User talk:Winston786: Difference between revisions
You have been blocked from editing for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule on History of India. (TW) |
Sikh-history (talk | contribs) →I Did tell you this would happen.: new section |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:History of India]]. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 19:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]].</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:History of India]]. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 19:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]].</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
||
== I Did tell you this would happen. == |
|||
Fellow Editor, you must refrain from this attitude where you think by inserting what you think is right everywhere and not gaining [[WP:Consensus]] is the right attitude. Your [[WP:GAME]] on article [[Jatt Sikh]] may have suceeded in getting me blocked, but as you can see, with Administrators, it is different ball game. I hope you have time to reflect and come back with a new attitude. Thanks--[[User:Sikh-history|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue;font-size:16px">Sikh-</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:goldenrod;font-size:16px">History</em>]] 10:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:43, 26 January 2011
Warning
You've had sufficient notes, suggestions and warnings from multiple editors about your editing here. So, please understand how the encyclopaedia works and work within those constraints. —SpacemanSpiff 19:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Please discuss before deletion, I have added fully sourced material.Winston786 (talk) 19:12, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
January 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on History of India. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.
In particular the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —SpacemanSpiff 19:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. T. Canens (talk) 19:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
I Did tell you this would happen.
Fellow Editor, you must refrain from this attitude where you think by inserting what you think is right everywhere and not gaining WP:Consensus is the right attitude. Your WP:GAME on article Jatt Sikh may have suceeded in getting me blocked, but as you can see, with Administrators, it is different ball game. I hope you have time to reflect and come back with a new attitude. Thanks--Sikh-History 10:43, 26 January 2011 (UTC)