Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Hollow Wilerding

Hollow Wilerding

[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Hollow Wilerding|action=edit}} Vote here] (0/3/1) ending 03:05 January 6, 2006 (UTC)

Hollow Wilerding (talk · contribs) – Honestly, Hollow Wilerding is simply amazing. She was responsible for elevating The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask article to featured article status and is proceeding to achieve this same success with Luxurious (song). She is very active in the Wikipedian community and participates in several featured article candidate discussions, Wikipedia project discussions, and socializes with users frequently about and not about Wikipedia. I truly believe that she would make an excellent sysop, though I'm unsure how she'll take the news of being nominated. ;) DrippingInk 03:05, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Well... wow. I must admit that I did not expect this. For one, luring me away from my computer for ten minutes while filling out an RfA notice sounds a bit... inhumane (just kidding!). Actually, it sounds very interesting. If it was DrippingInk's decision, then I suppose I'll accept. I'm not really looking on the bright side of things though. But who knows! I accept! —Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 03:20, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

1. She may be a good writer, but her conduct on WP:FAC at the moment is so incredibly unbecoming of an administrator that I'm gobsmacked she's even been nominated. Ambi 04:11, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
2. Oppose per her comments on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hollaback Girl, specifically [1], [2], [3], [4], and most of all [5]. Talrias (t | e | c) 04:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
3. Oppose. User has only been here since November 5. I also note a suspicion that this is a sock puppet or reincarnation of Winnermario (talk · contribs) [6] and I didn't like these comments. [7] [8] I've no idea whether the sock puppet concern is correct. Perhaps the candidate could comment. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 04:13, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
4. Oppose as far as I'm concerned, a bit too little Wikipedia-related (MFD, RFA, RFD, AFD etc) discussion. NSLE _(T+C+CVU) 04:16, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Neutral leaning towards support, I always support pressganging people into adminstrative service, but I'd like to see how she handles this RFA first.--Tznkai 03:17, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments

• What's this about "luring me away from my computer for ten minutes?" Do you and DrippingInk share a computer or something? —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 04:17, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A. Whenever an issue requires clean-up or assistance, I will exercise one of the abilities of an administrator, that being from speedy deletion to blocking a vandal. —Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 03:20, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. I am exceptionally pleased with The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask, as I promoted it to featured article quality. I am also quite content with Luxurious (song) and Shakira, both of which I've upgraded to average quality. —Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 03:20, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A. Well I'm positive that I've been involved in edit warring and such, but there are none that stick out in my mind right now. No users have caused me any stress. I believe that when there is less stress floating around, a happier Wikipedia community exists. —Hollow Wilerding . . . (talk) 03:20, 31 December 2005 (UTC)