickly. The teens on the bed take no notice of the overdosing boy, because they too are high on meth. One shaking teen passes a meth pipe to another, while the voice over concludes "... but on meth, it is." |
|||
* '''Sisters''' - Two clean-cut teen girls approach three men in their 30s drinking beer next to a gas station. The older teen, appearing about 15, hesitantly propositions them: "Hey, guys... you can do anything you want to me, for fifty bucks." There is a pause. One of the men gestures to the younger, middle-school-aged girl, who looks frightened, and the man says, "Well, what about her?" The older teen looks aside, her face blank, and says, "Sure." A female voice-over says, "This isn't normal...", as the man who spoke pushes open the bathroom door. The camera cuts to the interior of the filthy bathroom as they enter. The girls' faces are now pocked and bleeding. The camera pans to the dirty bathroom mirror. We see the reflection of the mute, younger girl, standing terrified in the corner, as the man who requested her removes his coat. The other man reaches up to pull back the older girl's hair, as the voice-over says, "... but on meth, it is." |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
{{reflist|2}} |
{{reflist|2}} |
||
[http://www.methproject.org/documents/MT_AG_Report_Final.pdf - Methamphetamine in Montana: A Follow-up on Trends and Progress] |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
| Line 115: | Line 18: | ||
===Press=== |
===Press=== |
||
*[http://www.helenair.com/articles/2009/04/21/local/85lo_090421_methmarch.txt State's Largest Demonstration Captured in Meth Project Documentary] ''Helena Independent Record'', April 21, 2009 |
*[http://www.helenair.com/articles/2009/04/21/local/85lo_090421_methmarch.txt State's Largest Demonstration Captured in Meth Project Documentary] ''Helena Independent Record'', April 21, 2009 |
||
*[http://www.methproject.org/documents/06-06-07_Great_Falls_Tribune.pdf FBI Honors Siebel for Meth Project Work] "Great Falls Tribune", June 6, 2007 |
|||
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7576275.stm Montana meth ads winning drug battle] "BBC News", August 22, 2008 |
|||
*[http://www.parents.com/teens-tweens/communication/talking-to-kids/getting-real-about-meth Getting Real About Meth] "Family Circle", February 2009 |
|||
*[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/05/us/05meth.html?_r=2 Societal Cost of Meth Use Is Gauged in New Study] "New York Times", February 4, 2009 |
|||
*[http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11293880 The Montana Meth Project Shock tactics] "Economist.com", May 1, 2008 |
|||
Graphic ads have reversed a trend |
|||
* [http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2009/02/12/should-the-montana-meth-project-receive-state-funding-in-difficult-financial-times/ Should the Montana Meth Project receive state funding in difficult financial times]. ''Intelligent Discontent'', February 12, 2009 |
|||
* [http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTRE4BI5S620081219 Benefits of graphic anti-meth ads questioned]. ''Reuters'', December 19, 2008 |
|||
* [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/11/AR2008121101432.html Study Questions Value of Anti-Meth Campaign]. ''Washington Post'', December 11, 2008 |
|||
* [http://www.montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story.asp?S=9555980&nav=menu227_7 Governor wants more info on Meth Project study]. Associated Press, December 19, 2008 |
|||
* [http://www.greatfallstribune.com/article/20081220/NEWS01/81220012 Meth Project Study Author Declines Governor's Visit], Matt Gouras (Associated Press), Great Falls Tribune, December 20, 2008 |
|||
* [http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=245336 Graphic anti-meth ads catching on]. ''Stateline'', October 04, 2007 |
|||
* [http://www.missoulanews.com/index.cfm?do=article.details&id=43C3058D-1372-FCBB-83EEEE780F6331A1 Is the Project working?], ''[[Missoula Independent]]'', September 27, 2007 |
|||
* [http://missoulanews.com/index.cfm?CFID=1632273&CFTOKEN=32847826&do=article.details&id=0609F40B-2BF4-55D0-F1FBC76356A23DD7 An expensive habit: State pledges $2 million to Montana Meth Project], ''[[Missoula Independent]]'', April 19, 2007 |
|||
* [http://www.november.org/stayinfo/breaking06/CrankedUp.html Why The Montana Meth Project Isn't All It's Cranked Up To Be], ''[[Missoula Independent]]'', August 3, 2006 |
|||
{{Methamphetamine}} |
{{Methamphetamine}} |
||
Revision as of 05:28, 1 July 2009
The Montana Meth Project (MMP) is a Montana-based organization founded by Thomas Siebel which seeks to reduce methamphetamine abuse, particularly among teenagers. The main venture of the MMP is a saturation-level advertising campaign of television, radio, and print ads which graphically depict the consequences of methamphetamine use. Common elements are the deterioration of each teenage subject's health and living conditions, amphetamine psychosis, moral compromise, and regret.
Effectiveness of the Campaign
According to a 2007 Montana State Office of Public Instruction Report,[1] since the inception of the program in 2005, there has also been a 72% relative decrease in adult methamphetamine use, and a 62% relative decline in methamphetamine-related crimes.[2]. In april 2007, the Associated Press reported that state and community efforts aimed at curbing the methamphetamine problem, have helped to increase law enforcement efforts." Montana's Attorney General released a report , which credits the program with helping change attitudes about meth - and cites a survey in which 93 percent of Montana students considered meth a "great risk." The April 2007 report, Methamphetamine in Montana: A Follow-up on Trends and Progress [3] describes the impact the Meth Project has had on methamphetamine use in montana, in addition to law enforcement efforts.
Government recognition and expansion
The MMP was cited by the White House as a "model for the nation."[4]. In June of 2007, the FBI recognized Montana Meth Project creator Thomas Siebel with the Director's Community Leadership Award. Special Agent in Charge Timothy Fuhrman, of the Salt Lake City FBI field office, praised Siebel for making "a real difference in the lives of the people of Montana and across the country." [5]. As of mid 2009, the campaign has expanded to include Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, and Wyoming.
References
- Methamphetamine in Montana: A Follow-up on Trends and Progress
External links
- Montana Meth Project, Montana site. Newest ads are listed first.
- Meth Project Foundation, national site. Ads are listed from oldest to newest.
Press
- State's Largest Demonstration Captured in Meth Project Documentary Helena Independent Record, April 21, 2009
- FBI Honors Siebel for Meth Project Work "Great Falls Tribune", June 6, 2007
- Montana meth ads winning drug battle "BBC News", August 22, 2008
- Getting Real About Meth "Family Circle", February 2009
- Societal Cost of Meth Use Is Gauged in New Study "New York Times", February 4, 2009
- The Montana Meth Project Shock tactics "Economist.com", May 1, 2008
Graphic ads have reversed a trend