Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Galileo: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Project Galileo]]: Fake edit |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Project Galileo]]=== |
===[[Project Galileo]]=== |
||
This page was speedied as vanity, which I don't believe is a valid CSD. I have restored the article and cleaned it up a bit; it was written by a very new user who I don't belive fully understands the nature of Wikipedia. In fairness to the admin who speedied it, I am listing it here for a consensus. '''I am not voting.''' [[User:Essjay|Essjay]] · [[User_talk:Essjay| Talk]] 20:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) |
This page was speedied as vanity, which I don't believe is a valid CSD. I have restored the article and cleaned it up a bit; it was written by a very new user who I don't belive fully understands the nature of Wikipedia. In fairness to the admin who speedied it, I am listing it here for a consensus. '''I am not voting.''' [[User:Essjay|Essjay]] · [[User_talk:Essjay| Talk]] 20:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' This appears to be a notable Local Education Authority programme. |
*'''Keep''' This appears to be a notable Local Education Authority programme. It can be expanded, requires citations and Wikification but the kernal of the piece is sound. -- [[User:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] [[Image:Flag_of_England.svg|25px|UK]] 21:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep''' per above. Good start to this article. -- [[User:JJay|JJay]] 22:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC) |
* '''Keep''' per above. Good start to this article. -- [[User:JJay|JJay]] 22:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. Needs work, but it's a notable project. [[User:Crunch|Crunch]] 23:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. Needs work, but it's a notable project. [[User:Crunch|Crunch]] 23:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 07:22, 11 January 2006
This page was speedied as vanity, which I don't believe is a valid CSD. I have restored the article and cleaned it up a bit; it was written by a very new user who I don't belive fully understands the nature of Wikipedia. In fairness to the admin who speedied it, I am listing it here for a consensus. I am not voting. Essjay · Talk 20:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep This appears to be a notable Local Education Authority programme. It can be expanded, requires citations and Wikification but the kernal of the piece is sound. -- (aeropagitica)
21:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC) - Keep per above. Good start to this article. -- JJay 22:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Needs work, but it's a notable project. Crunch 23:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep It is not a one school thing as the opening sentence implied before I changed it. Calsicol 23:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
